Impact of a spectral sampling technique for radiation on ECMWF weather forecasts

Abstract

Radiation transfer computations are one of the most expensive components of atmospheric models integrations. Methods generally applied to reduce their computational cost, include less frequent update of the radiative fluxes or coarser spatial grids than those used for the rest of the model. In the operational configuration of the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) used at the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), radiation accounts for ∼ 10% of the total computer time, and the radiative fluxes are computed with both a reduced temporal and spatial resolution. In this study, we show that these approximations have a negligible impact on the forecast errors when looking at the large-scale circulation but they lead to biases in the surface temperature. These are linked to inconsistencies in the representation of surface properties or to poorly sampled temporal evolution of the radiative fluxes. Here we explore an alternative method to alleviate such errors, based on a recently developed technique that estimates radiative fluxes from randomly-chosen subsets of spectral points designed to minimize the surface flux error. This approach introduces substantial uncorrelated noise in the radiative fluxes at the surface and heating rates, but it reduces the cost associated to the spectral integration. Therefore, it allows to update the radiative transfer computations more frequently and to perform them on a denser spatial grid. We evaluate how this approach applies to 5 days weather forecasts by testing different combinations of temporal and spectral sampling at high spatial resolution. We assess the impact of each radiation configuration on the forecast, by comparing the near-surface temperatures to observations from synoptic stations. The results show that a combination of spectrally sparse but temporally and spatially dense radiation calculations has the potential to reduce the forecast errors, particularly those associated with underresolved topography and stable nocturnal boundary layers, with affordable computational costs.

References Augustine, J. A., J. J. DeLuisi, and C. N. Long (2000), SURFRAD: A national surface radiation budget network for atmospheric research, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81(10), 2341–2357, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081 <2341:SANSRB >2.3.CO;2. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg (1995), Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57(1), 289–300. Buizza, R., M. Milleer, and T. N. Palmer (1999), Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125(560), 2887–2908, doi:10.1002/qj.49712556006. Fu, Q., and K. N. Liou (1992), On the correlated k-distribution method for radiative transfer in nonhomogeneous atmospheres, J. Atmos. Sci, 49, 2139–2156, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049 <2139:otcdmf >2.0.co;2. Hill, P. G., J. Manners, and J. C. Petch (2011), Reducing noise associated with the Monte Carlo independent column approximation for weather forecasting models, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137(654), 219–228, doi:10.1002/qj.732. Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins (2008), Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, doi:10.1029/2008JD009944. Lacis, A. A., and V. Oinas (1991), A description of the correlated k distribution method for modeling nongray gaseous absorption, thermal emission, and multiple scattering in vertically inhomogeneous atmospheres, J. Geophys. Res., 96(D5), 9027–9063, doi:10.1029/90JD01945. Laprise, R. (1992), The resolution of global spectral models, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73(9), 1453–1454. Manners, J., J. C. Thelen, J. Petch, P. Hill, and J. M. Edwards (2009), Two fast radiative transfer methods to improve the temporal sampling of clouds in numerical weather prediction and climate models, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 135(639), 457–468, doi:10.1002/qj.385. Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough (1997), Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D14), 16,663–16,682, doi:10.1029/97JD00237. Morcrette, J.-J. (2000), On the effects of the temporal and spatial sampling of radiation fields on the ECMWF forecasts and analyses, Mon. Weather Rev., 128(3), 876–887, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128 <0876:OTEOTT >2.0.CO;2. Morcrette, J.-J. (2002), The surface downward longwave radiation in the ECMWF forecast system, J. Clim., 15(14), 1875–1892, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015 <1875:TSDLRI >2.0.CO;2. Morcrette, J.-J., G. Mozdzynski, and M. Leutbecher (2008a), A reduced radiation grid for the ECMWF integrated forecasting system, Mon. Weather Rev., 136(12), 4760–4772, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2590.1. Morcrette, J.-J., H. W. Barker, J. N. S. Cole, M. J. Iacono, and R. Pincus (2008b), Impact of a new radiation package, McRad, in the ECMWF integrated forecasting system, Mon. Weather Rev., 136(12), 4773–4798, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2363.1. Ohmura, A., et al. (1998), Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN/WCRP): New precision radiometry for climate research, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79(10), 2115–2136, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079 <2115:BSRNBW >2.0.CO;2. Oreopoulos, L., et al. (2012), The continual intercomparison of radiation codes: Results from Phase I, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06118, doi:10.1029/2011JD016821. Pincus, R., and B. Stevens (2009), Monte Carlo spectral integration: A consistent approximation for radiative transfer in large eddy simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 1, doi:10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.1. Pincus, R., and B. Stevens (2013), Paths to accuracy for radiation parameterizations in atmospheric models, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, 225–233, doi:10.1002/jame.20027. Pincus, R., H. W. Barker, and J.-J. Morcrette (2003), A fast, flexible, approximate technique for computing radiative transfer in inhomogeneous cloud fields, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D13), 4376, doi:10.1029/2002JD003322. Skamarock, W. C. (2004), Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra, Mon. Weather Rev., 132(12), 3019–3032, doi:10.1175/MWR2830.1. Venema, V., A. Schomburg, F. Ament, and C. Simmer (2007), Two adaptive radiative transfer schemes for numerical weather prediction models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7(21), 5659–5674, doi:10.5194/acp-7-5659-2007. Ventura, V., C. J. Paciorek, and J. S. Risbey (2004), Controlling the proportion of falsely rejected hypotheses when conducting multiple tests with climatological data, J. Clim., 17(22), 4343–4356, doi:10.1175/3199.1. Zwiers, F. W., and H. von Storch (1995), Taking serial correlation into account in tests of the mean, J. Clim., 8(2), 336–351, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008 <0336:TSCIAI >2.0.CO;2.