WFS1 mutation screening in a large series of Japanese hearing loss patients: Massively parallel DNA sequencing-based analysis

Abstract

A heterozygous mutation in the Wolfram syndrome type 1 gene (WFS1) causes autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hereditary hearing loss, DFNA6/14/38, or Wolfram-like syndrome. To date, more than 40 different mutations have been reported to be responsible for DFNA6/14/38. In the present study, WFS1 variants were screened in a large series of Japanese hearing loss (HL) patients to clarify the prevalence and clinical characteristics of DFNA6/14/38 and Wolfram-like syndrome. Massively parallel DNA sequencing of 68 target genes was performed in 2,549 unrelated Japanese HL patients to identify genomic variations responsible for HL. The detailed clinical features in patients with WFS1 variants were collected from medical charts and analyzed. We successfully identified 13 WFS1 variants in 19 probands: eight of the 13 variants were previously reported mutations, including three mutations (p.A684V, p.K836N, and p.E864K) known to cause Wolfram-like syndrome, and five were novel mutations. Variants were detected in 15 probands (2.5%) in 602 families with presumably autosomal dominant or mitochondrial HL, and in four probands (0.7%) in 559 sporadic cases; however, no variants were detected in the other 1,388 probands with autosomal recessive or unknown family history. Among the 30 individuals possessing variants, marked variations were observed in the onset of HL as well as in the presence of progressive HL and tinnitus. Vestibular symptoms, which had been rarely reported, were present in 7 out of 30 (23%) of the affected individuals. The most prevalent audiometric configuration was low-frequency type; however, some individuals had high-frequency HL. Haplotype analysis in three mutations (p.A716T, p.K836T, and p.E864K) suggested that the mutations occurred at these mutation hot spots. The present study provided new insights into the audiovestibular phenotypes in patients with WFS1 mutations.

About the Authors:

Masafumi Kobayashi

Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan

Maiko Miyagawa

Roles Investigation, Validation

Affiliations Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan, Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan

Shin-ya Nishio

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan, Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan

Hideaki Moteki

Roles Investigation, Validation

Affiliations Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan, Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan

Taro Fujikawa

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Kenji Ohyama

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai, Japan

Hirofumi Sakaguchi

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Ikuyo Miyanohara

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan

Akiko Sugaya

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan

Yasushi Naito

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Kobe City Medical Center, Kobe, Japan

Shin-ya Morita

Roles Investigation

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan

Yukihiko Kanda

Roles Investigation

Affiliation: Kanda ENT Clinic, Nagasaki Bell Hearing Center, Nagasaki, Japan

Masahiro Takahashi

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

Kotaro Ishikawa

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Yuki Nagano

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Tetsuya Tono

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Chie Oshikawa

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Chiharu Kihara

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

Haruo Takahashi

Roles Investigation, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

Yoshihiro Noguchi

Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan

Shin-ichi Usami

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan, Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan

ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5068-6122

Introduction

Hearing loss (HL) is the most prevalent sensory impairment, and is reported to occur at a rate of 1.86 per 1000 newborns [1]. HL can be caused by environmental and/or hereditary factors. Hereditary HL accounts for 68% of congenital HL cases, and for 54% of HL at the age of four years [1]. In addition, 70% of hereditary HL cases show nonsyndromic HL, without any associated symptoms. The inheritance pattern of this nonsyndromic hereditary HL is divided into autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, X-linked, and mitochondrial. Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic HL (ADNSHL) occurs in approximately 20% of nonsyndromic hereditary HL cases [2]. It is genetically heterogeneous, and 36 causative genes for ADNSHL have been identified to date [3].

Heterozygous mutations in the Wolfram syndrome type 1 gene (WFS1) are responsible for one form of ADNSHL, DFNA6/14/38 (MIM #600965) [4], and Wolfram-like syndrome (MIM #614296) [5–7]. WFS1 was first identified as a causative gene for the autosomal recessive disorder Wolfram syndrome type 1 (MIM #222300), or DIDMOAD (diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness) syndrome [8, 9]. WFS1 is located on chromosome 4p16.1, contains eight exons, and encodes wolframin, which is an 890-amino acid transmembrane protein. Biochemical studies suggest that wolframin is localized predominantly in the endoplasmic reticulum, and plays a role in membrane trafficking, protein processing and/or regulation of endoplasmic reticulum calcium homeostasis [10]. Immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies in the mouse inner ear revealed that wolframin is expressed in various cell types in the cochlea and vestibule from postnatal day 1 to 35, and it is thought to play a possible role in inner ear ion (K⁺ and/or Ca²⁺) homeostasis [11].

