It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) signals recorded during simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are contaminated by strong artifacts. Among these, the ballistocardiographic (BCG) artifact is the most challenging, due to its complex spatio-temporal dynamics associated with ongoing cardiac activity. The presence of BCG residuals in EEG data may hide true, or generate spurious correlations between EEG and fMRI time-courses. Here, we propose an adaptive Optimal Basis Set (aOBS) method for BCG artifact removal. Our method is adaptive, as it can estimate the delay between cardiac activity and BCG occurrence on a beat-to-beat basis. The effective creation of an optimal basis set by principal component analysis (PCA) is therefore ensured by a more accurate alignment of BCG occurrences. Furthermore, aOBS can automatically estimate which components produced by PCA are likely to be BCG artifact-related and therefore need to be removed. The aOBS performance was evaluated on high-density EEG data acquired with simultaneous fMRI in healthy subjects during visual stimulation. As aOBS enables effective reduction of BCG residuals while preserving brain signals, we suggest it may find wide application in simultaneous EEG-fMRI studies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Research Center for Motor Control and Neuroplasticity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Neural Control of Movement Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Research Center for Motor Control and Neuroplasticity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Neural Control of Movement Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3 National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
4 Research Center for Motor Control and Neuroplasticity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; LET’S-ISTC, National Research Council, Rome, Italy; Birmingham University Imaging Centre (BUIC), School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
5 National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic; Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
6 Research Center for Motor Control and Neuroplasticity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital Foundation, Venice Lido, Italy