Content area

Abstract

Using the size of CEO signatures in SEC filings to measure individual narcissism, we find that CEO narcissism is associated with several negative firm outcomes. We first validate signature size as a measure of narcissism but not overconfidence using two laboratory studies, and also find that our measure is correlated with employee perceptions of CEO narcissism used in prior research. We then use CEO signatures to study the relation between CEO narcissism and the firm’s investment policies and performance. CEO narcissism is associated with overinvestment, particularly in R&D and M&A expenditures (but not in capital expenditures). Firms led by narcissistic CEOs experience lower financial productivity in the form of profitability and operating cash flows. Despite this negative performance, narcissistic CEOs enjoy higher absolute and relative compensation. Our results are robust to several alternative specifications, including controlling for a popular options-based overconfidence measure used in prior research.

Details

Title
Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance
Author
Ham, Charles 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Seybert, Nicholas 2 ; Wang, Sean 3 

 John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA 
 Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 
 Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA 
Pages
234-264
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Mar 2018
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
13806653
e-ISSN
15737136
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2010715976
Copyright
Review of Accounting Studies is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.