To date, over 40 different heterozygous mutations in WFS1 have been reported to cause DFNA6/14/38, with the majority of the mutations located in exon 8 [12–15]. The audiometric configuration of DFNA6/14/38 patients is characterized by symmetrical, low-frequency sensorineural HL with or without progression. The onset of HL varies widely from prelingual to the early 30s. By contrast, vestibular impairments and/or vestibular function abnormalities are extremely rare associated symptoms among DFNA6/14/38 patients, and only one paper has reported affected individuals showing vertiginous attacks [16]. Some heterozygous mutations in WFS1 can cause Wolfram-like syndrome, which is characterized by autosomal dominant inherited HL with optic atrophy and/or diabetes mellitus [5–7].

We previously screened for WFS1 variants in 206 Japanese ADNSHL and 64 autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hereditary HL (ARNSHL) probands, and identified two previously reported mutations in three unrelated families with ADNSHL [17]. In the present study, we used massively parallel DNA sequencing (MPS) for the mutational analysis of the WFS1 gene among a larger series of 2,549 unrelated Japanese hereditary HL patients. The aims of the study were to estimate the prevalence of WFS1 mutations in the Japanese hereditary HL population, and provide a more precise description of the clinical features. Additionally, haplotype analysis was performed on three missense mutations identified in multiple families to confirm whether these mutations occurred in a mutational hotspot.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Sixty-seven otolaryngology departments across Japan participated in the present study, and a total of 2,549 unrelated Japanese patients (probands) with HL were enrolled. The inheritance pattern of HL in the probands’ families was assumed to be autosomal dominant or mitochondrial inheritance in 602 families, autosomal recessive in 1,018, sporadic in 559, and unknown in 370. Low-frequency sensorineural HL based on pure-tone audiograms as defined previously [18] was recognized in 55 of 602 probands with autosomal dominant HL, and in 67 of 1,577 probands with autosomal recessive or sporadic HL.

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (or from their next of kin, caretaker, or guardian in the case of minors/children) prior to enrollment in this study. All procedures were approved by the Shinshu University Ethical Committee as well as the respective Ethical Committees of the other participating institutions

Mutational analysis

Amplicon libraries were prepared using an Ion AmpliSeq™ Custom Panel (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, for 68 genes reported to cause non-syndromic hereditary HL (S1 Table). The detailed protocol has been described elsewhere [19]. After preparation, the amplicon libraries were diluted to 20pM and equal amounts of 6 libraries for 6 patients were pooled for one sequence reaction.

Emulsion PCR and sequencing were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The detailed protocol has been described elsewhere [19]. MPS was performed with an Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) system using an Ion PGM™ 200 Sequencing Kit and an Ion 318™ Chip (Life Technologies).

The sequence data were mapped against the human genome sequence (build GRCh37/hg19) with a Torrent Mapping Alignment Program. After sequence mapping, the DNA variant regions were piled up with Torrent Variant Caller plug-in software. After variant detection, their effects were analyzed using ANNOVAR software [20, 21]. The missense, nonsense, insertion/deletion and splicing variants were selected from the identified variants. Variants were further selected as less than 1% of 1) the 1,000 genome database [22], 2) the 6,500 exome variants [23], 3) the Human Genetic Variation Database (dataset for 1,208 Japanese exome variants) [24], and 4) the 333 in-house Japanese normal hearing controls. Direct sequencing was conducted to confirm the selected variants.

The pathogenicity of a variant was evaluated by ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics) standards and guidelines [25]. For missense variants, in particular, functional prediction software, including Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT) [26], Polymorphism Phenotyping (PolyPhen2) [27], LRT [28], Mutation Taster [29], Mutation Assessor [30], Functional Analysis through Hidden Markov Models (FATHMM) [31], RadialSVM, and LR [32], available on the wANNOVAR website were applied. Conservation of the mutation site was also evaluated in 13 species from the Homologene website [33]. Segregation analysis was performed for each proband and their family members.

Haplotype analysis

Haplotype analysis was performed to obtain insights into the origin of three mutations (p.A716T, p.K836T, and p.E864K) that were detected in multiple families. A set of 36 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the 1-Mbp region linked to the WFS1 locus (6271577–6304992; 17 sites upstream, 17 sites downstream, 2 sites in the WFS1 gene) was analyzed using direct DNA sequencing. The mutation-linked haplotype was determined by family member segregation analysis and compared among unrelated families with the same mutations. With respect to the p.K836T missense mutation, a large Japanese family with the identical mutation in our previous report [34] was included in the comparison.

Clinical evaluation

The onset age of HL as well as the presence of subjective progression in hearing, tinnitus, and vertigo/dizziness were analyzed based on the medical charts of the probands and their affected family members. Information on the incidence of diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy was also collected and evaluated.

Pure-tone audiometry or conditioned orientation response audiometry (COR) was performed to evaluate HL according to the tested age of each individual. The pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated from the audiometric thresholds at four frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz). The HL patients were divided into 4 groups based on severity; mild (PTA: 20–40 dB HL), moderate (41–70 dB HL), severe (71–95 dB HL), and profound (>95 dB HL). The audiometric configurations were classified into low-frequency, middle-frequency (U-shaped), high-frequency, low- and high-frequency and flat types as reported previously [18].

Results

Detected variants

MPS detected eight previously reported mutations and five novel, possibly pathogenic variants in WFS1 in 19 of the 2549 Japanese HL probands (Table 1). All heterozygous missense variants were identified within exon 8, and were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Three mutations (p.A684V, p.K836N, and p.E864K) were previously reported to cause Wolfram-like syndrome [5–7]. No candidate pathogenic variants in the other 68 deafness genes were detected in the 19 probands.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. WFS1 mutations found in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.t001

Pedigree and pure-tone audiograms for the 19 probands with WFS1 variants and their family members are shown in Fig 1. HL in 15 probands exhibited an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern or mitochondrial pattern, whereas HL in the other four probands was sporadic. Three previously reported mutations (p.A684V, p.D729N, and p.E795D) [7, 35, 36] were detected in the sporadic cases. Unfortunately, DNA samples could not be obtained from their parents. However de novo changes were thought to be the cause of HL in these sporadic cases. Among the five novel variants, four (p.L303P, p.S308C, p.N661S, and p.R676H) were identified in families with autosomal dominant HL, whereas the other (p.N682S) was detected in a sporadic case. The p.L303P, p.S308C, and p.R676H variants were confirmed to be segregated with HL. Only proband DNA samples were obtained for the remaining two variants (p.N661S, and p.N682S); however, their audiograms showed bilateral low-frequency sensorineural HL, which is the typical configuration in DFNA6/14/38 patients. All five possibly pathogenic variants were predicted to be pathological according to aforementioned prediction software programs (Table 1). All their corresponding amino acid residues are well conserved across vertebrates (Fig 2). Furthermore, these variants were not found in our 333 in-house controls (666 control alleles). Taken together, all five novel variants were considered likely pathogenic variants.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Pedigree and audiograms for each family with a WFS1 mutation.

Arrows show the probands in each family. Genetic findings for each individual tested are noted in the pedigree.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Evolutionary conservation of amino acid residues in the five novel variants.

All amino acid residues other than p.S308 are well conserved across vertebrates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.g002

Heterozygous WFS1 variants were detected in 15 (2.5%) of 602 families with autosomal dominant HL or mitochondrial HL and in four (0.7%) of 559 sporadic cases. No variants were detected in 1018 families with autosomal recessive HL, or 370 families with autosomal recessive or unknown family history. In addition, variants were identified in seven (18.4%) of 38 probands with autosomal dominant low-frequency hereditary HL, and in three (4.5%) of 67 probands with sporadic low-frequency sensorineural HL.

Clinical audiovestibular features

Table 2 summarizes the clinical characteristics for 30 affected members from 19 families with WFS1 mutations. [5–7, 34, 36–38]

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Clinical features of affected family members associated with WFS1 mutations found in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.t002

The onset age of HL varied widely from 0 to 30 years. Progression of hearing and tinnitus were noticed in 15 (55.5%) of 27 individuals and in 12 (42.9%) of 28 individuals, respectively, while vertigo and/or dizziness was present in seven (25.0%) of 28 individuals.

Pure-tone audiograms could not be obtained for two individuals. In the remaining 28 individuals, audiograms basically showed bilateral symmetrical sensorineural HL (Fig 1). Low-frequency type was the most prevalent audiometric configuration and was recognized in 14 individuals; however, some individuals exhibited flat, middle-frequency (U-shaped), and high-frequency audiograms. In addition, individual 12–1 had a flat audiogram for the left ear and a low-frequency audiogram for the right ear. Individual 16–2 had bilateral low- and high-frequency HL, but the age at audiometric testing was 79 years and the HL at the higher frequencies was thought to be affected by presbycusis.

Associated symptoms

Three mutations (p.A684V, p.K836N, and p.E864K) previously reported as responsible for Wolfram-like syndrome were detected in four families (Table 2). However, none were found to suffer from diabetes mellitus. Only two affected individuals within the same family individuals (18–1 and 18–2) carrying p.E864K mutation had optic atrophy.

Haplotype analysis

S2 Table, S3 Table and S4 Table show the haplotype patterns within the 1-Mbp region surrounding the position of the frequent mutations, p.A716T, p.K836T, and p.E864K, respectively. For the p.K836T mutation, in addition to the pedigrees identified in this study, we also analyzed the family with p.K836T reported by Fujikawa et al [34]. in 2010. The pedigree for this case is shown in S1 Fig. The findings suggested that the three mutations occurred on different haplotypes, indicating that the three mutations arose independently in each family and were considered to be mutational hot spots.

Discussion

In the present study, targeted MPS was carried out in a large series of HL patients, and eight previously reported mutations and additional five novel mutations in WFS1 were successfully identified in 19 unrelated families. The incidence of WFS1 variants was 2.5% (15/602) in the presumably autosomal dominant or mitochondrial HL families. This finding shows that WFS1 mutations are the fourth most frequent cause of autosomal dominant HL in Japan, followed by KCNQ4 mutations (6.6%) [39], TECTA mutations (2.9%) [40], and POU4F3 mutations (2.7%) [41]. The present study, which enrolled 38 probands with autosomal dominant low-frequency HL, showed a lower WFS1 mutation detection rate of approximately 20% compared to our previous study (33%) [17].

Mutations causing Wolfram syndrome are spread over the entire coding region in WFS1, and are typically inactivating, suggesting that a loss of function causes the disease phenotype [42]. By contrast, although three deletion mutations have been detected in DFNA6/14/38 families, the majority were found to be missense mutations (Table 3) [13–17, 34, 37, 43–56]. The mutations were concentrated in exon 8, and mainly involved amino acid positions in the C-terminal domain (amino acids 652–890). All 13 mutations identified in the present study were missense mutations, and were located in exon 8. Nine of 13 mutations involved amino acid positions in the C-terminal domain (amino acids 652–890).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Summary of clinical features associated with DFNA6/14/38 from previous studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.t003

In previous studies, the onset age of HL varied among individuals (Table 3). In the present study, some affected individuals had congenital HL, whereas others exhibited postlingual or late-onset HL, which supported the previous findings. Universal newborn hearing screening has facilitated the detection of congenital HL. However, automated auditory brainstem responses may fail to detect HL in newborns with low-frequency HL, which is the typical audiometric configuration of DFNA6/14/38, as the auditory brainstem response threshold basically reflects the audiometric thresholds at higher frequencies in pure-tone audiograms. Therefore, it is possible that some patients with WFS1 mutations had congenital HL, even if among patients diagnosed with late-onset HL. The presence of HL progression and/or tinnitus differed by individual, which was consistent with the findings of previous studies. In the present study, two affected individuals possessing Wolfram-like syndrome mutations showed profound HL, whereas the individuals with DFNA6/14/38 showed mild to severe HL. However, a few patients with DFNA6/14/38 were reported to have profound HL [15, 16], and the patients with the same WFS1 mutations had relatively similar HL.

