An Unusual Abscisic Acid and Gibberellic Acid Synergism Increases Somatic Embryogenesis, Facilitates Its Genetic Analysis and Improves Transformation in Medicago truncatula

Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) can be readily induced in leaf explants of the Jemalong 2HA genotype of the model legume Medicago truncatula by auxin and cytokinin, but rarely in wild-type Jemalong. Gibberellic acid (GA), a hormone not included in the medium, appears to act in Arabidopsis as a repressor of the embryonic state such that low ABA (abscisic acid): GA ratios will inhibit SE. It was important to evaluate the GA effect in M. truncatula in order to formulate generic SE mechanisms, given the Arabidopsis information. It was surprising to find that low ABA:GA ratios in M. truncatula acted synergistically to stimulate SE. The unusual synergism between GA and ABA in inducing SE has utility in improving SE for regeneration and transformation in M. truncatula. Expression of genes previously shown to be important in M. truncatula SE was not increased. In investigating genes previously studied in GA investigations of Arabidopsis SE, there was increased expression of GA2ox and decreased expression of PICKLE, a negative regulator of SE in Arabidopsis. We suggest that in M. truncatula there are different ABA:GA ratios required for down-regulating the PICKLE gene, a repressor of the embryonic state. In M. truncatula it is a low ABA:GA ratio while in Arabidopsis it is a high ABA:GA ratio. In different species the expression of key genes is probably related to differences in how the hormone networks optimise their expression.

About the Authors:

Kim E. Nolan

Affiliation: School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Youhong Song

Affiliation: School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Siyang Liao

Affiliation: School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Nasir A. Saeed

Current address: National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Affiliation: School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Xiyi Zhang

Affiliation: School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Ray J. Rose

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Introduction

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) in addition to being useful as an in vitro system to study embryogenesis has facilitated the development of clonal propagation, somatic hybridisation and transformation for the study of genes and for transgenic crops. Auxin has been the central hormone since it was shown with carrot (Daucus carota) that auxin could induce SE and then the removal of auxin or lowering of the auxin concentration facilitated embryo maturation [1]. In the perennial Medicago sativa, callus initiated by an auxin plus cytokinin followed by a pulse of the synthetic auxin 2,4-D (2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) will induce SE [2]. The auxin NAA (1-naphthalene acetic acid) and the cytokinin BAP (6-benzylaminopurine) can induce somatic embryogenesis in suitable genotypes of the model legume Medicago truncatula [3], [4]. Cytokinin is essential in M. truncatula as with auxin alone roots are initiated [5]. In addition to the hormone component, the stresses induced during the preparation of the explant are an important component of SE [6], [7]. Indeed, stress alone is capable of inducing SE in some systems [8]. In this context the stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) can induce SE in carrot root apices [9]. In M. truncatula, SE is enhanced by ABA when it is added to the auxin plus cytokinin required for SE induction [10]. This is not surprising given what is now known about how plant hormone signaling can influence gene expression [11].

Auxin and cytokinin are clearly central regulators in development in vitro and in vivo. What has been interesting in SE studies has been the demonstration that hormones not added to the medium but present in the explant’s tissue of origin or which are synthesised as a result of culture, influence the response of auxin and or cytokinin in regeneration. Ethylene is one example of a hormone which is not applied in the medium but is synthesised in culture, likely as a result of stress and auxin. Ethylene is required for auxin-induced SE in Arabidopsis [12] and auxin plus cytokinin-induced SE in M. truncatula [13]. In Arabidopsis [14] and carrot [15] gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthesis needs to be repressed as GA will act as a repressor of SE. An important early experiment in this context was the study by Ogas et al. [16] where the roots of the Arabidopsis pickle (pkl) mutant produced somatic embryos without hormones and this was repressed by GA.

In the major flowering plant model Arabidopsis, SE can be induced by auxin (synthetic auxin 2,4-D) alone in the medium [12], [17], [18] so this represents an important difference to M. truncatula. It is nevertheless informative to see the differences and commonalities with SE in the model legume M. truncatula to assist in providing a generic conceptual model of SE induction [19]. Given the importance of legumes in agriculture, it is also important to gain information that is perhaps specific to legumes, and which may increase the efficiency of transformation and regeneration in these often recalcitrant species. In M. truncatula ABA enhances SE [10] and ethylene inhibitors inhibit SE [13]. Arabidopsis shows similar responses as ABA mutants impair SE [20] and ethylene inhibitors inhibit SE [12]. Similarly a number of key genes are required for SE induction in both Arabidopsis and M. truncatula, for example WUSCHEL (WUS) [18], [21] SERK1 [22], [23] and SERF1 [12], [13]. There is however substantive work which indicates that endogenous GA needs to be down-regulated to facilitate SE [24]. Following the initial work with the pkl mutant in Arabidopsis [16] genes that induce or promote SE in Arabidopsis such as LEC transcription factors have been implicated in repressing GA activity [24], [25].

