The Prognostic Role of the Class III β-Tubulin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Receiving the Taxane/Vinorebine-Based Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background

A number of studies have examined the relationship between the expression of the class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) and the treatment responses to the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the results of these studies were inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic role of TUBB3 in the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy.

Methods

A literature search for relevant studies was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CNKI. The inclusion criteria were the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and the evaluation of the clinical outcomes in relation to the expression of TUBB3. The clinical outcomes analyzed in this study included the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS). Odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to assess the risk associated with the TUBB3 expression in the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 28 studies with 2401 NSCLC patients were qualified for this meta-analysis. We found that the positive or high level of TUBB3 expression was associated with a poorer ORR (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16–0.36, p<0.001), an unfavorable OS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.27–1.82, p<0.001), and a worse EFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.24–1.74, p<0.001) compared to the negative or low level of TUBB3 expression. The statistically significant associations between TUBB3 and chemotherapy responses were also observed in the stratified subgroup analysis, which included the analysis by ethnic subgroup (Asian and Caucasian), chemotherapy regimen (taxane-based and vinorebine-based), TUBB3 detection method (IHC and PCR), and treatment strategy (surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and palliative chemotherapy).

Conclusions

The expression level of TUBB3 may be a useful biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes of the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

About the Authors:

Yan-Long Yang

Contributed equally to this work with: Yan-Long Yang, Xiu-Ping Luo

Affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

Xiu-Ping Luo

Contributed equally to this work with: Yan-Long Yang, Xiu-Ping Luo

Affiliation: Clinical Faculty of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

Lei Xian

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

Introduction

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related death for both men and women worldwide [1]. The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases. Two-thirds of NSCLC cases are diagnosed at advanced stages because the patients are typically asymptomatic at early stages [2]. Due to the recent advancements in the surgical techniques and chemoradiation therapy, the one-year relative survival rate for lung cancer has increased from 35.7% to 44.5% [3]. However, the prognosis of lung cancer, especially for the advanced stage of NSCLC, is still poor. The high morbidity and mortality rates of lung cancer has continued to be a major public health concern worldwide [4].

Approximately half of NSCLC patients receive chemotherapy as part of their treatments, indicating that chemotherapy has become a common treatment method for NSCLC [5]. However, chemoresistance has emerged to be a major problem that has greatly limited the benefits of chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC [5], [6]. The clinical outcomes of chemotherapy are usually very heterogeneous and unpredictable even in NSCLC patients with similar clinical and pathologic features [7]. In addition, chemoresistance results in a waste of public health budget and makes patients suffer from unnecessary adverse effects of chemotherapy [8]. Since genetic factors may play an important role in the development of chemoresistance, it would be of great value to identify useful biomarkers that can predict the clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in NSCLC [8].

Tubulin-binding agents (TBAs), such as taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) and vinca alkaloids (vinorelbine, vincristine), have been widely used in the treatment of NSCLC [9]–[11]. These agents block cell division by inhibiting the mitotic spindles. Previous in vitro studies have shown that high level of class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) expression was associated with chemoresistance to paclitaxel, docetaxel, and vinblastine [12]. On the basis of these preclinical results, several studies have investigated the clinical role of TUBB3 in various human cancers, mostly in NSCLC [12]–[15]. To date, a large number of clinical studies have examined the relationship between the expression of TUBB3 and the clinical outcomes of taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. However, the results were still inconclusive [16]–[43]. Some studies showed a significant association between TUBB3 and taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy, while the others found no correlation. Considering the relatively small sample size and the limited statistical power of an individual study, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the expression of TUBB3 and the clinical outcomes of chemotherapy, such as the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) in NSCLC patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Literature search strategy

Relevant studies published before August 2013 were retrieved from online databases, including the PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) using the following terms and combinations: “class III β-tubulin” or “tubulin” or “TUBB3” or “lung cancer” or “neoplasm, lung”. The search was limited to full-text papers written in English or Chinese. Furthermore, the references of the retrieved studies were manually screened for additional relevant studies. If necessary, the authors of the original articles were contacted for additional data, such as the relationship between the expression level of TUBB3 and the ORR, OS, and EFS.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligible studies were identified according to the following criteria: (1) human-based investigations; (2) pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer; (3) articles published in English or Chinese; (4) taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy treatment; (5) investigation of the association between the expression of class III β-tubulin and the clinical outcomes of chemotherapy, including the ORR, OS, and EFS (including progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS)); (6) the full-text of the published articles were available. The exclusion criteria were as the follows: (1) patients younger than 18 years old; (2) studies in which necessary data were not provided; (3) for overlapped studies, the studies with a smaller dataset were excluded.

Data extraction

Two investigators (YL Yang and XP Luo) independently extracted the following information from the qualified publications: surname of the first author, publication year, country, ethnicity, sample size, disease stage, ECOG performance status, chemotherapy regimen, detection method of TUBB3, and clinical outcome (ORR, OS, or EFS). All data were then examined by two investigators independently (YL Yang and XP Luo). Disagreements between the investigators were resolved by discussion. When necessary, a third investigator (L Xian) helped to reach a consensus with all investigators.

Quality Assessment

The quality of the methodology of the included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) recommended by the Cochrane Non-Randomized Studies Methods Working Group [44]. Studies with five or more stars were defined as high quality studies. Quality assessment was performed by two investigators (YL Yang and XP Luo) independently. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

Statistical analysis

The ORR was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria [45] or the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (Good response  =  complete response + partial response; poor response  =  stable disease + progressive disease) [46]. The HRs and their 95% CIs for the OS and EFS were directly extracted from reports, or indirectly estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves, or calculated by methods described by Tierney [47]. The association between the expression of TUBB3 and the clinical responses to the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy was evaluated by the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs in the following comparison: high or positive expression of TUBB3 vs. low or negative expression of TUBB3. For the OS and EFS, the pooled HRs and 95% CIs were calculated from the HRs and 95% CIs extracted from each eligible study. Heterogeneity between studies was detected by the Q test and the I2 metric (no heterogeneity: I2 = 0%–25%; moderate heterogeneity: 25%–50%; large heterogeneity: 50%–75%; and extreme heterogeneity: 75%–100%) [48]. A fixed effect model analysis was performed when p≥0.10 in the Q test or when I2<50% [49], otherwise a random effect model analysis was conducted [50]. Subgroup analyses by ethnicity (Asian or Caucasian), chemotherapy regimen (taxane alone, vinorebine alone, or taxane and vinorebine combined), TUBB3 detection method (IHC, PCR, or Western blot), and treatment strategy (surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy or palliative chemotherapy) were also performed. Publication bias were tested by the Begg's funnel plot [51] and the Egger's test [52]. All p values were two-tailed and a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Most of the statistical analyses in this study were conducted by the STATA software (version 11.2; StataCorp, College Station, Texas USA).

Results

Eligible Studies

A total of 522 studies were identified in the initial search from the three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI). The detailed procedure of literature search was shown in Figure.1. After examining the titles and abstracts, 477 articles were excluded because they were irrelevant to this meta-analysis. The full texts of the rest 45 potentially relevant studies were carefully reviewed. As a result, 17 out of the 45 studies were excluded because of the following reasons: not taxane/vinorebine-based treatment (n = 3), data overlapping (n = 5), insufficient information (n = 4), in vitro chemosensitivity assay (n = 3), and TUBB3-tailored chemotherapy (n = 2). Therefore, 28 studies including 2401 patients were qualified for this meta-analysis [16]–[43]. The baseline characteristics of all eligible studies were reported in Table 1. The patient sample size of the included studies ranged from 19 to 577. There were 9 studies conducted in the Caucasian population [16]–[20], [27]–[30]; 19 studies were conducted in the Asian population [21]–[26], [31]–[43]; and two studies were conducted in multiple ethnicities. Several methods were used to assess the expression of TUBB3: immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 25 studies [16]–[30], [32]–[34], [36]–[42], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in two studies [16], [32], and Western blot in one study [36] (Table 1). All relevant studies were assessed by the NOS quality scale and all eligible studies scored highly (with five stars or more). The quality score of the eligible studies can be found in Table S1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature search in this meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the studies included in this meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.t001

Objective response rate

The association between the expression of TUBB3 and the treatment response to the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy was investigated in 18 studies which consisted of 954 patients [16]–[19], [22], [23], [27], [31], [34]–[43]. We found that the positive or high level of TUBB3 expression was significantly associated with a worse response to chemotherapy when compared to the negative or low level of TUBB3 in the random model analysis (positive/high vs. negative/low: OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16–0.36, p<0.001; I2 = 38.6%, P = 0.05 for heterogeneity, Table 2, Figure. 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Forest plot for the association between the expression level of TUBB3 and the objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Meta-analysis results of TUBB3 expression and the ORR, OS, and EFS in NSCLC patients receiving the taxane/vinorelbine-based chemotherapy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.t002

Stratified subgroup analysis by ethnicity, chemotherapy regimen, and TUBB3 detection method were also performed in this meta-analysis. There were 13 investigations for the Asian population that were comprised of 758 cases [22], [23], [31], [34]–[43]. In addition,five studies composed of 196 cases were conducted in the Caucasian population [16]–[19], [27]. Ethnic subgroup analysis indicated that the negative or low level of TUBB3 expression was correlated with a better chemotherapy response in both Asian (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.15–0.36, p<0.001; I2 = 37.2%, P = 0.09 for heterogeneity) and Caucasian patients (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.09–0.79, p = 0.02; I2 = 51.3%, P = 0.08 for heterogeneity, Table 2).

In the subgroup analysis by the chemotherapy regimens, 13 studies used the taxane-based regimens [16], [18], [19], [22], [23], [35], [37]–[43], four studies investigated the vinorebine-based regimens [16], [17], [36], [43], and one study examined both taxane and vinorebine-based regimens [34]. The studies by Rosell [16] and Liu [43] reported both the patients receiving the taxane-based regimen and the vinorebine-based regimen. The study by Xiao [34], however, did not provide sufficient information to distinguish the patients receiving the taxane-based chemotherapy from the patients receiving the vinorebine-based chemotherapy. Our analysis suggested that the negative or low level of TUBB3 expression showed a better response than the positive or high level of TUBB3 expression in the taxane-based regimen (positive/high vs. negative/low: OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.12–0.25, p<0.001; I2 = 23,4%, P = 0.21 for heterogeneity) and the vinorebine-based regimen (positive/high vs. negative/low: OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.31–0.93, p = 0.03; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.72 for heterogeneity). However, these associations were not found in Xiao's study, in which the analysis results were based on a mixed patient population receiving either the taxane- or vinorebine-based regimens (positive/high vs. negative/low: OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.11–1.07, p = 0.065, Table 2) [34].

In this study, 14 studies used IHC [17]-[19], [22], [23], [34], [35], [37]-[41], [43], one study used PCR [16], and one study used Western Blot [36] to detect the expression of TUBB3. Only the studies using IHC showed a significant association between the expression of TUBB3 and the ORR in patients with NSCLC (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.14–0.34, p<0.001; I2 = 39.4%, P = 0.06 for heterogeneity, Table 2).

Except for the study by Azuma K et al. that reported patients receiving surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy [22], the rest of the studies reported patients receiving palliative chemotherapy [16]–[19], [23], [27], [31], [34]–[43]. Our analysis suggested that the patients with negative or low level of TUBB3 expression had a better treatment response than those with positive or high level of TUBB3 expression in the palliative taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.14–0.37, p<0.001; I2 = 46.7%, P = 0.04 for heterogeneity, Table 2).

Overall survival

18 studies including 1879 patients evaluated the association between the expression of TUBB3 and the OS in NSCLC patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy [17], [19]–[35]. The pooled analysis indicated that the patients with positive or high level of TUBB3 had a shorter OS than the patients with negative or low level of TUBB3 (positive/high vs. negative/low: HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.27–1.82, p<0.001; I2 = 38.0%, P = 0.05 for heterogeneity, Table 2, Figure 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. Forest plot for the association between the expression level of TUBB3 and the overall survival (OS) in patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.g003

In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, we found that the expression of TUBB3 was correlated with the OS in both Asian [21]–[26], [31]–[35] (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.21–1.82, p<0.001; I2 = 13.2%, P = 0.31 for heterogeneity) and Caucasian patients [17], [19], [20], [27]–[30] (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.14–1.92, p = 0.004; I2 = 55.6%, P = 0.04 for heterogeneity, Table 2). In the subgroup analysis by chemotherapy regimen, ten studies investigated the taxane-based regimens [19], [21]–[23], [25], [26], [30], [31], [35], [53]; four reported the vinorebine-based regimens [17], [20], [32], [33]; and four studies examined both regimens [27]–[29], [34]. The results of our analysis showed that the negative or low TUBB3 expression was associated with a longer OS than the positive or high TUBB3 expression in NSCLC patients receiving the taxane-based, or vinorebine-based, or both taxane- and vinorebine-based regimens (taxane regimen: HR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.57–2.72, p<0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.71 for heterogeneity; vinorebine regimen: HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.17–1.79, p = 0.001; I2 = 37.6%, P = 0.19 for heterogeneity; taxane and vinorebine combined regimen: HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.01–1.41, p = 0.038; I2 = 39.4%, P = 0.18 for heterogeneity, Table 2). The subgroup analysis of the TUBB3 detection methods indicated that the expression of TUBB3 was significantly associated with the OS in the 16 studies using IHC as the detection method for TUBB3 [17], [19]–[23], [25]–[30], [33], [35], [53] (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.25–1.93, p<0.001; I2 = 44.0%, P = 0.03 for heterogeneity), as well as in the two studies using PCR [30], [32] (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.18–1.99, p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.85 for heterogeneity, Table 2). Additional stratified analysis based on the treatment strategy showed that the expression of TUBB3 could be used as a prognostic biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes in patients treated by surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy [20]–[22], [26], [28], [32], [33] (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13–1.55, p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P  =  0.71 for heterogeneity) and patients treated by palliative chemotherapy [17], [19], [23]–[25], [27], [29]–[31], [34], [35] (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.26–1.80, p<0.001; I2 = 36.2%, P = 0.11 for heterogeneity, Table 2)

Event free survival

A total of 14 studies composed of 1640 patients reported the event free survival (EFS) in this meta-analysis [16]–[20], [22], [23], [27]–[33], [35]. Among them, one study used the RFS as its endpoint [20], three studies examined the DFS [28], [32], [33], and the rest ten studies evaluated the PFS [16]–[19], [22], [23], [27], [29]–[31], [35]. There was strong evidence to support that the expression of TUBB3 was correlated with the EFS (positive/high vs. negative/low: HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.24–1.74, p<0.001; I2 = 37.0%, P = 0.08 for heterogeneity, Table 2, Figure 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Forest plot for the association between the expression level of TUBB3 and the event-free survival (EFS) in patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.g004

The stratified analysis by ethnicity showed that the association between TUBB3 and EFS was significant in both Asian [22], [23], [31]–[33], [35] and Caucasian populations [16], [17], [20], [27]–[30] (Asian: HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.35–2.02, p<0.001; I2 = 3.3%, P = 0.40 for heterogeneity; Caucasian: HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.10–1.46, p = 0.001; I2 = 36.3%, P = 0.14 for heterogeneity, Table 2). Among the 14 studies that reported data on EFS, eight studies used the taxane-based regimen [16], [18], [19], [22], [23], [30], [31], [35], four studies examined the vinorebine-based regimen [17], [20], [32], [33], and three studies investigated both regimens [27]–[29]. The stratified analysis by chemotherapy regimen suggested that the positive or high expression of TUBB3 was correlated with a worse EFS in patients receiving the taxane-based or vinorebine-based regimens, but not in patients treated by the taxane and vinorebine combined regimen (taxane regimen: HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.55–2.71, p<0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.50 for heterogeneity; vinorebine regimen: HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.22–1.86, p<0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.67 for heterogeneity; taxane and vinorebine combined regimen: HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.99–1.36, p = 0.075; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.67 for heterogeneity, Table 2). In the stratified analysis by TUBB3 detection method, three studies used PCR to detect TUBB3 expression [16], [30], [32] and the remaining 11 studies chose IHC to assess TUBB3 expression [17]–[20], [22], [23], [27]–[29], [31], [33], [35]. Our analysis showed that the expression of TUBB3 was significantly associated with the EFS in both groups (PCR: HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.14–1.39, p<0.001; I2 = 34.1%, P = 0.13 for heterogeneity; IHC: HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.32–2.14, p<0.001; I2 = 11.9%, P = 0.32 for heterogeneity, Table 2). In the subgroup analysis by treatment strategy, four studies evaluated the surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy [20], [28], [32], [33] and ten studies reported results from the palliative chemotherapy [16]–[18], [22], [23], [27], [29]–[31], [35]. Our analysis showed that the patients with negative or low level of TUBB3 had a longer EFS than the patients with positive or high level of TUBB3 (surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy: HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.12–1.54, p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.42 for heterogeneity; palliative chemotherapy: HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.24–2.14, p<0.001; I2 = 47.1%, P = 0.05 for heterogeneity, Table 2).

Publication bias

Publication bias was evaluated by the funnel plots qualitatively and tested by the Begg's and the Egger's tests quantitatively. Visual inspection of the Begg's funnel plots did not show significant evidences of asymmetry in the ORR, OS, and EFS (figure not shown), suggesting no publication bias in this meta-analysis. In addition, no significant bias was found in the Begg's test and the Egger's test. For the Begg's test, P was 0.17, 0.48, and 0.16 for the ORR, OS, and EFS respectively; for the Egger's test, P was 0.20, 0.07, and 0.06 for the ORR, OS, and EFS respectively (figure not shown).

Discussion

In this meta-analysis, we explored the predictive role of TUBB3 in patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy. We found that the high level of TUBB3 expression was associated with a lower objective response rate (ORR), a shorter overall survival (OS), and a worse event-free survival (EFS) compared to the low level of TUBB3 expression. Consistently, a previous meta-analysis by Zhang et al. [54] reported that TUBB3 was a biomarker for the sensitivity of paclitaxel/vinorebine-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

We think it is necessary to conduct an updated meta-analysis to re-evaluate the association between the expression of TUBB3 and the efficacy of taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy for the following reasons. First of all, the latest studies included in the previous meta-analysis by Zhang et al. [54] were published before 2009. There have been a number of studies with large patient sample size being published since 2009. In fact, our study has a much larger sample size (2401 patients from 28 studies) compared to the study by Zhang et al. (552 patients from 10 studies), which gives more reliable results in our analysis. In addition, Zhang and colleagues only examined the objective response rate and the median survival time in their analysis. In our study, we used the objective response rate, overall survival, and event free survival as the primary parameters to assess the association between the expression of TUBB3 and the clinical outcomes of taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy. Because a low ORR suggests tumor resistance to the chemotherapy regimen and a short OS/EFS indicates a poor prognosis, it is necessary to include all three parameters in order to make a comprehensive assessment about the treatment response to a chemotherapy regimen [55]. In our analysis, we demonstrated that the high level of TUBB3 expression was associated with a lower ORR, a shorter OS, and a worse EFS, which strongly supported that TUBB3 had a prognostic value in predicting the treatment response to the taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, we performed a subgroup analysis by the TUBB3 detection method and treatment strategy, which were not done in the study by Zhang and colleagues.

Microtubule is composed of polymers of tubulin dimers and plays an important role in the development and maintenance of cell polarity, vesicle and organelle transportation, cellular signaling, and cell division. Tubulin and microtubules are the main targets of the vinca alkaloids. Vinorelbine binds to the β-subunit of tubulin dimers at a distinct region called the vinca-binding domain. In contrast, paclitaxel binds to β-tubulin within the lumen of microtubule. This binding event affects a protein loop, called the M-loop, which is thought to stabilize the lateral interactions between the adjacent protofilaments of microtubule [12], [57]. Binding of taxane/vinorebine inhibits the association/dissociation of tubulin dimers in microtubule and thus disrupts the spindle dynamics, resulting in cell cycle arrest in the transition from metaphase to anaphase and eventually causes apoptotic cell death [56]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the association between the expression level of TUBB3 and the sensitivity of taxane/vinorebine chemotherapy remains an unanswered question. Further studies are needed to address this question.

Our meta-analysis showed that the overexpression of TUBB3 may be an important factor for the development of chemoresistance to taxane/vinorebine. Hence, the expression level of TUBB3 may serve as a useful biomarker in the individually-tailored personalized chemotherapy in the future. The patient with low level of TUBB3 may benefit from the taxane/vinorebine-based regimens, whereas those with high level of TUBB3 should avoid the taxane or vinorebine-based chemotherapy and replace them with chemotherapy drugs that can overcome chemoresistance, such as ixabepilone [57].

There are some limitations in our meta-analysis. Firstly, the studies included in this meta-analysis had different study designs, such as the patient selection criteria and chemotherapy protocols. Some studies included radiotherapy in addition to the chemotherapy while the others did not. These differences could contribute to the heterogeneity among those studies.

Secondly, some factors such as age, sex, smoking history, histology type, tumor stage, and treatment method may affect the prognosis in patients receiving chemotherapy treatment. However, we could not conduct a stratified analysis to assess the effects of confounding factors on the predictive role of TUBB3 in NSCLC patients because of the limited information provided in the original publications.

Moreover, the HRs and their 95% CI we extracted from the time-to-event data were not consistent. We have to estimate the HRs by reading the Kaplan-Meier curves because some studies did not report the HRs. Some studies reported the unadjusted HRs while the others provided the adjusted HRs. Moreover, the cofounders they adjusted were not the same for the adjusted HRs. All of these factors more or less contributed to the heterogeneity in this study.

At last, potential publication biases may exist. Articles were not written in English or Chinese and studies failed to get published because of negative or null results cannot be identified in our literature search and thus were not included in this analysis. In addition, some reports did not provide sufficient data were also excluded from our analysis.

In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that the expression of TUBB3 may be a useful biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes of taxane/vinorebine-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. With the limitations, heterogeneities, and bias of meta-analysis, our conclusions in this study need to be interpreted with caution. Future large prospective studies with rigorously designed methodology are warranted to confirm our results.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Checklist S1.

PRISMA checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.s001

(DOC)

Table S1.

Quality assessment of eligible studies by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997.s002

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LX YLY. Performed the experiments: YLY XPL. Analyzed the data: YLY XPL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YLY XPL. Wrote the paper: YLY XPL LX.

Citation: Yang Y-L, Luo X-P, Xian L (2014) The Prognostic Role of the Class III β-Tubulin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Receiving the Taxane/Vinorebine-Based Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(4): e93997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093997

References

1. International Agency for Research on Cancer, W.H.O (2010) The GLOBOCAN Project. Available: http://globocan.iarc.fr. (accessed 2012 Oct 12).

2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, et al. (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59: 225–249.

3. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, et al. (2012) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 220–241.

4. Guilbert JJ (2003) The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Educ Health (Abingdon) 16: 230.

5. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative G (2000) Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD002139.

6. Stewart DJ (2010) Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 75: 173–234.

7. Custodio AB, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Bobokova J, Calles A, Alvarez R, et al. (2009) Prognostic and predictive markers of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4: 891–910.

8. Chiou JF, Liang JA, Hsu WH, Wang JJ, Ho ST, et al. (2003) Comparing the relationship of Taxol-based chemotherapy response with P-glycoprotein and lung resistance-related protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung 181: 267–273.

9. Yared JA, Tkaczuk KH (2012) Update on taxane development: new analogs and new formulations. Drug Des Devel Ther 6: 371–384.

10. Galano G, Caputo M, Tecce MF, Capasso A (2011) Efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine in the cancer therapy. Curr Drug Saf 6: 185–193.

11. Felip E, Gridelli C, Baas P, Rosell R, Stahel R, et al. (2011) Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: consensus on pathology and molecular tests, first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy: 1st ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer; Lugano 2010. Ann Oncol 22: 1507–1519.

12. Seve P, Dumontet C (2008) Is class III beta-tubulin a predictive factor in patients receiving tubulin-binding agents? Lancet Oncol 9: 168–175.

13. Ferrandina G, Zannoni GF, Martinelli E, Paglia A, Gallotta V, et al. (2006) Class III beta-tubulin overexpression is a marker of poor clinical outcome in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 12: 2774–2779.

14. Tommasi S, Mangia A, Lacalamita R, Bellizzi A, Fedele V, et al. (2007) Cytoskeleton and paclitaxel sensitivity in breast cancer: the role of beta-tubulins. Int J Cancer 120: 2078–2085.

15. Urano N, Fujiwara Y, Doki Y, Kim SJ, Miyoshi Y, et al. (2006) Clinical significance of class III beta-tubulin expression and its predictive value for resistance to docetaxel-based chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Int J Oncol 28: 375–381.

16. Rosell R, Scagliotti G, Danenberg KD, Lord RV, Bepler G, et al. (2003) Transcripts in pretreatment biopsies from a three-arm randomized trial in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene 22: 3548–3553.

17. Seve P, Isaac S, Tredan O, Souquet PJ, Pacheco Y, et al. (2005) Expression of class III {beta}-tubulin is predictive of patient outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving vinorelbine-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11: 5481–5486.

18. Dumontet C, Isaac S, Souquet PJ, Bejui-Thivolet F, Pacheco Y, et al. (2005) Expression of class III beta tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer is correlated with resistance to taxane chemotherapy. Bull Cancer 92: E25–30.

19. Seve P, Mackey J, Isaac S, Tredan O, Souquet PJ, et al. (2005) Class III beta-tubulin expression in tumor cells predicts response and outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving paclitaxel. Mol Cancer Ther 4: 2001–2007.

20. Seve P, Lai R, Ding K, Winton T, Butts C, et al. (2007) Class III beta-tubulin expression and benefit from adjuvant cisplatin/vinorelbine chemotherapy in operable non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of NCIC JBR.10. Clin Cancer Res 13: 994–999.

21. Okuda K, Sasaki H, Dumontet C, Kawano O, Yukiue H, et al. (2008) Expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 and class III beta-tubulin predict survival after chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 62: 105–112.

22. Azuma K, Sasada T, Kawahara A, Takamori S, Hattori S, et al. (2009) Expression of ERCC1 and class III beta-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Lung Cancer 64: 326–333.

23. Azuma K, Sasada T, Kawahara A, Hattori S, Kinoshita T, et al. (2009) Expression of ERCC1 and class III beta-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with a combination of cisplatin/docetaxel and concurrent thoracic irradiation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64: 565–573.

24. Ikeda S, Takabe K, Suzuki K (2009) Expression of ERCC1 and class IIIbeta tubulin for predicting effect of carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Int 59: 863–867.

25. Huang CL, Kadota K, Liu D, Ueno M, Nakasima N, et al. (2010) Expression of ERCC1 and class III beta-tubulin is associated with the survival of resected stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with induction chemoradiotherapy using carboplatin-taxane. Exp Ther Med 1: 445–451.

26. Kang CH, Jang BG, Kim DW, Chung DH, Kim YT, et al. (2010) The prognostic significance of ERCC1, BRCA1, XRCC1, and betaIII-tubulin expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by platinum- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. Lung Cancer 68: 478–483.

27. Vilmar AC, Santoni-Rugiu E, Sorensen JB (2011) Class III beta-tubulin in advanced NSCLC of adenocarcinoma subtype predicts superior outcome in a randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res 17: 5205–5214.

28. Reiman T, Lai R, Veillard AS, Paris E, Soria JC, et al. (2012) Cross-validation study of class III beta-tubulin as a predictive marker for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of four randomized trials. Ann Oncol 23: 86–93.

29. Christoph DC, Kasper S, Gauler TC, Loesch C, Engelhard M, et al. (2012) betaV-tubulin expression is associated with outcome following taxane-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 107: 823–830.

30. Krawczyk P, Kowalski DM, Wojas-Krawczyk K, Mlak R, Jaskiewicz P, et al. (2012) The qualification of docetaxel or erlotinib for second-line therapy should be based on clinical and molecular predictive factors. Chemotherapy 58: 60–69.

31. Kaira K, Takahashi T, Murakami H, Shukuya T, Kenmotsu H, et al. (2013) The role of betaIII-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated by taxane-based chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 18: 371–379.

32. Jiang H, Yu XM, Zhou XM, Wang XH, Su D (2013) Correlation between microtubule-associated gene expression and chemosensitivity of patients with stage II non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Ther Med 5: 1506–1510.

33. Zhang Y, Yang H, Liu J, Deng Q, He P, et al. (2013) High expression levels of class III beta-tubulin in resected non-small cell lung cancer patients are predictive of improved patient survival after vinorelbine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncol Lett 6: 220–226.

34. Xiao YY, Song Y, Shi Y (2009) ERCC1 and class III beta-tubulin protein expression in relation to tumor and survival of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients treated with TP/NP chemotherapy regimens. Chin J Lung Cancer 12: 14–16.

35. Yang JQ, Wang BH, Liu HX (2009) Relationship between expression of III-tubulin, stathmin and drug resistance to taxane in local advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin Clin Oncol 14: 884–889.

36. Pu X, Wang J, Xu L, Ma J, Wang Z, et al. (2009) [Relationship between Expression of beta-tubulin-III Plus Stathmin in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and its Sensitivity to Venorelbine Chemotherapy.]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 12: 49–53.

37. Gong J, Liu ZL, Ha MW (2009) Expression of β-tubulin III and Bc-l2 and the clinical significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Chinese Journal of New Drugs 18: 815–818.

38. Wan YY, Hui HX, Wang XW, Sun SA, Wu J (2011) [The correlation between chemotherapeutic efficacy and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 and class IIIbeta-tubulin protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 50: 469–473.

39. Guo HQ, Zhao Y (2011) Relationship betwwen the expression level of βIII-tubulin and p53 and chemosensistivity of paclitaxel in advanced and local advanced NSCLC. Oncology Progress 9: 420–423.

40. Zhou ZS, Liao XF, Zhen QH, He HJ (2012) Expresion of Survivin、BRCA1 and class IIIβ-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship with resistance to paclitaxel. Journal of Chinese Oncology 18: 806–810.

41. Zhang JP, Hu XL, Li GF, Chen RB (2012) Relationship between expression of β-tubulin-III and drug efficacy of paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer. Medical Recapitulate 18: 2637–2638.

42. Gao LH, Mao GX (2012) The relationship between β-tubulin III expression in tumor cells and chemotherapy sensitivity of patients with NSCLC receiving paclitaxel Journal of Nantong University(Medical Sciences). 32: 188–190.

43. Liu P, Wang HX, Wang HL (2013) Relationship betweenβ-tubulin expression and paclitaxel containing regimen with drug resistance in non small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice 17: 12–15.

44. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, et al. (2003) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available: http://wwwohrica/programs/clinicalepidemiology/oxfordasp (accessed 2012 May 5).

45. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, et al. (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205–216.

46. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47: 207–214.

47. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR (2007) Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 8: 16.

48. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560.

49. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22: 719–748.

50. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177–188.

51. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50: 1088–1101.

52. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629–634.

53. Ikeda N, Nagase S, Ohira T (2009) Individualized adjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resected lung cancer and the roles of biomarkers. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15: 144–149.

54. Zhang HL, Ruan L, Zheng LM, Whyte D, Tzeng CM, et al. (2012) Association between class III beta-tubulin expression and response to paclitaxel/vinorebine-based chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 77: 9–15.

55. Oye RK, Shapiro MF (1984) Reporting results from chemotherapy trials. Does response make a difference in patient survival? JAMA 252: 2722–2725.

56. Dumontet C, Sikic BI (1999) Mechanisms of action of and resistance to antitubulin agents: microtubule dynamics, drug transport, and cell death. J Clin Oncol 17: 1061–1070.

57. Dumontet C, Jordan MA, Lee FF (2009) Ixabepilone: targeting betaIII-tubulin expression in taxane-resistant malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther 8: 17–25.