Although middle-frequency and flat type audiometric configurations were reported in some patients with heterozygous WFS1 mutations [15, 16, 34], low-frequency type audiograms are typical among DFNA6/14/38 patients. One plausible explanation for these audiometric configuration findings is that WFS1 mutations were previously screened among patients with low-frequency sensorineural HL. The advantage of this study is that WFS1 mutations were screened in patients with various types of audiometric configurations. Consequently, although the most prevalent audiometric configuration was low-frequency type, some individuals showed a high-frequency type. Therefore, we should pay attention to the fact that heterozygous WFS1 mutations can cause high-frequency sensorineural or flat type HL.

Vertigo was reported in several affected members in a Chinese family with the p.H696Y mutation [16]. However, there have been no other studies reporting vertiginous symptoms in DFNA6/14/38 patients. Furthermore, studies on vestibular function, including caloric testing and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, showed normal function [7, 8, 52]. In this study, seven individuals suffered from vertigo/dizziness; however, none of them underwent vestibular function testing. Further studies are necessary to clarify the relationship between WFS1 mutations and balance disorders.

Three mutations identified in this study (p.A684V, p.K836N, and p.E864K) were previously reported to cause Wolfram-like syndrome [5–7]. The onset of HL in patients with Wolfram-like syndrome varies from 0 to 15 years of age, and pure-tone audiograms show moderate to profound, symmetric progressive sensorineural HL (Table 4) [5–7, 35, 36]. These patients showed low-frequency, flat, or middle-frequency audiometric configurations. The Wolfram-like syndrome phenotypes were almost identical to those of DFNA6/14/38. In addition, all reported patients had optic atrophy, whereas only some patients exhibited diabetes mellitus [5–7]. In this study, HL started from 0 to 30 years of age, and was moderate to profound in severity. Audiometric configurations included flat, low-frequency, and middle-frequency types. These findings were similar to those of previous studies on Wolfram-like syndrome. However, no individual suffered from diabetes mellitus, and only two individuals had optic atrophy. It is necessary to follow patients due to the possibility of late-onset diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy [5].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Summary of clinical features associated with Wolfram-like syndrome from previous studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.t004

Haplotype analysis of p.A716T, p.K836T, and p.E864K did not show the same haplotype among the families with the same mutation. In addition, p.A716T and p.E864K, which were detected in our Japanese population, have also been reported in the other ethnic populations. These findings suggested that the three mutations occurred in mutational hot spots. Interestingly, four variants in WFS1 were identified among our sporadic cases; however, three of the four variants (p.N682S, p.A684V, p.D729N, and p.E795D) have been previously reported in non-Asian populations. Therefore, these variants might occur as de novo changes at the mutational hot spots.

In summary, this MPS-based study successfully identified eight previously reported mutations and five novel variants, and estimated the incidence of WFS1 variants to be 2.5% in Japanese families with presumably autosomal dominant or mitochondrial HL. This exhaustive mutational study of a large series of HL patients provided valuable new insights, particularly with regard to the audiometric configurations and vestibular symptoms in DFNA6/14/38 or Wolfram-like syndrome patients. We found that some variants can occur as a de novo change at the mutational hot spots in WFS1, resulting in an audiovestibular phenotype.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Table. The 68 genes reported to cause hearing loss.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.s001

(PDF)

S2 Table. Haplotype patterns of two families with p.A716T.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.s002

(PDF)

S3 Table. Haplotype patterns of five families with p.K836T.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.s003

(PDF)

S4 Table. Haplotype patterns of two families with p.E864K.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.s004

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Pedigree of a proband with WFS1–associated hearing loss with a p.K836T mutation reported in Fuijkawa et al, 2010.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359.s005

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the probands and their family members who participated in this study.

This study was supported by a Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on rare and intractable diseases (H24-Nanchito(Nan)-Ippan-032) and Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare (H25-Kanakaku-Ippan-002) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (S.U.), by a Grant-in-Aid from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (S.U.) (16ek0109114h0002, 16kk0205010h001), and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (22249057) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (S.U.).

Citation: Kobayashi M, Miyagawa M, Nishio S-y, Moteki H, Fujikawa T, Ohyama K, et al. (2018) WFS1 mutation screening in a large series of Japanese hearing loss patients: Massively parallel DNA sequencing-based analysis. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0193359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193359

References

1. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening–a silent revolution. N Eng J Med. 2006;354: 2151–2164.

2. Hilgert N, Smith RJ, Van Camp G. Function and expression pattern of nonsyndromic deafness genes. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9: 546–564. pmid:19601806

3. The Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage; http://hereditaryhearingloss.org, accessed on March 15, 2017.

4. Bespalova IN, Van Camp G, Bom SJ, Brown DJ, Cryns K, DeWan AT, et al. Mutations in the Wolfram Syndrome 1 gene (WFS1) are a common cause of low frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10: 2501–2508. pmid:11709537

5. Eiberg H, Hansen L, Kjer B, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Bille M, et al. Autosomal dominant optic atrophy associated with hearing impairment and impaired glucose regulation caused by a missense mutation in the WFS1 gene. J Med Genet. 2006;43:435–440. pmid:16648378

6. Hogewind BF, Pennings RJ, Hol FA, Kunst HP, Hoefsloot EH, Cruysberg JR, et al. Autosomal dominant optic neuropathy and sensorineural hearing loss associated with a novel mutation of WFS1. Molec Vis. 2010;16: 26–35. pmid:20069065

7. Rendtorff ND, Lodahl M, Boulahbel H, Johansen IR, Pandya A, Welch KO, et al. Identification of p.A684V missense mutation in the WFS1 gene as a frequent cause of autosomal dominant optic atrophy and hearing impairment. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A: 1298–1313. pmid:21538838

8. Inoue H, Tanizawa Y, Wasson J, Behn P, Kalidas K, Bernal-Mizrachi E et al. A gene encoding a transmembrane protein is mutated in patients with diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy (Wolfram syndrome). Nat Genet. 1998;20: 143–148. pmid:9771706

9. Strom TM, Hörtnagel K, Hofmann S, Gekeler F, Scharfe C, Rabl W et al. Diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy and deafness (DIDMOAD) caused by mutations in a novel gene (wolframin) coding for a predicted transmembrane protein. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7: 2021–2028. pmid:9817917

10. Takeda K, Inoue H, Tanizawa Y, Matsuzaki Y, Oba J, Watanabe Y, et al. WFS1 (Wolfram syndrome 1) gene product: predominant subcellular localization to endoplasmic reticulum in cultured cells and neuronal expression in rat brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10: 477–484. pmid:11181571

11. Cryns K, Thys S, Van Laer L, Oka Y, Pfister M, Van Nassauw L, et al. The WFS1 gene, responsible for low frequency sensorineural hearing loss and Wolfram syndrome, is expressed a variety of inner ear cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2003;119: 247–256. pmid:12649740

12. Rigoli L, Lombardo F, Di Bella C. Wolfam syndrome and WFS1 gene. Clin Genet. 2011;79:103–117. pmid:20738327

13. Choi BY, Park G, Gim J, Kim AR, Kim BJ, Kim HS, et al. Diagnostic application of targeted resequencing for familial nonsyndromic hearing loss. PloS One. 2013;8: e68692. pmid:23990876

14. Wei Q, Zhu H, Qian X, Chen Z, Yao J, Lu Y, et al. Targeted genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing to identify novel variants causing Chinese hereditary hearing loss. J Transl Med. 2014;12:311. pmid:25388789

15. Bai X, Lv H, Zhang F, Liu J, Fan Z, Xu L, et al. Identification of a novel missesense mutation in the WFS1 gene as a cause of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss in all-frequencies. Am J Med Genet A.2014;164A: 3052–3060. pmid:25250959

