Content area
Full Text
Based on the her experiences of completing a doctoral study in which semi-structured interviews featured as the primary data collection method, Christine Dearnley offers a reflective insight into using semi-structured interviews as a method of data collection. The processes of reflection in, and on, the interview process are explored, and some of the ethical dilemmas that emerged during the study are reflected on. The practicalities of conducting semi-structured interviews are considered with a view to sharing new understandings of the process and its management
key words
* semi-structured interviews
* reflection
* ethical issues
* practicalities
Background to the study
Clinical colleagues and I believed that many students exiting the open learning enrolled nurse conversion course (OLENCC). offered by my university, had undergone personal and professional change while undertaking the programme. I developed the study to investigate the relationship between the open learning (OL) mode of course delivery and personal and professional development exhibited by learners.
The study was based on an overarching research question: 'What explains how the processes of open learning influence the personal and professional development of enrolled nurses returning to study?' I took a pragmatic and eclectic approach within an action research (AR) framework (Carr and Kemmis 1986, McNiff 1988). Data collection and analysis spanned a two-year period, starting in 1999. The processes of constant comparative analysis (Strauss and Corbin 1998) were applied to explore the underlying concepts and their relationships.
The ethical basis of the study was guided by the philosophy of equity, participation and collaboration (Harding 1987, Stanley and Wise 1993, Maynard and Purvis 1994. Carr and Kemmis 1986, McNiff 1988). They were articulated in three basic principles, suggested by House (1990). These were:
* Mutual respect - understanding others' aims and interests, not damaging self-esteem, and not being condescending
* Non-coercion and non-manipulation - not using force or threats or leading others to co-operate when it is against their interests
* Support for democratic values and institutions - commitment to equality and liberty.
The School of Health Ethics Panel at the university that was to be the prime site of enquiry granted ethical approval. Formal permission was obtained to enter all research fields. Anonymity and confidentiality were assured to the participants, and written consent for publication of...