It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
About 70 genetic studies have already addressed the need of biomarkers to predict the response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to methotrexate (MTX) treatment. However, no genetic biomarker has yet been sufficiently validated. Here, we aimed to replicate a selection of 25 SNPs in the largest collection of patients up to date, which consisted of 915 patients treated with MTX. The change in disease activity (measured as ΔDAS28) from baseline was considered the primary outcome. In addition, response according to widely used criteria (EULAR) was taken as secondary outcome. We considered consistency between outcomes, P values accounting for the number of SNPs, and independence from potential confounders for interpretation of the results. Only the rs1801394 SNP in MTRR fulfilled the high association standards. Its minor allele was associated with less improvement than the major allele according to ΔDAS28 (p = 0.0016), and EULAR response (p = 0.004), with independence of sex, age, baseline DAS28, smoking, seropositivity, concomitant corticosteroid use or previous treatments. In addition, previous evidence suggests the association of this SNP with response to MTX in another autoimmune disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and with high intracellular folate levels, which could contribute to poor response.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Experimental and Observational Rheumatology and Rheumatology Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria - Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Travesia Choupana sn, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2 CESPU, Institute of Research & Advanced Training in Health Sciences & Technologies, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gandra, PRD, Portugal
3 Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal; Rheumatology Department of São João Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
4 Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
5 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Spartańska 1, Warsaw, Poland
6 Department of Rheumatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
7 Department of Genetics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
8 Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
9 Rheumatology Department, Instituto de Investigacion del Hospital de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain
10 Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, Barcelona, Spain
11 Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain