It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) were projected to wind up plainly the texture of our condition and society. However, they are yet not ready to defeat various operational difficulties, for example, limited system lifetime, which suppress their general deployment. To prolong WSN lifetime, most of the existing clustering schemes are geared towards homogeneous WSN and heterogeneous WSN. This paper is a comparative review on the critical problem of system lifetime of WSN and extravagantly looks at seven distinguished but prominent routing protocols namely LEACH, TEEN, PEGASIS, DEEC, DDEEC, EDEEC and EDDEEC for some general situations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer