It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Catalytic transformation of CH4 under a mild condition is significant for efficient utilization of shale gas under the circumstance of switching raw materials of chemical industries to shale gas. Here, we report the transformation of CH4 to acetic acid and methanol through coupling of CH4, CO and O2 on single-site Rh1O5 anchored in microporous aluminosilicates in solution at ≤150 °C. The activity of these singly dispersed precious metal sites for production of organic oxygenates can reach about 0.10 acetic acid molecules on a Rh1O5 site per second at 150 °C with a selectivity of ~70% for production of acetic acid. It is higher than the activity of free Rh cations by >1000 times. Computational studies suggest that the first C–H bond of CH4 is activated by Rh1O5 anchored on the wall of micropores of ZSM-5; the formed CH3 then couples with CO and OH, to produce acetic acid over a low activation barrier.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering and Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
3 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering and Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
4 Innovation Research Center for Fuel Cells and Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo, Japan
5 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering and Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment and College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
6 Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; Division of Chemistry, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA