The Sensitivity of Numerical Simulations of Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers to Cross-Grid Flow

Abstract

In mesoscale and global atmospheric simulations with large horizontal domains, strong horizontal flow across the grid is often unavoidable, but its effects on cloud-topped boundary layers have received comparatively little study. Here the effects of cross-grid flow on large-eddy simulations of stratocumulus and trade-cumulus marine boundary layers are studied across a range of grid resolutions (horizontal × vertical) between 500 m × 20 m and 35 m × 5 m. Three cases are simulated: DYCOMS nocturnal stratocumulus, BOMEX trade cumulus, and a GCSS stratocumulus-to-trade cumulus case. Simulations are performed with a stationary grid (with 4–8 m s⁻¹ horizontal winds blowing through the cyclic domain) and a moving grid (equivalent to subtracting off a fixed vertically uniform horizontal wind) approximately matching the mean boundary-layer wind speed. For stratocumulus clouds, cross-grid flow produces two primary effects on stratocumulus clouds: a filtering of fine-scale resolved turbulent eddies, which reduces stratocumulus cloud-top entrainment, and a vertical broadening of the stratocumulus-top inversion which enhances cloud-top entrainment. With a coarse (20 m) vertical grid, the former effect dominates and leads to strong increases in cloud cover and LWP, especially as horizontal resolution is coarsened. With a finer (5 m) vertical grid, the latter effect is stronger and leads to small reductions in cloud cover and LWP. For the BOMEX trade cumulus case, cross-grid flow tends to produce fewer and larger clouds with higher LWP, especially for coarser vertical grid spacing. The results presented are robust to choice of scalar advection scheme and Courant number.

References Arakawa, A., & Wu, C.-M. (2013). A unified representation of deep moist convection in numerical modeling of the atmosphere. Part I. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 70, 1977–1991. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0330.1 Blossey, P. N., & Durran, D. R. (2008). Selective monotonicity preservation in scalar advection. Journal of Computational Physics, 127, 5160–5183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.043 Bretherton, C. S., & Wyant, M. C. (1997). Moisture transport, lower-tropospheric stability, and decoupling of cloud-topped boundary layers. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 54, 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0148:MTLTSA>2.0.CO;2 Cheng, A., Xu, K.-M., & Stevens, B. (2010). Effects of resolution on the simulation of boundary -layer clouds and the partition of kinetic energy to sub-grid scales. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.3 de Roode, S. R., Sandu, I., van der Dussen, J. J., Ackerman, A. S., Blossey, P., Jarecka, D., et al. (2016). Large-eddy simulations of EUCLIPSE-GASS Lagrangian stratocumulus-to-cumulus transitions: Mean state, turbulence, and decoupling. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73, 2485–2508. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0215.1 Iacono, M., Delamere, J., Mlawer, E., Shephard, M., & Clough, S. (2008). Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D13103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944 Khairoutdinov, M., & Kogan, Y. (2000). A new cloud physics parameterization in a large-eddy simulation of marine stratocumulus. Monthly Weather Review, 128, 229–243. Khairoutdinov, M. F., & Randall, D. A. (2003). Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 60(4), 607–625. Khairoutdinov, M., Randall, D., & DeMott, C. (2005). Simulations of the atmospheric general circulation using a cloud-resolving model as a superparameterization of physical processes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62, 2136–2154. Lele, S. K. (1992). Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics, 103, 16–42. Matheou, G., Chung, D., Nuijens, L., & Stevens, B. (2011). On the fidelity of large-eddy simulation of shallow precipitation cumulus convection. Monthly Weather Review, 139, 2918–2939. McGibbon, J., & Bretherton, C. S. (2017). Skill of ship-following large-eddy simulations in reproducing MAGIC observations across the Northeast Pacific stratocumulus to cumulus transition region. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9, 810–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000924 Miyamoto, Y., Kajikawa, Y., Yoshida, R., Yamaura, T., Yashiro, H., & Tomita, H. (2013). Deep moist atmospheric convection in a subkilometer global simulation. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 4922–4926. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50944 Mlawer, E., Taubman, S., Brown, P., Iacono, M., & Clough, S. (1997). RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 16663–16682. Parishani, H., Pritchard, M. S., Bretherton, C. S., Wyant, M. C., & Khairoutdinov, M. (2017). Towards low cloud-permitting cloud superparameterization with explicit boundary layer turbulence. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9, 1542–1571. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000968 Pedersen, J. G., Malinowski, S. P., & Grabowski, W. W. (2016). Resolution and domain-size sensitivity in implicit large-eddy simulation of the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 8, 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000572 Pressel, K. G., Mishra, S., Schneider, T., Kaul, C. M., & Tan, Z. (2017). Numerics and subgrid-scale modeling in large eddy simulations of stratocumulus clouds. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9, 1342–1365. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000778 Sandu, I., & Stevens, B. (2011). On the factors modulating the stratocumulus to cumulus transitions. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 68, 1865–1881. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3614.1 Siebesma, A., Bretherton, C. S., Brown, A., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J., Duynkerke, P. G., et al.. (2003). A large eddy simulation intercomparision study of shallow cumulus convection. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 60(10), 1201–1219. Smolarkeiwicz, P., & Szmelter, J. (2009). Iterated upwind schemes for gas dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 228, 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.08.008 Stevens, B. (2002). Entrainment in stratocumulus-topped mixed layers. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 128(586), 2663–2690. p Stevens, B., Moeng, C.-H., Ackerman, A. S., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., de Roode, S., et al. (2005). Evaluation of large-eddy simulations via observations of nocturnal marine stratocumulus. Monthly Weather Review, 133, 1443–1462. Wyngaard, J. C. (2004). Toward numerical modeling in the Terra Incognita. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 61, 1816–1826. Yamaguchi, T., & Randall, D. A. (2012). Cooling of entrained parcels in a large-eddy simulation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 69, 1118–1136. Yamaguchi, T., Randall, D. A., & Khairoutdinov, M. F. (2011). Cloud modeling tests of the ULTIMATE-MACHO scalar advection scheme. Monthly Weather Review, 139, 3248–3264.