It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The causes of the recent increase in Antarctic sea ice extent, characterised by large regional contrasts and decadal variations, remain unclear. In the Ross Sea, where such a sea ice increase is reported, 50% of the sea ice is produced within wind-sustained latent-heat polynyas. Combining information from marine diatom records and sea salt sodium and water isotope ice core records, we here document contrasting patterns in sea ice variations between coastal and open sea areas in Western Ross Sea over the current interglacial period. Since about 3600 years before present, an increase in the efficiency of regional latent-heat polynyas resulted in more coastal sea ice, while sea ice extent decreased overall. These past changes coincide with remarkable optima or minima in the abundances of penguins, silverfish and seal remains, confirming the high sensitivity of marine ecosystems to environmental and especially coastal sea ice conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics e Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venezia, Italy; Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes—CNR, Venezia, Italy
3 UMR-CNRS 5805 EPOC, Université de Bordeaux, Allée Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, Pessac cédex, France
4 LSCE (IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris Saclay), Bat 701 L’Orme des Merisiers, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cédex, France
5 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources—CNR, Via G. Moruzzi 1, Pisa, Italy
6 Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
7 ENEA, SP Anguillarese 301, Roma, Italy
8 Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy