Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in Piedmont, 1967–2011

Abstract

In the past, increases in childhood cancer incidence were reported in Europe and North America. The aim of this study is to show updated patterns of temporal behavior using data of the Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont (CCRP), a region with approximately 4.5 million inhabitants in North-West Italy. CCRP has been recording incident cases in children (0–14 years) since 1967 and in adolescents (15–19) since 2000. Time trends were estimated as annual percent change (APC) over the 1976–2011 period for children, and over 2000–2011 for both children and adolescents. CCRP registered 5020 incident cases from 1967 to 2011. Incidence rates were 157 per million person-years for children (1967–2011) and 282 for adolescents (2000–2011). From 1976–2011, increasing trends were observed in children for all neoplasms (APC 1.1, 95%CI: 0.8; 1.5) and for both embryonal and non-embryonal tumors: 1.1%, (0.5; 1.6) and 1.2%, (0.7; 1.6), respectively. Increases were observed in several tumor types, including leukemia, lymphoma, central nervous system tumors and neuroblastoma. In 2000–2011, incidence rates showed mostly non statistically significant variations and large variability. The observation of trends over a long period shows that the incidence of most tumors has increased, and this is only partially explained by diagnostic changes. Large rate variability hampers interpretation of trend patterns in short periods. Given that no satisfying explanation for the increases observed in the past was ever found, efforts must be made to understand and interpret this peculiar and still ununderstood pattern of childhood cancer incidence.

About the Authors:

Elena Isaevska

Contributed equally to this work with: Elena Isaevska, Milena Manasievska

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-7990

Milena Manasievska

Contributed equally to this work with: Elena Isaevska, Milena Manasievska

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Daniela Alessi

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Maria Luisa Mosso

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Corrado Magnani

Roles Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Translational Medicine, Unit of Medical Statistics and Cancer Epidemiology, CPO Piemonte and University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy

Carlotta Sacerdote

Roles Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Guido Pastore

Roles Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Franca Fagioli

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Pediatric Onco-Haematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy

Franco Merletti

Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Milena Maule

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Introduction

In the last decades of the previous millennium, strong and unexplained increases in the incidence of childhood tumors were observed in Europe and USA [1–3]. In Italy, the AIRTUM (the Italian Association of Cancer Registries) working group in its 2008 report [4] showed alarming increases in incidence rates, even emphasized by media, whereas its edition from 2012 [5] showed that incidence rates seemed to be no longer increasing. The Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont (CCRP) reported increasing incidence trends during the period 1967–2001 [6], specifically for leukemias, central nervous system (CNS) tumors and neuroblastomas. Taking advantage of the very long series of childhood cancer cases records of the CCRP, our aim is to show updated patterns of temporal behavior of childhood cancer incidence. We have calculated incidence rates for the whole period of CCRP registration, from 1967 to 2011, and estimated time trends in two periods: from 1976 to 2011, a long time interval covering 36 years of registration of childhood cancer cases; and from 2000–2011, and a short time interval covering the last available 12 years of registration of both childhood and adolescents cancer cases.

Methods

The Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont

Data were obtained from the CCRP, the oldest and largest pediatric population-based cancer Registry active in Italy. The registry has been recording cancer cases in children (0–14 years) since 1965 and in adolescents (15–19 years) since 2000. The first 2 years of registration were used to identify prevalent cases whereas data from 1967 onwards have been used to estimate the incidence. Before avaliability of the hospital admission and discharge files (from mid 90s), cases were searched through manual perusal of hospital registries and clinical records. From then on, cases are identified from the Hospital Admission and Discharge files, including hospital stays of all Piedmont residents in all Italian hospitals. The potentially relevant discharge diagnoses are then selected, and their complete clinical documentation is requested and examined by an experienced pediatrician in order to identify incident cases. Further case ascertainment is obtained from the databases of pathology departments of Piedmont hospitals, records for reimbursements for cancer treatments administered abroad, the Turin Cancer Registry and the database of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. Only CCRP authorized personnel can access individual data. Data are anonymised before statistical analysis.

CCRP data quality indicators by period of registration are shown in Table 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Data quality indicators by calendar period.

Total number of cases per period (N), cases (number and percentage) identified through death certificate only (DCO), microscopically verified (MV) cases, cases with ill-defined or unspecified site (ICD-10: C26, C39, C48, C76, C80), cases based on imaging only, by calendar period of registration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805.t001

Cases are included in the CCRP only after positive confirmation of age and residence in Piedmont at diagnosis, verified at the residence Town Office Registrar. All diagnoses are coded using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) [7] classification and then grouped into the 12 main diagnostic groups of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, Third Edition (ICCC-3) [8]. In the analyses we have included all malignant tumors, and malignant and benign tumors of the CNS. In addition to the ICCC groups, we analyzed embryonal tumors as a separate category. There is no widely accepted definition for embryonal tumors and different authors have used different definitions [5,9–12]. In the absence of a unique classifying system, we have grouped all the tumor types explicitly described in the World Health Organization (WHO)/ International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Classification of Tumors series (“WHO blue books”) [13–21] as possibly originating from the embryonic tissue.

The list of embryonal tumors includes the following ICD-O-3 morphological codes: 8902, 8910, 8912, 8959, 8960, 8963, 8970, 8972, 8973, 9110, 9270, 9290, 9310, 9330, 9342, 9362, 9370, 9371, 9372, 9392, 9470, 9471, 9472, 9473, 9474, 9480, 9490, 9500, 9501, 9502, 9508, 9510, 9511, 9512, 9513, 9520, 9521 and 9522.

From 1970 to 1975 the registration was limited to the Province of Torino.

Statistical analyses

Crude incidence rates were calculated as the number of new cases per million person-years for the 12 main ICCC diagnostic groups as well as for the most important subgroups, by age class. The analysis of incidence trends was restricted to the period 1976–2011 to include data from the whole region of Piedmont (registration was limited to the Province of Torino in the period 1970–1975) and to avoid major diagnostic changes in the diagnosis and classification of leukemia. Time trends were estimated also separately for the last available 12 years of observation (2000–2011), when the analysis is possible in both children and adolescents.

With regard to CNS tumors, we started the time trend analysis from 1982 in order to avoid biases due to improvements in diagnostics (such as the use of CT scans at the beginning of the 1980’s). Due to the heterogeneity of behavior, we also estimated time trends for all histologically verified CNS tumors by WHO grading [13]. The idea is that more sensitive diagnostic techniques might have artificially increased the incidence of slow growing tumors with lower grading but have only marginally affected the incidence of the aggressive malignant tumors with rapid growth and higher grading. Exclusion of cases with no histological verification ensures that if an increased trend is observed, this cannot be ascribed to an improved capability of identifying benign lesions that are not surgically removed.

For neuroblastomas we conducted a sensitivity analysis starting the time trend analysis from 1990, to account for the introduction of ultrasound techniques for the early detection of newborn hip dysplasia.

The trend in incidence rates over time was estimated as the annual percent change (APC) of the incidence rates, using the Joinpoint Regression Program [22]. For the calculation of APC in the 0–14 age group we used age standardized rates and their standard errors, using the world standard population (WHO 2000–2025). For the calculation of APC in the <1 and 15–19 age groups, we fitted log-linear regression models to data assuming a Poisson distribution.

Results

In 1967–2011, CCRP registered 5020 incident cases. The incidence rate of all tumor types for children (0–14 years) was 156.9 (151.3–161.6) (Table 2). In 2000–2011, the incidence rate for adolescents (15–19 years) was 281.7 (259.8–305.0) (Table 2). There was a statistically significant increase in incidence rates of all tumor types in children for the overall period starting 1976–2011, with APC 1.1% (0.8; 1.5), as well as of both embryonal and non-embryonal tumors: APC 1.1% (0.5; 1,6) and 1.2% (0.7; 1.6), respectively (Table 3, Fig 1). Embryonal tumors incidence peaks in the 0 age group and declines with age (Table 2, Fig 2), and their trend in the period 1976–2011 is mostly due to the increase in the first year of life, APC 1.5% (0.4; 2.7).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Incidence rates in children and adolescents by 3 year periods.

(Data for adolescents available from 2000).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Incidence rates in children and adolescents by single year of age.

(Data for adolescents available from 2000).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Incidence rates by age groups.

Number of cases (n), incidence rates per million per year (rate) and male-to-female ratio (M/F).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805.t002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1976–2011: Number of cases (n) and annual percent change (APC) with corresponding 95% confidence interval.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805.t003

Leukemia is the most common cancer type in children. Acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) accounts for around 73% of all leukemia cases. ALL incidence peaks in the 1–4 year age group, with a rate of 75.9 (69.6; 82.6) in the whole observation period (1967–2011) (Table 2, Fig 2). We found a statistically significant increase in all leukemias incidence rates in the period 1976–2011, APC 0.6% (0.0; 1.2), which seems mainly driven by the increase of ALL, APC 0.9% (0.3; 1.4) (Table 3).

Lymphomas are the most common cancer type in adolescents. Their incidence rates in children are 18.7 (17.1–20.4) and 89.7 (77.6–103.3) in adolescents (Table 2). Male predominance is remarkable in both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Table 2). HL incidence rate among adolescents is particularly high, 69.4 (58.7–81.4) (Table 2). In children, the overall (1976–2011) time trend for all lymphomas exhibited a breakpoint, with increasing incidence until 2007, APC 1.7% (0.6; 2.7), followed by a non statistically significant decline afterwards (Table 3).

CNS neoplasms are the second most common cancer type in children (23.4% of all tumors) and third most common cancer type in adolescents (13.3% of all tumors), with high rates in both children 36.7 (34.5–39.0) and adolescents 37.5 (29.8–46.6) (Table 1, Fig 2). In the chosen observation period (from 1982, to account for improved diagnostic techniques, to 2011) CNS tumors exhibited a significant increase in incidence rates, APC 1.8% (0.9; 2.7) (Table 3). In the analysis by tumor grading, CNS tumors with both grade I and IV showed a strong increase, APC 3.6% (2.5; 4.8) and 2.4% (0.7; 4.2), respectively. On the contrary, grade II and III tumors (grouped together) showed an increase until 1997 APC 5.1% (0.4; 10.0) followed by a decline APC -6.4% (-11.2; -1.5). (data not shown).

The incidence rate of neuroblastoma is highest in children in their first year of life, 68.0 (56.2–81.6) (Table 2). The trend analysis showed an increase in incidence rates for the overall period (1976–2011) in all children APC 1.2% (0.2; 2.1) (Table 3) and in those in their first year of life APC 2.5% (0.7; 4.2). When we restricted the neuroblastoma trend analysis to the period 1990 to 2011, increases in time trends lost statistical significance: APC 1.7% (-0.4;3.7) for all children, and APC 2.0% (-1.5; 5.7) for <1 year old children (data not shown).

The analysis of the period 2000–2011 (with the exception of hepatoblastomas in children) showed no statistically significant variation in incidence rates, neither in children, nor in adolescents. The major ICCC groups (namely leukemias, lymphomas, CNS tumors and neuroblastomas) that showed an increase for the 1976-2011period in children, show decreasing rates in 2000–2011 (Table 3).

Discussion

Analyzing the overall time trends (1976–2011) in children, we found statistically significant increases in incidence rates in all tumors types combined, and in both embryonal and non-embryonal tumors when analysed as separate categories. In the analysis by ICCC diagnostic groups, we found increases in leukemias (mainly due to the increase of ALL), lymphomas, CNS tumors (from 1982) and neuroblastomas.

The analysis of the most recent period (2000–2011) did not provide sufficient evidence to claim that the increasing trends that have characterized the whole time series have now started inverting their tendency, since the rarity of cancer in the age groups considered is affected by large variability that hampers interpretation.

When we interpret our findings, we must consider that changes in data collection, classification or changes in diagnostic procedures might have influenced our results.

The quality and completeness of data collected from CCRP has been high and its data have been included in all major studies on childhood cancer incidence in Italy and Europe [4,5,12,23]. In the first 10 years of registration (1967–1976) there were 55 cases identified only through death certificate (DCO), but only one after 1976 (Table 1). The proportion of microscopic verification (MV) increased until the last period, where it showed a slight decline mirrored by an increase in the percentage of diagnoses exclusively based on imaging, showing increased diagnostic capacity rather than a decline in the quality of registration (Table 1). After 1975, around 95% of all cases have histological confirmation.

In our observation window, several relevant diagnostic changes occurred. From mid 1970’s the distinction between ALL and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) became reliable through the introduction of flow cytometry so that the proportion of unspecified leukemias became negligible. For CNS tumors, major diagnostic improvements included the introduction of CT scans and their widespread use in the 1980’s, followed by that of magnetic resonance in the 1990’s, and of cranial ultrasound in newborns from the 1990’s. Relevant diagnostic changes for neuroblastoma (and possibly for other embryonal abdominal neoplasms, such as nephroblastoma and hepatoblastoma) were the antenatal and perinanatal ultrasound imaging in mid 1980’s and the widespread use of hip ultrasound from mid 1990’s.

It is unlikely that improved classification explains the observed ALL increasing trends. In our data, from mid 1970’s, the proportion of unspecified leukemias has been constantly low, and that of MV cases for ALL was 100%. Increasing leukemia time trends have been observed in previous CCRP [6,24] and Italian [4,5] studies. Incidence rates in Italy mostly increased in the 1980’s until mid 1990’s, especially those of ALLs in the 1–4 age group. A similar behavior was observed in other European countries [1,2,25–28], more pronouncedly in western then eastern Europe. SEER data in a similar period (1975–2013) also show an increase in leukemia rates (APC 0.7%, p<0.05) [3].

HL behavior is particularly interesting because Italian rates among children and adolescents (0–19 years old) are the highest of the world [29]. In USA [30] and Nordic countries [31], rates were approximately half of those observed in Piedmont and in Italy [5]. (Table 4) Our analysis did not show statistically significant trends for HL, but showed an increase in all lymphomas considered together in 0–14 years old up to 2007, followed by a decrease. APC was higher for HL than for all lymphomas (2.2 vs 1.7). A previous CCRP study [6] for the period 1967–2001, found a statistically significant increased incidence rates for HL in 10–14 year old children.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Hodgkin lymphoma rates by age group and gender in Piedmont, Italy, Nordic countries and the USA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805.t004

The AIRTUM working group [5] found an increase in children for all lymphomas up to 1999 and a decline afterwards. In Europe, for the period 1975–1997, the increase in HL was found in both the 10–14 (AAPC (average annual percent change) 1%) and the 15–19 (AAPC 3.5%) age groups[32]. In USA, HL showed a decline (1975–2013, 0–19 years, APC -0.6%, p<0.05) and NHL an increase (1975–2013, 0–19 years, APC1.1%, p<0.05) [3].

There were previous reports of increasing trends of CNS tumors in Europe and USA [33–35]. The Automated Childhood Cancer Information System study on childhood CNS tumors [33] reported increased incidence in Europe in the period 1978–1997, that the authors partly explained with improved diagnostic methods and changes in classification and registration. In Italy, the AIRTUM study [5] found increasing trends in all CNS tumors considered together, but the analysis restricted to those with malignant behavior showed stable rates. In Piedmont, a previous study analyzing trends from 1967–2001 [6] found significantly increasing CNS tumor trends that showed a constant gradual change rather than a step-increase that usually follows the introduction of new diagnostic techniques. In our analysis, we found statistically significant increases in incidence rates of CNS tumors even after starting the analysis from 1982 to account for the introduction of CT scans. When we looked into the incidence pattern of CNS by WHO grade, we found that grade I tumors that are more likely to be affected by improvements in diagnostics, have indeed been increasing. However, also the incidence of highly malignant grade IV tumors has been increasing. Given the rapidly growing and aggressive nature of these tumors, it is unlikely that a diagnostic anticipation may translate into an apparent increasing trend, thus leading us to the conclusion that the increasing trends of CNS tumors might reflect a true change in the risk factors patterns of exposure.

In Europe, the incidence of embryonal tumors like neuroblastoma, nephroblastoma and, to a lesser extent, retinoblastoma and hepatoblastoma, seem to have increased [1,11,36–39]. The significant increases for all embryonal tumors for the overall period, are mostly due to the increase in rates of cases diagnosed in the first year of life. This increase might be partly due to introduction of antenatal and perinanatal ultrasound imaging in Italy in the mid 1980’s and the use of hip ultrasound from around 1995, especially for tumors that in a small proportion may regress spontaneously, such as neuroblastoma. Indeed, when the trend analysis was restricted to the period 1990–2011, increases in time trends for neuroblastoma persisted but lost statistical significance and time trends from 2000 show decreasing rates for embryonal tumors in children, including neuroblastoma and retinoblastoma. Hepatoblastomas, however, showed an increase, although our analysis is based on small numbers.

In conclusion, in Piedmont, the analysis of trends over a long period (1976–2011) shows that the incidence of most tumor types has increased. When we looked more closely at the most recent years of observation (2000–2011), we found that rates seem to have started levelling off. However, large variability hampers interpretation of trends pattern in short periods. In Europe, the upward trends were detected more then 12 years ago, but as yet no satisfying explanation for the past increases has been found. Efforts must be made to understand and interpret this peculiar and still ununderstood pattern of incidence of childhood cancer.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Master of Epidemiology (University of Turin). Elena Isaevska and Milena Manasievska acknowledge two scholarships from the European Commission through the Erasmus Mundus for Western Balkans II programme (Grant Agreement 2011-2586/001-001-EMA2). We are extremely grateful to Benedetto Terracini for many useful discussions and revision of the manuscript and to Carlotta Buzzoni for her suggestions.

Citation: Isaevska E, Manasievska M, Alessi D, Mosso ML, Magnani C, Sacerdote C, et al. (2017) Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in Piedmont, 1967–2011. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0181805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181805

References

1. Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Kaatsch P, Berrino F, Coebergh JW, Lacour B, et al. Geographical patterns and time trends of cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents in Europe since the 1970s (the ACCIS project): an epidemiological study. Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2097–105. pmid:15589307

2. Kaatsch P. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Jun;36(4):277–85. pmid:20231056

3. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, et al.(Eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013 SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/, based on November 2015 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2016. 2016;1992–2013.

4. AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures Report 2008. Childhood cancer: incidence, survival, trend. Epidemiol Prev. 2008;32(2):1–111.

5. AIRTUM Working Group, CCM AWG. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents. Epidemiol Prev. 2013;37(1):1–225.

6. Dalmasso P, Pastore G, Zuccolo L, Maule MM, Pearce N, Merletti F, et al. Temporal trends in the incidence of childhood leukemia, lymphomas and solid tumors in north-west Italy, 1967–2001. A report of the Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont. Haematologica. 2005 Sep 1;90(9):1197–204. pmid:16154843

7. Fritz AG. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O). World Heal Organ. 2000;240.

8. Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International classification of childhood cancer, third edition. Cancer. 2005;103(7):1457–67. pmid:15712273

9. Willis RA. The Borderland of Embryology and Pathology: The Middleton-Goldsmith Lecture. Bull New York Acad Med 1950;26(7)440–460. 1950;26(7):440:460.

10. Gatta G, Ferrari A, Stiller CA, Pastore G, Bisogno G, Trama A, et al. Embryonal cancers in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(10):1425–33. pmid:22357215

11. Tulla M, Berthold F, Graf N, Rutkowski S, von Schweinitz D, Spix C, et al. Incidence, Trends, and Survival of Children With Embryonal Tumors. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):e623–32. pmid:26304823

12. AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures. Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;40(1):1–120.

13. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system (vol 114, pg 97, 2007). Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:547.

14. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW MF, editor. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 4th Edition, Volume 5. 2013

15. DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU EC, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 8. 2004.

16. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH TN, editor. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 4th Edition, Volume 3. 2010.

17. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK HC, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 10. 2004.

18. Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein J SI, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 7. 2004.

19. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P SD, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 9. 2005.

20. Tavassoli FA DP, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 4. 2003.

21. Campbell RJ. Histological Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Its Adnexa. In: Histological Typing of Tumours of the Eye and Its Adnexa. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1998.

22. National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression Program—Surveillance Research Program. June 2015. Available from: http://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/

23. Steliarova-Foucher E, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Pompe-Kirn V, Eser S, Miranda A, et al. Quality, comparability and methods of analysis of data on childhood cancer in Europe (1978–1997): report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):1915–51. pmid:16919762

24. Magnani C, Dalmasso P, Pastore G, Terracini B, Martuzzi M, Mosso ML, et al. Increasing incidence of childhood leukemia in Northwest Italy, 1975–98. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(4):552–7. pmid:12712449

25. McNally RJ, Cairns DP, Eden OB, Kelsey a M, Taylor GM, Birch JM. Examination of temporal trends in the incidence of childhood leukaemias and lymphomas provides aetiological clues. Leuk Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund, UK. 2001;15(10):1612–8.

26. Kroll ME, Draper GJ, Stiller CA, Murphy MFG. Childhood leukemia incidence in Britain, 1974–2000: Time trends and possible relation to influenza epidemics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(6):417–20. pmid:16537835

27. Spix C, Eletr D, Blettner M, Kaatsch P. Temporal trends in the incidence rate of childhood cancer in Germany 1987–2004. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(8):1859–67. pmid:18076067

28. Dreifaldt AC, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Increasing incidence rates of childhood malignant diseases in Sweden during the period 1960–1998. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(9):1351–60. pmid:15177495

29. Linet MS, Brown LM, Mbulaiteye SM, Check D, Ostroumova E, Landgren A, et al. International long-term trends and recent patterns in the incidence of leukemias and lymphomas among children and adolescents ages 0–19 years. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(8):1862–74. pmid:26562742

30. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 9 Regs Research Data N 2015 S (1973–2013). National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission.

31. Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Kejs AMT, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, et al. NORDCAN: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 7.3 (08.07.2016). Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Danish Cancer Society. Available from http://www.ancr.nu, accessed 22/07/2016).

32. Clavel J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Berger C, Danon S, Valerianova Z. Hodgkin’s disease incidence and survival in European children and adolescents (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2037–49. pmid:16919769

33. Peris-Bonet R, Martínez-García C, Lacour B, Petrovich S, Giner-Ripoll B, Navajas A, et al. Childhood central nervous system tumours—incidence and survival in Europe (1978–1997): Report from Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2064–80. pmid:16919771

34. Smith MA, Freidlin B, Ries LAG, Simon R. Trends in reported incidence of primary malignant brain tumors in children in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(17):1269–1277. pmid:9731733

35. Arora R, Alston R, Eden T, Estlin E, Moran A, Birch J. Age-incidence patterns of primary CNS tumors in children, adolescents, and adults in England. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(4):403–13. pmid:19033157

36. Spix C, Pastore G, Sankila R, Stiller CA, Steliarova-Foucher E. Neuroblastoma incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2081–91. pmid:16919772

37. Pastore G, Znaor A, Spreafico F, Graf N, Pritchard-Jones K S-FE. Malignant renal tumours incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2103–14. pmid:16919774

38. MacCarthy A, Draper GJ, Steliarova-Foucher E, Kingston JE. Retinoblastoma incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997). Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2092–102. pmid:16919773

39. Stiller CA, Pritchard J S-FE. Liver cancer in European children: incidence and survival, 1978–1997. Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2115–23. pmid:16919775