Content area

Abstract

The Suchey-Brooks method is commonly used for pubic symphyseal aging in forensic cases. However, inter-population variability is a problem affected by several factors such as geographical location and secular trends. The aim of our study was to test the reliability of the Suchey-Brooks method on a virtual sample of contemporary French males.

We carried out a retrospective study of 680 pubic symphysis from adult males undergoing clinical Multislice Computed Tomography in two hospitals between January 2013 and July 2014 (Toulouse and Tours, France). The reliability of the Suchey-Brooks method was tested by the calculation of inaccuracy and bias between real and estimated ages, and the mean age for each stage and the mean stage for each 10-years age interval were compared.

The degree of inaccuracy and bias increased with age and inaccuracy exceeded 20 years for individuals over 65 years of age. The results are consistent with an overestimation of the real age for stages I and II and an underestimation of the real age for stages IV, V and VI. Furthermore, the mean stages of the reference sample were significantly lower for the 14–25 age group and significantly higher for individuals over 35 years old.

Age estimation is potentially limited by differential inter-population error rates between geographical locations. Furthermore, the effects of secular trends are also supported by research in European countries showing a reduction in the age of attainment of indicators of biological maturity during the past few decades. The results suggest that the Suchey-Brooks method should be used with caution in France. Our study supports previous findings and in the future, the Suchey-Brooks method could benefit from re-evaluation of the aging standards by the establishment of new virtual reference samples.

Details

Title
Reliability of the Suchey-Brooks method for a French contemporary population
Author
Savall, Frédéric 1 ; Rérolle, Camille 2 ; Hérin, Fabrice 3 ; Dédouit, Fabrice 4 ; Rougé, Daniel 1 ; Telmon, Norbert 1 ; Saint-Martin, Pauline 2 

 Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie AMIS, UMR 5288 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de Médecine Légale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France 
 Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie AMIS, UMR 5288 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de Médecine Légale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France 
 UMR 1027, Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique, Faculté de médecine, 37 allées J. Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France 
 Laboratoire d’Anthropobiologie AMIS, UMR 5288 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France; Service de Médecine Légale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; Service de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France 
Pages
586.e1-586.e5
Section
Forensic Anthropology Population Data
Publication year
2016
Publication date
Sep 2016
Publisher
Elsevier Limited
e-ISSN
18726283
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2051529630
Copyright
Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 2016