Given the importance of GA metabolism for SE in Arabidopsis and its inverse relationship with ABA [14], [15], [16], [24] it was important to investigate the GA response in M. truncatula to relate to our current understanding of the mechanism of SE in this legume model [19]. Unexpectedly, given the usual GA and ABA antagonism in physiological mechanisms [26] we found ABA and GA acted synergistically to enhance SE. We have taken advantage of this synergism to improve the transformation of M. truncatula and to probe its relationship to the expression of genes studied previously in M. truncatula and or Arabidopsis and implicated in SE. The gene expression studies indicate the subtleties involved in the timing and extent of gene expression and how networks may be modulated in different in vitro media and in different species. In Arabidopsis SE, WUS is induced by auxin [18] while WUS is induced by cytokinin in M. truncatula [21] and PICKLE (PKL) expression in Arabidopsis and in M. truncatula appears to require different ABA:GA ratios. In different species the same gene may be regulated by different hormones, so there may be considerable overlap of the genes required to be expressed for SE induction.

Results

The Effect of GA on Somatic Embryogenesis

Our standard protocol for SE is incubation in auxin plus cytokinin for three weeks then subculture into auxin plus cytokinin plus ABA. GA when applied with auxin plus cytokinin from the beginning of leaf explant incubation had little effect on SE at common physiological concentrations of 1 µM and 10 µM (Fig. 1). However, at 100 µM GA was inhibitory. We then carried out further experiments to investigate the effect of GA when ABA was given at the beginning of explant incubation to see if this would give similar results.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. The effect of GA (0, 1, 10 and 100 µM) on somatic embryogenesis induced by P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM) for three weeks before transfer to P4 10∶4∶1 (NAA:BAP:ABA in µM) shown for two experiments (a) and (b).

Five plates of each treatment with six explants per plate. Counts were made 11 weeks from the initiation of culture. Treatments with different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level; vertical bars indicate ± standard error. The numbers on the X-axis represent the GA concentration in µM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.g001

GA+ABA Enhances Somatic Embryogenesis Induced by Auxin+Cytokinin

What was unexpected was the clear enhancement of SE in the continued presence of 1 µM ABA plus different concentrations of GA (0,1,10, and 100 µM) in addition to the auxin (10 µM) plus cytokinin (4 µM), compared to the auxin (10 µM) and cytokinin (4 µM) alone (Fig. 2). This synergism between the usually antagonistic GA and ABA is most unusual. The morphology of the embryos (Fig. 3) is slightly different in that the hypocotyl is more elongated, characteristic of a GA effect on organ growth. Given that regeneration of M. truncatula could be clearly increased, further experiments were carried out using our transformation protocols [27], to examine if transformation efficiency of this legume model could be improved.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. The effect of 1 µM ABA+GA at 0, 1, 10, or 100 µM) on somatic embryogenesis induced by P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM) shown for two separate experiments (a) and (b).

Five plates of each treatment with six explants per plate. Counts were made 7 weeks after the initiation of culture. Vertical bars indicate ± standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. Somatic embryos from P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM) for 3 weeks then P4 10∶4∶1 (NAA:BAP:ABA in µM) (a) and a P4 10∶4∶1∶5 protocol (NAA:BAP:ABA:GA in µM) (b) 7 weeks after the initiation of culture.

Arrows show somatic embryos. Bar = 1 cm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.g003

Plant Transformation Test of P4 10∶4∶1∶5 Medium

Embryo accumulation after transformation using the standard P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM) for three weeks before transfer to P4 10∶4∶1 (NAA:BAP:ABA in µM), or P4 10∶4∶1∶5 medium (NAA:BAP:ABA:GA in µM) for two different constructs (see Table 1) is presented in Fig. 4. One construct had no inserted gene for transfer (null construct), while another construct had an MtOLEOSIN4 gene [28] inserted. Hygromycin was in the media as the selection agent. Somatic embryos first appeared in GA+ABA treatments and a rapid increase in numbers occurred about 20 days earlier than the standard protocol (Fig. 4a, b). A large increase in total embryo numbers occurred in the treatments with ABA+GA with both the null construct and with the construct containing the MtOLEOSIN4 gene (Fig. 4c). This showed that GA+ABA stimulated somatic embryogenesis under transformation conditions.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Time course of somatic embryo accumulation after culture initiation for transformation with the binary vector pMDC83 with a MtOLEOSIN4 gene - MtOLEOSIN4 GFP (Ole4-GFP) (a) or with no inserted gene - Null-GFP (b), and total embryos produced per callus (c) (Vertical bars indicate 95% confidence interval).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.g004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. The three phases of transformation with different media types used to culture tissue transformed with Ole4-GFP and Null-GFP constructs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.t001

Expression of Selected Genes in Response to ABA+GA Stimulation of SE

Gene expression (transcript accumulation) was compared between the auxin plus cytokinin treatments and auxin plus cytokinin with ABA + GA. There were two reasons for gene selection. One group of genes has been studied in relation to genetic regulation of SE in M. truncatula, particularly in terms of hormones (MtSERK1, MtWUS and MtSERF1), and stress (MtSK1 and MtRBOHA) influences. Another group of genes has been studied in Arabidopsis, particularly in relation to GA influences (PKL, GA2ox, LEC1) but have not been investigated in M. truncatula. MtSERK1 is auxin-induced in M. truncatula [23], MtWUS is cytokinin-induced [21] and MtSERF1 requires auxin, cytokinin and ethylene [13], [29]. The stress kinase MtSK1 is up-regulated early in embryogenic cultures [7]. The NADPH oxidase (MtRBOH protein) is an important generator of ROS and in precursor studies we established MtRBOHA was expressed in the M. truncatula SE induction period. The PKL, GA2ox, and LEC1 genes have been linked in Arabidopsis SE to a negative role for GA in SE [24].

At two weeks ABA+GA (Fig. 5a) caused a decrease in MtSERK1 gene expression with no difference at weeks one and four. MtWUS was stimulated by ABA+GA at one week (Fig. 5b), but then expression showed no significant change. Expression of the MtSERF1 transcription factor was reduced at 2 and 4 weeks by ABA+GA (Fig. 5c). The expression of MtSK1 (Fig. 5d) was unchanged by ABA+GA while the expression of MtRBOHA (Fig. 5e) was reduced at weeks 2 and 4. The M. truncatula homologue of LEC1 begins to be expressed at week 4 when embryos are just starting to develop. There is a large standard error (Fig. 5f) and there is no significant effect of ABA+GA at this time point.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 5. Comparisons of gene expression between P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM) and P4 10∶4∶1∶5 (NAA:BAP:ABA:GA in µM) treatments (shown as 0∶0 and 1∶5 respectively).

Gene expression for cultured tissues at 1, 2 and 4 weeks was calibrated to expression in young leaf tissue (the explant source given the relative expression of 1) for all genes except MtLEC1, which is not expressed in leaf. MtLEC1 expression was calibrated to expression at 4 weeks in P4 10∶4∶1∶5 medium. Treatments with different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level; vertical bars indicate ± standard errors from three biological repeats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.g005

Of particular interest in relation to the ABA+GA response was the expression of PICKLE a negative regulator of SE which was decreased at week 2 and 4 (Fig. 5g) and the increased expression of GA2ox at all time points (Fig. 5h).

Discussion

The Utility of the GA+ABA Synergism

GA+ABA usually act antagonistically, with GA frequently stimulating a process and ABA inhibiting [25], [26]. In the case of SE the antagonism is the converse, in general ABA being a positive regulator of SE and GA being a negative regulator of SE [24]. To an extent this latter GA:ABA antagonism is evident in M. truncatula at high concentrations of GA where it is inhibitory (Fig. 1) and ABA where there is a small stimulation (Fig. 2). However, surprisingly, in the M. truncatula system when ABA and GA are applied together from the beginning of culture, GA by interacting with ABA, greatly enhances SE in a synergistic fashion. This is discussed below in the context of gene expression.

While stable transformation of M. truncatula 2HA based on SE systems has been available for a long time [30], the efficiency could still be improved. In particular there is an increasing need for high throughput transformation in plant biology, so it was important to check that the addition of GA and ABA carried through in M. truncatula transformation systems, and this was the case. We have found the new medium more robust in subsequent transformation work, as well as embryogenesis occurring more quickly and in total numbers of embryos formed (Fig. 2, Fig. 3).

Transformation of a number of legume species is possible and transgenic soybean is well established. However the routine genetic transformation in the generally recalcitrant legumes remains difficult [33]. The findings of GA+ABA synergism in the model legume M. truncatula could prove useful in improving transformation, in at least some legume species.

Gene Expression and Implications for the GA+ABA Response

Previous studies in M. truncatula on MtSERK1, MtWUS and MtSERF1 have pointed to important roles in SE [19]. It was possible that GA+ABA increased expression of these genes to enhance SE but there is no substantive evidence for this. MtSERK1 expression is associated with developmental change such that it increases expression in callus formation and in early embryo development [34]. In Arabidopsis overexpression of SERK1 increases SE [22]. The data here show that GA+ABA cause a slight alteration in the expression pattern but there is no increase in expression. There is evidence that WUS expression is associated with the formation of totipotent stem cells in both M. truncatula [21] and Arabidopsis [18]. Importantly, MtWUS is cytokinin-induced while WUS is auxin-induced in Arabidopsis. In Arabidopsis it has been shown that WUS acts as a transcriptional repressor to induce SE in roots [35]. The increased early expression at one week could represent an enhancement of this early phase by GA+ABA. Apart from GA2ox, MtWUS is the only case of increased expression at one week in ABA+GA treatments. A requirement for MtSERF1 for SE has been shown for M. truncatula [13] and for soybean and Arabidopsis [12]. In M. truncatula there is a wave of MtSERF1 expression in the embryogenic 2HA peaking after 2–3 weeks of culture, and there is low expression after 4 weeks [13]. MtSERF1 is also expressed in zygotic embryogenesis [13]. However ABA+GA do not enhance the expression of this ethylene-responsive gene. Expression of the MtSERF1 gene in the presence of ABA+GA at week 4 is quite low, reflecting the end of a transcriptional wave as the embryo morphology develops. MtSERF1 expression becomes confined to the shoot apical region [13], and transcription factors such as LEC1 start to be expressed (Fig. 5f) for embryo maturation and seed filling.

The MtSK1 stress kinase gene is induced by wounding the tissue [7] and the further addition of ABA+GA does not change MtSK1 expression (Fig. 5d). However the MtRBOHA expression is reduced by ABA+GA suggesting that there is modulation of ROS production. While ROS may have a signaling role in SE in relation to stress [36], [37] excessive ROS can lead to cell death [38]. The results here could reflect a decreased stress response and shorter recovery consistent with the faster and more efficient SE response. This may well be a contributing factor, but given the literature on GA and ABA [16], [24], [25], [39] and the data here on PKL and GA2ox, the GA and ABA interaction point to other important regulatory areas.

Investigations of mechanisms of Arabidopsis SE have indicated an important role for reducing GA levels [15], [16], [24], [39]. The GA data we obtained seems incompatible with the Arabidopsis studies given that GA represses the embryonic state [39]. However there are commonalities in that GA2ox is stimulated and PKL expression is reduced in weeks 2 and 4. GA2ox was also up-regulated in microarray studies of M. truncatula embryogenic cultures induced from auxin + cytokinin treated protoplasts [13]. GA2ox was first isolated in the legume Phaseolus coccineus (runner bean) and bioactive GA levels can be reduced by the action of this gene resulting in a range of dwarf phenotypes when overexpressed in Arabidopsis and wheat [40]. GA2-oxidases are involved in a major GA inactivation pathway [41]. In the case of M. truncatula GA2ox is possibly stimulated to inactivate some of the bioactive GA but still producing suitable ABA:GA ratios for the SE response, or alternatively having additional roles in Medicago. Over expression of LEC transcription factors can induce SE in the Arabidopsis situation [42] possibly in part because of its capacity to repress GA levels [24] and influence ABA:GA ratios. However, there is no LEC1 expression in the M. truncatula SE induction phase. Clearly future studies need to analyse actual intracellular bioactive GA and ABA levels.

Henderson et al. [39] have proposed that PKL, a repressor of the embryonic state, must be down-regulated to facilitate SE induction [16]. PKL is a chromatin remodeling factor that promotes histone methylation to repress transcription [43], [44]. Why then are high exogenous ABA:GA ratios required for SE in Arabidopsis [24] but low ABA:GA ratios in M. truncatula? One possibility is that the PKL gene must be repressed in both Arabidopsis and M. truncatula but it is regulated by different ABA:GA intracellular ratios. This would allow derepression of the embryogenesis genes by chromatin remodeling [44] in both cases. Manipulating PKL levels in Medicago would help resolve the SE relationship.

The current study with M. truncatula, taken together with previous investigations, indicates that auxin or auxin plus cytokinin dependent SE requires appropriate levels of other endogenous hormones. In M. truncatula [13], Arabidopsis and soybean [12], [45] suitable levels of ethylene as well as suitable GA:ABA ratios appear necessary [14], [24]. In different species or cultivars the same gene may be regulated by different hormones or different hormone ratios in regulating SE. In Arabidopsis SE auxin induces WUS [18] while it is cytokinin in M. truncatula [21]; in Arabidopsis down-regulation of PKL expression is linked to high ABA:GA ratios [39] and low ABA:GA ratios in M. truncatula. It is reasonable to assume that gene networks provide the co-ordination that is characteristic of the species. With extensive experimentation of SE in a number of systems including Arabidopsis [12], [46], [47], Medicago [19], Brassica [48] and Norway spruce [49] as well as high throughput studies in a range of species such as potato [50] and the rubber tree [51]; it should be possible to develop a better understanding of the way different gene networks can regulate SE in the species of interest.

Conclusions

The ABA and GA synergism in enhancing somatic embryogenesis in M. truncatula has implications for facilitating transformation and in understanding the mechanism of SE. Stable transformation in M. truncatula (as opposed to transgenic hairy roots) is still not readily utilised in this model legume and enhanced regeneration is very helpful in this regard. The M. truncatula findings may well be useful for transformation of other legumes. While more detailed analysis of the PICKLE gene (a likely repressor of the embryonic state) is required, it is of particular interest that this gene is down-regulated by using low ABA:GA ratios in M. truncatula whereas high ABA:GA ratios are required in Arabidopsis. Different species may require a different hormone complement in order to regulate the same key genes central to SE in higher plants.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

M. truncatula 2HA plants were glasshouse grown with night/day temperatures of 19/23°C and day length of 14 h.

Tissue Culture

The details of culturing 2HA leaves for producing somatic embryos were as described by Nolan and Rose [10], [52]. 2HA leaves were sterilised and explants cut as described [52] and plated abaxial side down on the culture plate. The standard culture media is P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM) for the first 3 wks and P4 10∶4∶1 (NAA:BAP:ABA in µM) for the remainder of culture with sub-culturing every 3–4 weeks [10]. GA was added to the experimental medium at concentrations indicated. The GA+ABA gene expression experiments used P4 10∶4∶1∶5 (NAA:BAP:ABA:GA in µM) for the whole culture period with the control P4 10∶4 (NAA:BAP in µM). Sub-culturing was performed every 3–4 weeks.

Sample Collection for Gene Expression Studies

The calli in culture plates were harvested at 1, 2 and 4 weeks. The tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept in a −80°C freezer for later use.

Plant Transformation Tests

The method of Medicago transformation was as described by Nolan et al. [34] and Song et al. [27]. In the transformation, there are three phases i) coculturing leaf explants and the AGL1 Agrobacterium strain using P4 10∶4 medium for 2 days ii) culturing using P4 10∶4 plus timentin and selection antibiotic hygromycin for 3 weeks iii) culturing using P4 10∶4∶1 plus timentin and hygromycin with sub culturing every 3–4 weeks. In the ABA+GA treatment, we used P4 10∶4∶1∶5 to replace P4 10∶4 and P4 10∶4∶1 and kept the same antibiotics (see Table 1). A construct of MtOLEOSIN4 GFP (Ole4-GFP) and its control GFP (Null-GFP) in the Gateway compatible binary vector pMDC83 was used for transformation tests.

Expression of Somatic Embryogenesis Related Genes

The time points selected represented leaf explants undergoing dedifferentication (1 week), callus formation (2 week) and transition to somatic embryo emergence (4 week) based on our previous studies [7], [19]. To maintain consistency with 1 week and 2 weeks, we did not add ABA at 3 weeks to the auxin and cytokinin controls in the gene expression studies, focusing on the large ABA+GA effect (when added to auxin and cytokinin) relative to auxin and cytokinin alone.

RNA was isolated from sampled calli using the RNAqueous-4PCR kit (Ambion) and DNase treated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Synthesis of cDNA was performed with a SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen) using 2 µg of total RNA and oligo (dT) primers. The cDNA was diluted 1∶25 for quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) reactions. All qRT-PCR reactions were prepared using a CAS1200 robot (Qiagen) and run on a Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen). Primers (Table B in File S1) were designed using Primer3 and used to amplify specific genes. Information on the individual genes [7], [13], [21], [23], [53], [54] can be found in Tables A and C in File S1. Reactions were performed in duplicate (15 µL sample volume) using Platinum Taq PCR polymerase, 2 µM SYTO9 fluorescent dye (Invitrogen), primers at 0.4 µm and 0.2 mM dNTPs. PCR cycling conditions were 94°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. Disassociation analysis was performed for each run to verify the amplification of a specific product. The GAPDH gene was used as a calibrator. GAPDH is a suitable reference gene for M. truncatula based on geNORM software [55] and our previous microarray and qRT-PCR studies on SE [13]. Three biological repeats were carried out with duplicate reactions. PCR efficiency of each run was calculated using the LinRegPCR program [56]. Relative expression was calculated using the Pfaffl method [57]. Expression of all genes except MtLEC1 was calibrated to expression in explant source leaf tissue (given the relative expression of 1). MtLEC1 expression was calibrated to expression in P4 10∶4∶1∶5 medium at 4 weeks as MtLEC1 has no detectable expression in leaf tissue. Results shown are means ± SE of three biological repeats.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis on the comparison between multiple treatments was performed by comparing means in JMP10.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

File S1.

Table A: Medicago gene name and locus. Table B: qRT-PCR primer sequences. Table C: Medicago gene loci and Arabidopsis homologues.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908.s001

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RJR KEN YS. Performed the experiments: KEN YS SL NAS XZ. Analyzed the data: KEN YS NAS RJR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RJR KEN. Wrote the paper: RJR KEN YS.

Citation: Nolan KE, Song Y, Liao S, Saeed NA, Zhang X, Rose RJ (2014) An Unusual Abscisic Acid and Gibberellic Acid Synergism Increases Somatic Embryogenesis, Facilitates Its Genetic Analysis and Improves Transformation in Medicago truncatula. PLoS ONE 9(6): e99908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099908

References

1. Halperin W (1964) Morphogenetic studies with partially synchronized cultures of carrot embryos. Science 146: 408–410.

2. Dudits D, Bögre L, Györgyey J (1991) Molecular and cellular approaches to the analysis of plant embryo development from somatic cells in vitro. J Cell Sci 99: 475–484.

3. Nolan KE, Rose RJ, Gorst JR (1989) Regeneration of Medicago truncatula from tissue culture: increased somatic embryogenesis from regenerated plants. Plant Cell Rep 8: 278–281.

4. Rose RJ, Nolan KE, Bicego L (1999) The development of the highly regenerable seed line Jemalong 2HA for transformation of Medicago truncatula - Implications for regenerability via somatic embryogenesis. J Plant Physiol 155: 788–791.

5. Rose RJ, Wang X-D, Nolan KE, Rolfe BG (2006) Root meristems in Medicago truncatula tissue culture arise from vascular-derived procambial-like cells in a process regulated by ethylene. J Exp Bot 57: 2227–2235.

6. Fehér A, Pasternak TP, Dudits D (2003) Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue & Organ Cult 74: 201–228.

7. Nolan KE, Saeed NA, Rose RJ (2006) The stress kinase gene MtSK1 in Medicago truncatula with particular reference to somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep 25: 711–722.

8. Kamada H, Ishikawa K, Saga H, Harada H (1993) Induction of somatic embryogenesis in carrot by osmotic stress. Plant Tiss Cult Lett 10: 38–44.

9. Nishiwaki M, Fujino K, Koda Y, Masuda K, Kikuta Y (2000) Somatic embryogenesis induced by the simple application of abscisic acid. Planta 211: 756–759.

10. Nolan KE, Rose RJ (1998) Plant regeneration from cultured Medicago truncatula with particular reference to abscisic acid and light treatments. Aust J Bot 46: 151–160.

11. Santner A, Estelle M (2009) Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signaling. Nature 459: 1071–1078.

12. Zheng Q, Zheng Y, Perry SE (2013) AGAMOUS-Like15 promotes somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis and soybean in part by the control of ethylene biosynthesis and response. Plant Physiol 161: 2113–2127.

13. Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S, Lohar DP, Sharapova N, Saeed NA, et al. (2008) The transcription factor MtSERF1 of the ERF subfamily identified by transcriptional profiling is required for somatic embryogenesis induced by auxin plus cytokinin in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 146: 1622–1636.

14. Wang H, Caruso LV, Downie AB, Perry SE (2004) The embryo MADS domain protein AGAMOUS-Like 15 directly regulates expression of a gene encoding an enzyme involved in gibberellin metabolism. Plant Cell 16: 1206–1219.

15. Tokuji Y, Kuriyama K (2003) Involvement of gibberellin and cytokinin in the formation of embryogenic cell clumps in carrot (Daucus carota). J Plant Physiol 160: 133–141.

16. Ogas J, Cheng JC, Sung ZR, Somerville C (1997) Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science 277: 91–94.

17. Ikeda-Iwai M, Umehara M, Satoh S, Kamada H (2003) Stress-induced somatic embryogenesis in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 34: 107–114.

18. Su YH, Zhao XY, Liu YB, Zhang CL, O’Neill SD, et al. (2009) Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 59: 448–460.

19. Rose RJ, Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S, Chen S-G, Wang X-D, et al. (2010) The developmental biology of somatic embryogenesis. In: Pua EC, Davey MR, editors. Plant developmental biology: biotechnology perspectives. Volume 2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 3–26.

20. Gaj MD, Trojanowska A, Ujzak A, Mędrek M, Koziol A, et al. (2006) Hormone-response mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. impaired in somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regul 49: 183–197.

21. Chen S-K, Kurdyukov S, Kereszt A, Wang X-D, Gresshoff PM, et al. (2009) The association of homeobox gene expression with stem cell formation and morphogenesis in cultured Medicago truncatula. Planta 230: 827–840.

22. Hecht V, Vielle-Calzada JP, Hartog MV, Schmidt ED, Boutilier K, et al. (2001) The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiol 127: 803–816.

23. Nolan KE, Irwanto RR, Rose RJ (2003) Auxin up-regulates MtSERK1 expression in both Medicago truncatula root-forming and embryogenic cultures. Plant Physiol 133: 218–230.

24. Braybrook SA, Harada JJ (2008) LECs go crazy in embryo development. Trends in Plant Sci 13: 624–630.

25. Curaba J, Moritz T, Blervaque R, Parcy F, Raz V, et al. (2004) AtGA3ox2, a key gene responsible for bioactive gibberellin synthesis, is regulated during embryogenesis by LEAFCOTYLEDON2 and FUSCA3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 136: 3660–3669.

26. Weis D, Ori N (2007) Mechanism of cross-talk between gibberellin and other hormones. Plant Physiol 144: 1240–1246.

27. Song Y, Nolan KE, Rose RJ (2013) Stable transformation of Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong for gene analysis using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In: Rose RJ, editor, Legume genomics, methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology series 1069. New York: Humana Press, Springer. 203–214.

28. Wang X-D, Song Y, Sheahan MB, Garg ML, Rose RJ (2012) From embryo sac to oil and protein bodies: embryo development in the model legume Medicago truncatula. New Phytol 193: 327–338.

29. Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S, Chen S-K, Rose RJ (2008) The transcription factor MtSERF1 may function as a nexus between stress and development in somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Signal & Behav 37: 498–500.

30. Thomas MR, Rose RJ, Nolan KE (1992) Genetic transformation of Medicago truncatula using Agrobacterium with genetically modified Ri and disarmed Ti plasmids. Plant Cell Rep 11: 113–117.

31. Wang JH, Rose RJ, Donaldson BI (1996) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and expression of foreign genes in Medicago truncatula. Aust J Plant Physiol 23: 265–270.

32. Chabaud M, Larsonneau C, Marmouget C, Huguet T (1996) Transformation of barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and regeneration via somatic embryogenesis of transgenic plants with the MtENOD12 nodulin promoter fused to the gus reporter gene. Plant Cell Rep 15: 305–310.

33. Yamada T, Takagi K, Ishimoto M (2012) Recent advances in soybean transformation and their application to molecular breeding and genomic analysis. Breeding Sci 61: 480–494.

34. Nolan KE, Kurdyukov S, Rose RJ (2009) Expression of the Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor-Like Kinase 1 (SERK1) gene is associated with developmental change in the life cycle of the model legume Medicago truncatula. J Exp Bot 60: 1759–1771.

35. Ikeda M, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M (2009) Arabidopsis WUSCHEL is a bifunctional transcription factor that acts as a repressor in stem cell regulation and as an activator in floral patterning. Plant Cell 21: 3493–3505.

36. Pasternak TP, Ötvös K, Domoki D, Fehér A (2007) Linked activation of cell division and oxidative stress defense in alfalfa leaf protoplast-derived cells is dependent on exogenous auxin. Plant Growth Regul 51: 109–117.

37. Rose RJ, Sheahan MB, Tiew TW-Y (2013) Connecting stress to development in the induction of somatic embryogenesis. In: Aslam J, Srivastava PS, Sharma MP, Somatic embryogenesis and gene expression. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House. 146–165.

38. Neill S, Desikan R, Hancock J (2002) Hydrogen peroxide signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 388–395.

39. Henderson JT, Li HC, Rider SD, Mordhorst AP, Romero-Severson J, et al. (2004) PICKLE acts throughout the plant to repress expression of embryonic traits and may play a role in gibberellin-dependent responses. Plant Physiol 134: 995–1005.

40. Hedden P, Phillips AL (2000) Gibberellin metabolism: new insights revealed by the genes. Trends Plant Sci 5: 523–530.

41. Rieu I, Eriksson S, Powers SJ, Gong F, Griffiths J, et al. (2008) Genetic analysis reveals that C19–GA 2-oxidation is a major gibberellin inactivation pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 2420–2436.

42. Lotan T, Ohto M, Yee KM, West MAL, Lo R, et al. (1998) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93: 1195–1205.

43. Zhang H, Bishop B, Ringenberg W, Muir WM, Ogas J (2012) The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE associates with genes enriched for trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. Plant Physiol 159: 418–432.

44. Zhang H, Rider Jr SD, Henderson JT, Fountain N, Chuang K, et al. (2008) The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE promotes trimethylation of histone H3 Lysine 27. J Biol Chem 283: 22637–22648.

45. Zheng Q, Zheng Y, Perry SE (2013) Decreased GmAGL1 expression and reduced ethylene synthesis may contribute to reduced somatic embryogenesis in a poorly embryogenic cultivar of Glycine max. Plant Signal Behav 8: e25422.

46. Braybrook SA, Stone SL, Park S, Bui AQ, Le BH, et al. (2006) Genes directly regulated by LEAFY COTYLEDON2 provide insight into the control of embryo maturation and somatic embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 3468–3473.

47. Gliwicka M, Nowak K, Balazadeh S, Mueller-Roeber B, Gaj MD (2013) Extemsive modulation of the transcription factor transcriptome during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plos one 8: e69261.

48. Elhiti M, Tahir M, Gulden RH, Khamis K, Stassola C (2010) Modulation of embryo-forming capacity in culture through the expression of Brassica genes involved in the regulation of the shoot apical meristem. J Exp Bot 61: 4069–4085.

49. Bozhkov PV, Filonova LH, Suarez MF, Helmersson A, Smertenko AP, et al. (2004) VEIDase is a principal caspase-like activity involverd in plant programmed cell death and essential for embryonc pattern formation. Cell Death and Differentiation 11: 175–182.

50. Sharma SK, Millam S, Hedley PE, McNicol J, Bryan GJ (2008) Molecular regulation of somatic embryogenesis in potato: an auxin led perspective. Plant Mol Biol 68: 185–201.

51. Piyatrakul P, Putrano R-A, Martin F, Rio M, Dessailly F, et al. (2012) Some ethylene biosynthesis and AP2/ERF genes reveal a specific pattern of expression during somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis. BMC Plant Biology 12: 244.

52. Nolan KE, Rose RJ (2010) Plant regeneration - somatic embryogenesis. In: Davey MR, Anthony P, editors, Plant cell culture. essential methods. Chichester U.K: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 39–59.

53. Song Y (2013) Genetic regulation of embryo development and formation of seed storage products in the legume model Medicago truncatula. PhD thesis. The University of Newcastle. Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

54. Marino D, Andrio E, Danchin EGJ, Oger E, Gucciardo S, et al. (2011) A Medicago truncatula NADPH oxidase is involved in symbiotic nodule functioning. New Phytol 189: 580–592.

55. Verdier J, Kakar K, Gallardo K, Le Signor C, Aubert G, et al. (2008) Gene expression profiling of M. truncatula transcription factors identifies putative regulators of grain legume seed filling. Plant Mol Biol 67: 567–580.

56. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Lekanne Deprez RH, Moorman AFM (2003) Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neuroscience Lett 339: 62–66.

57. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45.