Content area

Abstract

The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss ranges from 1 to 3 per 1,000 live births in term healthy neonates, and 24 per 100 in high-risk infants, a 10-fold increase. Early identication and intervention with hearing augmentation within 6 mo yields optimal eect. If undetected and without treatment, signicant hearing impairment may negatively impact speech development and lead to disorders in psychological and mental behaviors. Hearing screening programs in newborns enable detection of hearing impairment in the rst days after birth. Programs to identify hearing decit have signicantly improved over the two decades, and their implementation continues to grow throughout the world. Initially based on risk factors, these programs identied only 5075% of infants with hearing loss. Current recommendations are to conduct universal hearing screening in all infants. Techniques used primarily include automated auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions that provide noninvasive recordings of physiologic auditory activity and are easily performed in neonates and infants. The aim of this review is to present the objectives, benets, and results of newborn hearing screening programs including the pros and cons of universal vs. selective screening. A brief history and the anticipated future development of these programs will also be discussed.

Details

Title
Universal newborn hearing screening: methods and results, obstacles, and benefits
Author
Wroblewska-seniuk, Katarzyna E; Dabrowski, Piotr; Szyfter, Witold; Mazela, Jan
Pages
415-422
Publication year
2017
Publication date
Mar 2017
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
ISSN
00313998
e-ISSN
15300447
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1884214537
Copyright
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2017