Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- The Dark Factor of Personality
- Preliminary Empirical Support for a Common Core of Dark Traits
- Theoretical Notions on the Common Core of Dark Traits
- Limitations of Previous Research on the Common Core of Dark Traits
- The Present Investigation
- A Broader Set of Dark Traits
- Modeling the Common Core: A Bifactor Approach
- Study 1
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Measures
- Analyses
- Results and Discussion
- Study 2
- Method
- Participants
- Measures and procedure
- Results and Discussion
- Study 3
- Method
- Participants
- Measures
- Aggression
- Dominance
- Impulsivity
- Insensitivity
- Internalized Moral Identity
- Nurturance
- Perspective Taking
- Power
- Self-Centeredness
- Results and Discussion
- Testing for acquiescence
- Behavioral criterion measures
- Self-report criterion measures
- Locating D in basic personality space
- Study 4
- Method
- Results and Discussion
- General Discussion
- The Common Core of Dark Traits: The Dark Factor of Personality
- D in Relation to Basic Personality Traits
- The Fluid Nature of D and Implications for Its Measurement
- The Unique Role of Dark Traits Beyond D
- Conclusion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed “dark traits”) have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality (D). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one’s individual utility—disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others—accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies (N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical...