16. Sun Y, Cheng J, Lu Y, Li J, Lu Y, Jin Z, et al. Identification of two novel missense WFS1 mutations, H696Y and R703H, in patients with nonsyndromic low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Genet Genomics. 2011;38: 71–76. pmid:21356526

17. Fukuoka H, Kanda Y, Ohta S, Usami S. Mutations in the WFS1 gene are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic low-frequency hearing loss in Japanese. J Hum Genet. 2007;52: 510–515. pmid:17492394

18. Mazzoli M, Van Camp G, Newton N, Giarbini N, Declau F, et al. Recommendations for the description of genetic and audiological data for families with nonsyndromic hereditary hearing impairment. The Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage; http://hereditaryhearingloss.org, accessed on March 15, 2017.

19. Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Ikeda T, Fukushima K, Usami S. Massively parallel DNA sequencing successfully identifies new causative mutations in deafness genes in patients with cochlear implantation and EAS. PLoS One. 2013;8: e75793. pmid:24130743

20. Chang X, Wang K. wANNOVAR; annotating genetic variants for personal genomes via the web. J Med Genet. 2012;49: 433–436. pmid:22717648

21. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional anno- tation of genetic variation from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acid Res. 2010;38: e164. pmid:20601685

22. 1000 Genomes Projects Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012; 491: 56–65. pmid:23128226

23. NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Exome Variant Server. http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/. Accessed February 10, 2015.

24. Narahara M, Higasa K, Nakamura S, Tabara Y, Kawaguchi T, Ishii M, et al. Large-scale East- Asian eQTL mapping reveals novel candidate genes for LD mapping and the genomic landscape of transcriptional effects of sequence variants. PLoS One. 2014;9: e100924. pmid:24956270

25. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence varuants: a joint consensus recommendation of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17: 405–424. pmid:25741868

26. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4: 1073–1081. pmid:19561590

27. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7: 248–249. pmid:20354512

28. Chun S, Fay JC. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Res. 2009;19: 1553–1561. pmid:19602639

29. Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. Mutation Taster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010; 7: 575–576. pmid:20676075

30. Reva B, Antipin Y, Sander C. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39: e118. pmid:21727090

31. Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GL, Edwards KJ, et al. Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat. 2013;34: 57–65. pmid:23033316

32. Cooper GM, Stone EA, Asimenos G; NISC Comparative sequencing program, Green ED, Batzoglou S, et al. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res. 2005;15: 901–913. pmid:15965027

33. NCBI Homologene. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/homologene. Accessed October 10, 2016.

34. Fujikawa T, Noguchi Y, Ito T, Takahashi M, Kitamura K. Additional heterozygous 2507A>C mutation of WFS1 in progressive hearing loss at lower frequencies. Laryngoscope. 2010;120: 166–171. pmid:19877185

35. Rohayem J, Ehlers C, Wiedemann B, Holl R, Oexle K, Kordonouri O, et al. Diabetes and neurodegeneration in Wolfram syndrome: a multicenter study of phenotype and genotype. Diabetes Care. 2011;34: 1503–1510. pmid:21602428

36. Domènech E, Gómez-Zaera M, Nunes V. WFS1 mutations in Spanish patients with diabetes mellitus and deafness. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10: 421–426. pmid:12107816

37. Liu YH, Ke XM, Xiao SF. Heterogenous mutations of Wolfarm syndrome I gene responsible for low frequency nonsyndromic hearing loss. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005;10: 764–768.

38. Mets RB, Emery SB, Lesperance MM, Mets MB. Congenital cataracts in two siblings with Wolfram syndrome. Ophthalmic Genet. 2010;31: 227–229. pmid:21067485

39. Naito T, Nishio SY, Iwasaki Y, Yano T, Kumakawa K, Abe S, et al. Comprehensive genetic screening of KCNQ4 in a large autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss cohort: Genotype-phenotype correlations and a founder mutation, PLoS One. 2013;8: e63231. pmid:23717403

40. Moteki H, Nishio SY, Hashimoto S, Takumi Y, Iwasaki S, Takeichi N, et al. TECTA mutations in Japanese with mid-frequency hearing loss affected by zona pellucida domain protein secretion. J Hum Genet. 2012;57: 587–592. pmid:22718023

41. Kitano T, Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Moteki H, Oda K, Ohyama K, et al. POU4F3 mutation screening in Japanese hearing loss patients: Massively parallel DNA sequencing-based analysis successfully identified 12 novel mutations in 15 families with autosomal dominant hearing loss. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0177636. pmid:28545070

42. Hofmann S, Philbrook C, Gerbitz KD, Bauer MF. Wolfram syndrome: structural and functional analyses of mutant and wild-type wolframin, the WFS1 gene product. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12: 2003–2012. pmid:12913071

43. Tranebjaerg L, Barrett T, Rendtorff ND. WFS1–related disorders, Pagon RA, Bird TC, Dolan CR, Stephens K, eds. Gene Reviews (internet). 2009:Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle: 24.

44. Gonçalves AC, Matos TD, Simões-Teixeira HR, Pimenta Machado M, Simão M, Dias OP, et al. WFS1 and non-syndromic low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: A novel mutation in a Portuguese case. Gene. 2014;538: 288–291. pmid:24462758

45. Cryns K, Sivakumaran TA, Van den Ouweland JM, Pennings RJ, Cremers CW, Flothmann K, et al. Mutational spectrum of the WFS1 gene in Wolfram syndrome, nonsyndromic hearing impairment, diabetes mellitus, and psychiatric disease. Hum Mutat. 2003;22: 275–287. pmid:12955714

46. Sloan-Heggen CM, Bierer AO, Shearer AE, Kolbe DL, Nishimura CJ, Frees KL, et al. Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss. Hum Genet. 2016;135:441–450. pmid:26969326

47. Sloan-Heggen CM, Babanejad M, Beheshtian M, Simpson AC, Booth KT, Ardalani F, et al. Characterizing the spectrum of autosomal recessive hereditary hearing loss in Iran. J Med Genet. 2015; 52: 823–829. pmid:26445815

48. Smith CJ, Crock PA, King BR, Meldrum CJ, Scott RJ. Phenotype-genotype correlations in a series of wolfram syndrome families. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: 2003–2009. pmid:15277431

49. Komatsu K, Nakamura N, Ghadami M, Matsumoto N, Kishino T, Ohta T, et al. Confirmation of genetic homogeneity of nonsyndromic low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss by linkage analysis and a DFNA6/14 mutation in a Japanese family. J Hum Genet. 2002;47: 395–399. pmid:12181639

50. Tsai HT, Wang YP, Chung SF, Lin HC, Ho GM, Shu MT. A novel mutation in the WFS1 gene identified in a Taiwanese family with low- frequency hearing impairment. BMC Med Genet. 2007;22: 8–26.

51. Sivakumaran TA, Lesperance MM. A PCR-RFLP assay for the A716T mutation in the WFS1 gene, a common cause of low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Genet Test. 2002;6: 229–231. pmid:12490066

52. Bramhall NF, Kallman JC, Verrall AM, Street VA. A novel WFS1 mutation in a family with dominant low frequency sensorineural hearing loss with normal VEMP and EcochG findings. BMC Med Genet. 2008;9: 48. pmid:18518985

53. Kunz J, Marquez-Klaka B, Uebe S, Volz-Peters A, Berger R, Rausch P. Identification of a novel mutation in WFS1 in a family affected by low-frequency hearing impairment. Mutat Res. 2003;525: 121–124. pmid:12650912

54. Gürtler N, Kim Y Mhatre A, Schlegel C, Mathis A, Daniels R, et al. Two families with nonsyndromic low-frequency hearing loss harbor novel mutations in Wolfram syndrome gene 1. J Mol Med (Berl). 2005;83: 553–560.

55. Noguchi Y Yashima T Hatanaka A, Uzawa M, Yasunami M, Kimura A, et al. A mutation in Wolfram syndrome type 1 gene in a Japanese family with autosomal dominant low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;11: 1189–1194.

56. Hilderbrand MS, Sorensen JL, Jensen M, Kimberling WJ, Smith RJ. Autoimmune disease in a DFNA6/14/38 family carrying a novel missense mutation in WFS1. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A: 2258–2265. pmid:18688868