It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Flooding is one of the major constraints for rice production in rainfed lowlands, especially in years and areas of high rainfall. Incorporating the Sub1 (Submergence1) gene into high yielding popular varieties has proven to be the most feasible approach to sustain rice production in submergence-prone areas. Introgression of this QTL into popular varieties has resulted in considerable improvement in yield after flooding. However, its impact under non-flooded conditions or years have not been thoroughly evaluated which is important for the farmers to accept and adopt any new version of their popular varieties. The present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of Sub1 on grain yield of rice in different genetic backgrounds, under non-submergence conditions, over years and locations. The study was carried out using head to head trials in farmer’s fields, which enable the farmers to more accurately compare the performance of Sub1 varieties with their recurrent parents under own management. The data generated from different head to head trials revealed that the grain yield of Sub1 varieties was either statistically similar or higher than their non-Sub1 counterparts under non-submergence conditions. Thus, Sub1 rice varieties show no instance of yield penalty of the introgressed gene.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 International Rice Research Institute (IRRI-India), NASC Complex, New Delhi, India
2 Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir (J&K), Kashmir, India
3 Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
4 Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India
5 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
6 Center for Strategic Studies, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
7 Regional Agricultural Research Station, NARC, Tarahara, Nepal
8 Regional Agriculture Research Station, NARC, Bara, Nepal
9 Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
10 Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh
11 Association for Integrated Development (AID), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
12 Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India
13 Centre for Research and Development (CRD), Gorakhpur, UP, India
14 International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines




