It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Separate research streams have identified synchrony and arousal as two factors that might contribute to the effects of human rituals on social cohesion and cooperation. But no research has manipulated these variables in the field to investigate their causal – and potentially interactive – effects on prosocial behaviour. Across four experimental sessions involving large samples of strangers, we manipulated the synchronous and physiologically arousing affordances of a group marching task within a sports stadium. We observed participants’ subsequent movement, grouping, and cooperation via a camera hidden in the stadium’s roof. Synchrony and arousal both showed main effects, predicting larger groups, tighter clustering, and more cooperative behaviour in a free-rider dilemma. Synchrony and arousal also interacted on measures of clustering and cooperation such that synchrony only encouraged closer clustering—and encouraged greater cooperation—when paired with physiological arousal. The research helps us understand why synchrony and arousal often co-occur in rituals around the world. It also represents the first use of real-time spatial tracking as a precise and naturalistic method of simulating collective rituals.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Bilkey, David 3 ; Whitehouse, Harvey 4 ; Zollmann, Stefanie 5 ; McNaughton, Craig 6 ; Halberstadt, Jamin 3 1 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
2 Institute for Evolutionary and Cognitive Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Research Centre for Psychology, Behaviour and Achievement, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
3 Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
4 Institute for Evolutionary and Cognitive Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Animation Research Limited, Dunedin, New Zealand
6 Animation Research Limited, Dunedin, New Zealand




