It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Coffee and Kombucha tea are both beverages that have been consumed for many years, with a current increased momentum in consumption due to many correlations with beneficial health aspects. The objective of this study was to assess the consumer acceptability of a Kombucha Coffee which tastes more like traditional coffee. A Kombucha Coffee prototype “BubbLê”, was created and compared to a market Kombucha Coffee via a hedonics evaluation, food action rating scale (FACT), and a paired-comparison ranking test. Participants rated the market Kombucha Coffee significantly higher than “BubbLê” Kombucha Coffee in all sensory aspects for flavor (6.84 ± 1.82; 4.46 ± 2.48; p < 0.001), sweetness (7.11 ± 1.63; 4.65 ± 2.33; p < 0.001), tartness (6.27 ± 1.77; 4.72 ± 2.55; p < 0.001), aroma (6.30 ± 1.82; 5.55 ± 2.59; p = 0.018), mouthfeel (6.87 ± 1.62; 5.36 ± 2.64; p < 0.001), and overall likeability (6.90 ±1.76; 4.59 ± 2.43; p < 0.001) in the hedonics evaluation. The FACT test indicated that participants would more likely drink the market alternative compared to the prototype (5.42 ± 1.96; 3.62 ± 2.29; p < 0.001). The majority of participants (80%) chose the market Kombucha Coffee over the more traditional coffee flavored Kombucha Coffee prototype. It is noted that flavor scored the lowest in sensory evaluation for the prototype, therefore, reevaluation of flavor by means of adding coffee enhancing notes are needed for further development of a Kombucha Coffee with a more traditional coffee flavor profile.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer