Evaluation of costimulatory molecules in dogs with B cell high grade lymphoma

Abstract

B cell high grade lymphoma is the most common hematopoietic malignancy in dogs. Although the immune checkpoint molecules, programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been evaluated for the treatment of various human lymphoid malignancies, the expression of those molecules and their relationship with prognosis remain unknown in canine lymphoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expression of costimulatory molecules on peripheral blood lymphocytes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, in addition to associated ligand expression in the lymph nodes of patients with B cell multicentric high grade lymphoma. Eighteen patients diagnosed with B cell high grade lymphoma and nine healthy control dogs were enrolled. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the expression of PD-1 on CD4+ peripheral and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and CTLA-4 on CD4+ peripheral lymphocytes was significantly higher in the lymphoma group than in the control group. The expression level of CD80 mRNA was significantly lower in the lymphoma group than in the control group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD86 expression between the groups. Dogs with CTLA-4 levels below the cutoff values, which were determined based on receiver operating characteristic curves, on peripheral CD4+, CD8+, and tumor infiltrating CD4+ lymphocytes had significantly longer survival than dogs with values above the cutoff. Although it is uncertain whether the expression of immune checkpoint molecules affect the biological behavior of canine lymphoma, one possible explanation is that PD-1 and CTLA-4 might be associated with the suppression of antitumor immunity in dogs with B cell high grade lymphoma, particularly through CD4+ T cells.

About the Authors:

Michihito Tagawa

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Veterinary Medical Center, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1645-4413

Chihiro Kurashima

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: Veterinary Medical Center, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Satoshi Takagi

Roles Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Naoya Maekawa

Roles Methodology, Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Satoru Konnai

Roles Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Genya Shimbo

Roles Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Veterinary Medical Center, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Kotaro Matsumoto

Roles Methodology, Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Hisashi Inokuma

Roles Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Keiko Kawamoto

Roles Methodology, Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Research Center for Global Agromedicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Kazuro Miyahara

Roles Supervision, Validation

Affiliation: Veterinary Medical Center, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Introduction

Lymphoma is one of the most frequently occurring malignant neoplasms in dogs, and accounts for approximately 7–24% of all canine neoplasms and 83% of all hematopoietic malignancies [1]. The multicentric form of B cell lymphoma is most common, with a high percentage of cases involving the lymphoreticular system, which includes the lymph nodes, liver, spleen, and bone marrow [2]. Various combination chemotherapies have been reported to induce remission in approximately 80–95% of dogs; however, the majority of dogs will relapse within one year of starting treatment and overall median survival times are limited to 10–12 months [1, 3]. Specifically, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of the canine multicentric form of B cell lymphoma, and its relevance as a spontaneous model for human DLBCL has been confirmed by molecular and morphological approaches [4].

T cell functions are regulated by several immune checkpoint molecules [5]. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is an immune checkpoint molecule that is expressed on both activated and exhausted T cells. PD-1 has two ligands, namely PD-L1 (B7-H1) and PD-L2 (B7-DC). PD-L1 is widely expressed on non-hematopoietic cells including tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells, whereas PD-L2 expression is restricted to B cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells [6]. The interactions between PD-1 and PD-Ls provide a negative stimulus for antigen-induced T cell activation [7]. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), which is expressed on the surface of activated T lymphocytes, is another immune checkpoint molecule that transmits signals to inhibit T cell activation, through binding to the its ligands, CD80/86, which are expressed on antigen-presenting cells [8]. These immune checkpoint molecules including PD-1 and CTLA-4 are highly expressed on tumor infiltrating and peripheral lymphocytes, and their ligands are up-regulated in many human cancers [9, 10]. Immune checkpoint molecules are believed to represent an important mechanism through which tumor cells evade the host immune system, and evidence of immune dysregulation has been reported in several human cancers [9, 10, 11]. Several reports have demonstrated that the expression of these molecules is significantly correlated with a worse prognosis [10, 11]. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have shown promising effects for several human malignancies [12]. In veterinary medicine, previous studies have revealed that these immune checkpoint molecules including PD-1 and CTLA-4 are also highly expressed, with PD-L1 being up-regulated, in several cancers [13, 14, 15, 16].

Recently, several reports have examined the expression of immune checkpoint molecules on peripheral blood and/or tumor-infiltrating T cells in hematological malignancies, and its correlation with prognosis has been discussed [17, 18, 19]. In addition, those inhibitors have also been evaluated for the treatment of various lymphoid malignancies [17]. PD-1 is expressed by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in several types of lymphoma [18] and PD-Ls are also expressed on lymphoid tumor cells and nonmalignant tumor infiltrating cells, primarily macrophages [19, 20]. In addition, it was demonstrated that PD-L1 expression on tumor cells is correlated with a poor prognosis in B cell malignancies [19]. Several clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors have been conducted, and these have shown remarkable efficacy for some refractory hematologic malignancies [17]. Recently, canine multicentric high grade lymphoma has been shown to harbor many similarities to human non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and thus it is considered to be an attractive model for human studies [4, 21]. Therefore, these immune checkpoint molecules might represent new therapeutic targets for the treatment of canine lymphoma. However, there are only a few reports regarding immune checkpoint molecules in dogs with lymphoma, and their association with the disease is relatively unknown [13, 14]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of costimulatory molecules on peripheral blood lymphocytes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, as well as the expression of their ligands on tumor cells, from patients with B cell multicentric high grade lymphoma to assess immune status in these dogs.

Materials and methods

Study population

Eighteen dogs with B cell multicentric high grade lymphoma (lymphoma group) and nine clinically healthy controls (control group) were enrolled in this prospective study. For patients in the lymphoma group, lymphoma was cytologically or histologically confirmed in a veterinary medical center at Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine between October 2015 and August 2017. Staging of lymphoma was performed according to the WHO staging system [22] including thoracic radiography based on three views, abdominal ultrasound, and hematological examinations. Substage ‘a’ was defined as no clinical signs and substage ‘b’ was defined as systemic signs related to lymphoma including mild-to-moderate severity of gastrointestinal disorders or weight loss. The immunophenotype was determined by PCR antigen receptor rearrangement using fine needle aspirate (FNA) samples. All dogs received no prior chemotherapy treatment except for one relapsed case. Dogs in the control group were age-matched healthy patients who came to the hospital for medical examinations. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (Permission number: 27–143, 28–7, and 29–3).

Cell preparation

Heparinized peripheral blood was obtained from all patients and healthy controls. All heparinized blood samples were diluted with an equal volume of 0.9% saline, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated by Ficoll-Paque (Lymphoprep; Axis-Shield PoC AS, Oslo, Norway) density gradient centrifugation [23]. Following centrifugation at 800 × g for 20 min at room temperature, PBMCs were collected and washed twice with 0.9% saline. FNA samples were taken from palpable lymph nodes, and lymph nodes cells (LNCs) were suspended in 500 μl of saline. LNCs were centrifuged for 15 min at 1,500 rpm, and the supernatant was discarded. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml of VersaLyse (Beckman Coulter, Marseille Cedex, France) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. Following centrifugation, LNCs were washed and resuspended in 0.9% saline.

Flow cytometric analysis

For flow cytometric analysis, cells were pelleted by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,500 rpm and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% normal goat serum. Between 0.5 × 106 and 1 × 106 cells were stained using CD4, CD8, PD-1, and CTLA-4 antibodies for 30 min at 37 °C, as previously described [23]. The following antibody conjugates were used: rat anti-canine CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb): YKIX302.9 prelabeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate; rat anti-canine CD8 mAb: YCATE55.9 prelabeled with r-phycoerythrin (dilution rate 100:2.5, AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA); mouse anti-human CTLA-4 mAb: ANC152.2 (final concentration: 0.001 mg/ml, Ancell Corporation, Bayport, MN, USA) [16]; goat anti-human PD-1 polyclonal antibody (pAb): BAF1086 (0.005 mg/ml, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) [15, 24, 25]. Additionally, dye/isotype-matched antibodies were included in all experiments as controls. The cells were immediately analyzed (percentage and mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) using BD FACS Cant and FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Lymphocytes were first gated through forward and side scatter and then PD-1 and CTLA-4 expression was analyzed in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes populations. A minimum of 10,000 cells were analyzed for each sample. Detection limits were set based on the isotype controls such that less than 1% of cells were positive. (S1 Fig).

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was isolated from LNCs using TRIzol® Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After the isolation of total RNA, genomic DNA contamination was removed from the isolated RNA using recombinant DNase I (TURBO DNA-free™ Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. The RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop Lite (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), and the purity of the extracted RNA was in the range of 1.8–2.0, as determined by absorbance ratios of A260/A280. The purified RNA was eluted in nuclease-free water and stored at −80 °C until further use.

cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix containing Oligo dT primers and random primers (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Quantification of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 mRNA by real-time RT-PCR

RT-PCR amplification was performed to measure the levels of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 mRNA. Primers used for quantitative PCR were designed using Primer3Plus (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi/) based on canine GenBank sequences or previous reports (Table 1). All primer sets were designed to specifically amplify a region encompassing two exons of each gene. The NormFinder algorithm (https://www.moma.dk/normfinder-software) was used to identify the most stable gene among three candidate reference genes (ACTB, RPL13A, and RPL32) [26], and RPL13A was chosen as the reference gene. PCR products were subjected to Hokkaido System Science (Sapporo, Japan), and the specificities of these primers were confirmed by sequencing analysis. Nucleotide sequence results were confirmed using the BLAST search program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi) for comparison of other known sequences. Each real-time RT-PCR reaction was performed in a 20-μl total volume, containing 200 nM of each primer, 1 μl of cDNA, and GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), using a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, South San Francisco, CA, USA). Initial incubation at 95 °C for 2 min was followed by 40 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 sec and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 30 sec. A melt curve (60–95 °C) was generated at the end of each run to verify specificity. Amplification efficiency for each reaction was tested by the series dilution method. Absolute quantification of each mRNA was performed by converting sample cycle threshold values to a concentration (copies/μl), based on standard curves, which were generated using 10-fold serial dilutions (107–103 copies/μl) of each gene amplicon. The target amount was then divided by RPL13A levels to obtain a normalized target value. All samples were evaluated in triplicate.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Primer sequences for canine PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, CD86, ACTB, RPL13A, and RPL32 genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.t001

Statistical analysis

Sexes within each group were compared using the chi-squared test. Continuous variables such as age and PD-1 and CTLA-4 parameters were analyzed by performing Mann-Whitney U tests. Survival time was measured as the interval between the sampling day, usually the start of treatment, and death due to lymphoma. Dogs alive at the end of the study were censored for survival analysis. The survival curves were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method, which were compared using the log-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff values of continuous variables used for the prediction of a survival time exceeding a median value. A minimum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7 was required for the ROC model to be considered. X2 Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate categorical values. All analyses were performed using JMP 13 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant if the P value was less than 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

In the lymphoma group, the median age at sampling was 9.5 years (range, 3–14 years). Eleven dogs were male (five were castrated) and seven dogs were female (five were spayed). In the control group, the median age at sampling was 8.5 years (range, 1–12 years). Three dogs were male (one was castrated) and six dogs were female. There were no significant differences in terms of age or sex between the two groups. According to WHO staging, one dog was classified as stage II, five as III, six as IV, and six as V. Eleven dogs were classified as substage a and seven as b. Only two dogs were treated with prednisolone before sampling. Ten dogs were treated with a CHOP-based protocol and five dogs with prednisolone alone. The others were treated with L-asparaginase (as outlined in Table 2). Euthanasia was performed only for one dog, which was in extremis, and all other cases died naturally. The overall median survival time was 121 days (range, 1–340 days). Two dogs were still alive at the end of the study, representing survival of 191 and 208 days.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Clinical parameters of 18 dogs diagnosed with B cell lymphoma.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.t002

PD-1 and CTLA-4 expression on T cells from PBMCs and LNCs

PBMCs were available from all dogs, and LNCs were available from 17 of 18 dogs with lymphoma and from all nine control dogs. The proportion of PD-1- and CTLA-4-expressing cells was calculated as the percentage of PD-1+ or CTLA-4+ cells in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subtypes for each group. The proportions of PD-1+ cells in CD4+ lymphocyte populations obtained from PBMCs and LNCs were significantly higher in the lymphoma group (PBMCs, mean ± standard deviation: 46.67% ± 18.52%; LNCs, 61.29% ± 16.99%) than in the control group (PBMCs, 30.79% ± 7.18%, P = 0.011, Fig 1A; LNCs, 29.48% ± 7.90%, P < 0.001, Fig 1C). Regarding, PD-1 expression in CD8+ lymphocytes obtained from PBMCs and LNCs, there were no significant differences between the groups (Fig 1B and 1D). The proportion of CTLA-4+ cells in CD4+ lymphocyte populations obtained from PBMCs was significantly higher in the lymphoma group (1.40% ± 0.92%) than in the control group (0.62% ± 0.26%, P = 0.018, Fig 1E). Regarding CTLA-4 expression in CD8+ lymphocytes obtained from PBMCs and CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes obtained from LNCs, there were no significant differences between the groups (Fig 1F, 1G and 1H). MFIs of PD-1 on the surface of CD4+ lymphocytes obtained from PBMCs and LNCs were significantly higher in the lymphoma group (PBMCs, 1169 ± 573, P = 0.004; LNCs, 2655 ± 1116, P < 0.001) than in the control group (PBMCs, 617 ± 262; LNCs, 933 ± 375; S2 Fig).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Proportion of PD-1+ and CTLA-4+ cells in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte populations from dogs with B cell lymphoma and control animals.

Results were obtained by performing flow cytometry. Each dot represents a patient and the bar represents the median. P values are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.g001

PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 mRNA expression levels in LNCs

Based on sequence analysis, PCR products of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, CD86, ACTB, RPL13A, and RPL32 were shown to have 100% identity with each reference gene. By analyzing the linearity of amplification for successively diluted cDNA, the efficiency for all the reactions was determined. The slopes ranged from −3.37 to −3.84, the R2 values ranged from 0.96 to 0.99, and the efficiencies ranged from 82.1% to 98.0%. The expression levels of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 mRNA in LNCs were evaluated by real-time PCR. RNA samples were available from 17 of 18 dogs with lymphoma and for all nine control dogs. The PD-L1 transcript was expressed in all dogs, whereas PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 were detected in 25 of 26 dogs. The expression level of CD80 was significantly lower in the lymphoma group than in the control group (P = 0.004, Fig 2C). In contrast, there were no significant differences in terms of PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD86 expression between the groups (Fig 2A, 2B and 2D).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Relative quantity of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 transcript levels in lymph node cells from dogs with B cell lymphoma and control animals.

Expression of each target mRNA was obtained by real-time PCR, normalizing to the target gene RPL13A. Each dot represents a patient and the bar represents the median. P value is shown. ND, not detected.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.g002

Relationship between expression of immune checkpoints and survival time

Optimal cutoff values were determined based on each ROC curve (Table 3). Regarding CTLA-4 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, dogs with levels below the cutoff value had significantly longer survival time than the dogs with values above the cutoff (CD4+ CTLA-4+ in PBMCs, median survival times below and above the cutoff = 138 days and 11 days, respectively, P < 0.001, Fig 3A; CD8+ CTLA-4+ in PBMCs, 138.5 days and 15.5 days, respectively, P = 0.002, Fig 3B; CD4+ CTLA-4+ in LNCs, 138 days and 16.5 days, respectively, P = 0.026, Fig 3C). In addition, for CTLA-4+ cells in CD8+ populations and PD-1+ cells in CD4+ lymphocytes obtained from LNCs, dogs with levels below the cutoff value had significantly longer survival time than dogs with values above the cutoff (CD8+ CTLA-4+ in LNCs, 121 days and 44 days, respectively, P = 0.048; CD4+ PD-1+ in LNCs, 127.5 days and 13 days, respectively, P = 0.023); however, their AUC values were below 0.7 (data not shown). Except for CD4+ PD-1+ in LNCs, the expressions of PD-1+ on lymphocytes did not correlate with survival time. Regarding mRNA expression, no correlation was found with survival time (data not shown). The clinical features and treatment modality for dogs with each parameter level below or above the cutoff values are summarized in S1 Table. Higher proportions of CD4+ PD-1+ (P = 0.047), CD4+ CTLA-4+ (P = 0.003), and CD8+ CTLA-4+ (P = 0.013) cells in PBMCs were significantly correlated with substage b.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Cutoff and area under the curve (AUC) values obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each parameter.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.t003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival time in dogs with B cell lymphoma according to each cutoff value based on CTLA-4 expression.

Expression of each marker was determined in CD4+ and CD8+ cell populations. Cutoff and P values are shown. + censored case.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.g003

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the expression of immune checkpoint molecules including PD-1 and CTLA-4 and their ligands in canine lymphoma patients. In these lymphoma samples, significantly higher expression of CTLA-4 was observed on CD4+ lymphocytes obtained from PBMCs. In addition, the expression of PD-1 on CD4+ lymphocytes obtained from PBMCs and LNCs was also significantly higher in the lymphoma group. CTLA-4, a costimulatory receptor expressed on the surface of activated T cells, is a negative regulator of T cell activation. PD-1 is also an immunoinhibitory receptor expressed by chronically stimulated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after T cell activation [8, 9]. Up-regulation of the expression of checkpoint regulators plays an important role in the evasion of immune surveillance by malignant cells [17]. In humans, PD-1 expression has been evaluated in different lymphoma types including B cell lymphoma [27, 28, 29, 30]. CTLA-4 is highly expressed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in lymphoid malignancies [31, 32]. There have also been some reports on the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in dogs with different malignancies [13, 14, 33]. Recently, high expression of PD-1 on tumor infiltrating T cells was reported in dogs with B and T cell lymphoma [34]. In this study, significantly higher expression of PD-1 was observed on CD4+ T cells obtained from LNCs from dogs with lymphoma, and CD8+ T cells tended to up-regulate these molecules. In addition, PD-1 expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells obtained from dogs with lymphoma was significantly higher compared to that in control animals. In veterinary medicine, although previous studies revealed high expression of CTLA-4 in dogs with oligodendroglioma and histiocytic sarcoma [15, 16], the expression of this marker in lymphoma had not previously been reported. We found that CTLA-4 expression on CD4+ T cells obtained from PBMCs was significantly higher in the lymphoma group than in the control group. Lymphocytes including T and B cells are the major cells of the adaptive immune system. CD8+ T cells destroy virus-infected cells and tumor cells. CD4+ T lymphocytes have no cytotoxic or phagocytic activity and cannot kill infected cells or clear pathogens; however, they do manage the immune response by directing other cells to perform these tasks [35]. This study suggested that PD-1 and CTLA-4 might be associated with the suppression of antitumor immunity in dogs with B cell lymphoma, and particularly through CD4+ T cells.

To further evaluate the immune checkpoint pathway, mRNA expression levels of PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 were measured in LNCs. Although there was no significant difference, PD-L1 expression was variable between the lymphoma group and the control group. Maekawa et al. observed that canine DLBCL samples did not express PD-L1 [13]. Shosu and Kumar et al. reported the expression of PD-L1 in few lymphoma tissues and cell lines [14, 33]. Our results are in agreement with those from the previous reports. In humans, the proportion of DLBCL tumor cells that express PD-L1 was ranged from 10.0 to 49.0% [36, 37]. Further studies are needed to clarify the expression of PD-L1 and the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in canine B cell lymphoma using a large sample size. Interestingly, low expression of CD80 was observed in canine lymphoma samples. CD80, also known as B7.1, is a coregulatory receptor expressed on the surface of antigen presenting cells, activated T cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Full activation of T cells requires binding of the CD28 receptor by CD80 or CD86 on antigen-presenting cells [38]. It was reported that CD80 is expressed in the majority of human DLBCL cases and is also present on nonmalignant stromal cells [39]. In contrast, one study revealed that acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells have low expression of costimulatory molecules including CD80 and suggested that this probably contributes to the absence of a host T cell-stimulated immune response [40]. This is the first report of the evaluation of CD80 expression in canine B cell lymphomas. Further understanding of the expression of this marker, as well as other immune coregulatory molecules that control immune cell function, will be needed to better understand the complexity and functional implications of the tumor microenvironment in canine B cell high grade lymphoma.

In this study, CTLA-4 expression on peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes obtained from LNCs was found to be associated with poor prognosis in canine B cell high grade lymphomas. Especially, high expression of CTLA-4 in PBMCs was significantly correlated with substage b, which has been identified as an indicator of poor prognosis. Although the prognostic role and clinical application of CTLA-4 in tumors are still controversial, increased CTLA-4 expression on T cells contributes to poor prognosis in various cancers including DLBCL [41, 42]. In addition, CTLA-4 is a negative immunomodulatory factor that is known to be expressed by effector regulatory T cells, which mainly suppress antitumor immunity, but not by non-Tregs [41]. It was thought that expression of CTLA-4 on T cells might be associated with a worse prognosis and might represent a prognostic factor for canine B cell high grade lymphoma. In contrast, PD-1 expression on peripheral and tumor infiltrating T cells was not associated with prognosis. In humans, the relationship between PD-1 expression and prognosis in lymphoid malignancies is also complex [43]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to explore the relationship between immune checkpoint molecules and B cell lymphoma prognosis in dogs. However, we did not control for treatment and stage/substage for each analysis, and the small sample size of this study might affects the reliability of the results. Further studies using larger cohorts and controlled patients are needed to evaluate the association between immune checkpoint molecule expression and prognosis in canine B cell high grade lymphomas.

PD-1-and CTLA-4-blocking antibodies (ipilimumab and nivolumab) were shown to produce robust responses and improve overall survival in human patients with various lymphoid malignancies [43]. Interestingly, in canine visceral leishmaniasis, high level of PD-1 on T cells and in vitro efficacy of monoclonal antibodies that block PD-1 and its ligands have been reported [24, 25]. Recently, in veterinary medicine, a pilot study demonstrated promising anticancer activity with tolerable toxicity profiles using an anti-PD-L1 antibody for canine malignancies [44]. The results of the present study indicated that such immunotherapy regimens might also be effective for patients with canine B cell high grade lymphoma.

Several limitations should be noted when interpreting the results of this study. First, the small sample size for each analysis might limit the power to detect differences between groups. Therefore, our findings should be verified in a larger population, as this study represents a pilot study. Second, the treatment modality for the dogs with lymphoma was not unified. A future prospective study using standardized treatment is thus necessary for adequate evaluation. Another limitation of our method is the lack of protein quantification of the immune checkpoint ligands. Finally, it remains unclear whether the expression of immune checkpoint molecules on tumor cells or other nonmalignant cells is associated with the anti-tumor immune response and clinical outcome in canine lymphoma patients. Future functional analyses are necessary to elucidate the complex roles of this pathway.

In summary, this study indicates that PD-1 expression is up-regulated on both peripheral and tumor infiltrating T cells and that CTLA-4 expression is up-regulated on CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood obtained from dogs with B cell high grade lymphoma. CTLA-4 expression on T cells was also associated with a poor prognosis. Our findings support the hypothesis that these molecules might represent new therapeutic targets for the treatment of canine B cell high grade lymphoma, and could serve as prognostic factors. Future investigations and clinical trials are needed to develop therapeutic strategies based on the mechanisms of immune checkpoint molecule-induced tumor immune evasion and the modulation of host immune responses for canine B cell high grade lymphoma.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Fig. Analysis of a PBMC sample for PD-1 expression in the CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte gate.

A representative sample of forward versus side scatter identified the predominant lymphocyte population captured in region P1. The proportions of CD4 (P2) and CD8 (P3) cells in P1 are indicated (A). The proportions of PD-1 expression cells in P2 and P3 are indicated in the middle panels (B). The under panels show each isotype control (C). SSC, side scatter; FSC, forward scatter; PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; APC, allophycocyanin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. MFI of PD-1+ and CTLA-4+ cells in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte populations from dogs with B cell lymphoma and control animals.

Each dot represents a patient and the bar represents the median. P values are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. Clinical features and treatment modality comparisons between dogs with each parameter level below and above the cutoff values.

Chemotherapy included CHOP-based and L-asparaginase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the veterinary technicians at the veterinary medical center of Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine for assistance with sample collection.

Citation: Tagawa M, Kurashima C, Takagi S, Maekawa N, Konnai S, Shimbo G, et al. (2018) Evaluation of costimulatory molecules in dogs with B cell high grade lymphoma. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0201222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201222

References

1. Vail DM, Pinkerton ME, Young KM: Hematopoietic tumors. In: Withrow SJ, Vail DM, editors. Withrow and MacEwen’s Small Animal Clinical Oncology. 5th ed: Saunders Elsevier, St Louis, MO, 2013. pp. 608–678.

2. Siedlecki CT, Kass PH, Jakubiak MJ, Dank G, Lyons J, Kent MS. Evaluation of an actinomycin-D-containing combination chemotherapy protocol with extended maintenance therapy for canine lymphoma. Can Vet J. 2006;47: 52–59. pmid:16536229

3. Lenz JA, Robat CS, Stein TJ. Vinblastine as a second rescue for the treatment of canine multicentric lymphoma in 39 cases (2005 to 2014). J Small Anim Pract. 2016;57: 429–434. pmid:27251593

4. Aresu L. Canine Lymphoma, More Than a Morphological Diagnosis: What We Have Learned about Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Front Vet Sci. 2016;3: 77. pmid:27630997

5. Greenwald RJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. The B7 family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23: 515–548. pmid:15771580

6. Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26: 677–704. pmid:18173375

7. Folkl A, Bienzle D. Structure and function of programmed death (PD) molecules. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010;15: 33–38.

8. Wülfing C, Tunbridge HM, Wraith DC. New inhibitory signaling by CTLA-4. Nat Immunol. 2014;15: 408–409. pmid:24747703

9. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27: 450–461. pmid:25858804

10. Waki K, Yamada T, Yoshiyama K, Terazaki Y, Sakamoto S, Matsueda S, et al. PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets correlates with prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2014;105: 1229–1235. pmid:25117757

11. Nakanishi J, Wada Y, Matsumoto K, Azuma M, Kikuchi K, Ueda S. Overexpression of B7-H1 (PD-L1) significantly associates with tumor grade and postoperative prognosis in human urothelial cancers. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2007;56: 1173–1182 pmid:17186290

12. Callahan MK, Postow MA, Wolchok JD. Targeting T cell co-receptors for cancer therapy. Immunity. 2016;44: 1069–1078. pmid:27192570

13. Maekawa N, Konnai S, Okagawa T, Nishimori A, Ikebuchi R, Izumi Y, et al. Immunohistochemical Analysis of PD-L1 Expression in Canine Malignant Cancers and PD-1 Expression on Lymphocytes in Canine Oral Melanoma. PLoS One. 2016;11: e0157176. pmid:27276060

14. Shosu K, Sakurai M, Inoue K, Nakagawa T, Sakai H, Morimoto M, et al. Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Canine Cancer. In Vivo. 2016;30: 195–204. pmid:27107075

15. Filley A, Henriquez M, Bhowmik T, Tewari BN, Rao X, Wan J, et al. Immunologic and gene expression profiles of spontaneous canine oligodendrogliomas. J Neurooncol. 2018 Jan 12. pmid:29330750

16. Tagawa M, Maekawa N, Konnai S, Takagi S. Evaluation of Costimulatory Molecules in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Canine Patients with Histiocytic Sarcoma. PLoS One. 2016;11: e0150030. pmid:26901565

17. Thanarajasingam G, Thanarajasingam U, Ansell SM. Immune checkpoint blockade in lymphoid malignancies. FEBS J. 2016;283: 2233–2244. pmid:26807978

18. Bryan LJ, Gordon LI. Blocking tumor escape in hematologic malignancies: the anti-PD-1 strategy. Blood Rev. 2015;29: 25–32. pmid:25260226

19. Kiyasu J, Miyoshi H, Hirata A, Arakawa F, Ichikawa A, Niino D, et al. Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 is associated with poor overall survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2015;126: 2193–2201. pmid:26239088

20. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Leroy K, Yu X, Gaulard P, Gascoyne RD, et al. Molecular diagnosis of primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma identifies a clinically favorable subgroup of diffuse large B cell lymphoma related to Hodgkin lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2003;198: 851–862. pmid:12975453

21. Vail DM, MacEwen EG. Spontaneously occurring tumors of companion animals as models for human cancer. Cancer Invest. 2000:18: 781–792. pmid:11107448

22. Owen LN. TNM Classification of Tumours in Domestic Animals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 1980

23. Rydbirk R, Folke J, Winge K, Aznar S, Pakkenberg B, Brudek T. Assessment of brain reference genes for RT-qPCR studies in neurodegenerative diseases. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37116. pmid:27853238

24. Esch KJ, Juelsgaard R, Martinez PA, Jones DE, Petersen CA. Programmed death 1-mediated T cell exhaustion during visceral leishmaniasis impairs phagocyte function. J Immunol. 2013;191: 5542–5550. pmid:24154626

25. Chiku VM, Silva KL, de Almeida BF, Venturin GL, Leal AA, de Martini CC, et al. PD-1 function in apoptosis of T lymphocytes in canine visceral leishmaniasis. Immunobiology. 2016:221: 879–888. pmid:27016050

26. Peters IR, Peeters D, Helps CR, Day MJ. Development and application of multiple internal reference (housekeeper) gene assays for accurate normalisation of canine gene expression studies. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007;117: 55–66. pmid:17346803

27. Xu-Monette ZY, Zhou J, Young KH. PD-1 expression and clinical PD-1 blockade in B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2018; 131: 68–83. pmid:29118007

28. Bai JF, Zuo MX, Zhang Y, Feng J, Han X, Zhou DB, et al. PD-1 expression on the surface of peripheral blood CD4+ T cell and its association with the prognosis of patients with peripheral T/NK cell lymphoma. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016;37: 916–918. pmid:27801329

29. Zhang W, Bai JF, Zuo MX, Cao XX, Chen M, Zhang Y, et al. PD-1 expression on the surface of peripheral blood CD4+ T cell and its association with the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Med. 2016;5: 3077–3084. pmid:27709793

30. Yang ZZ, Grote DM, Ziesmer SC, Xiu B, Novak AJ, Ansell SM. PD-1 expression defines two distinct T-cell sub-populations in follicular lymphoma that differentially impact patient survival. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5: e281. pmid:25700246

31. Motta M, Rassenti L, Shelvin BJ, Lerner S, Kipps TJ, Keating MJ, et al. Increased expression of CD152 (CTLA-4) by normal T lymphocytes in untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2005;19: 1788–1793. pmid:16094420

32. Yang ZZ, Novak AJ, Stenson MJ, Witzig TE, Ansell SM. Intratumoral CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell-mediated suppression of infiltrating CD4+ T cells in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2006;107: 3639–3646. pmid:16403912

33. Kumar SR, Kim DY, Henry CJ, Bryan JN, Robinson KL, Eaton AM. Programmed death ligand 1 is expressed in canine B cell lymphoma and downregulated by MEK inhibitors. Vet Comp Oncol. 2017;15: 1527–1536. pmid:28111882

34. Hartley G, Elmslie R, Dow S, Guth A. Checkpoint molecule expression by B and T cell lymphomas in dogs. Vet Comp Oncol. 2018 Jan 30. pmid:29380929

35. Kamphorst AO, Ahmed R. CD4 T-cell immunotherapy for chronic viral infections and cancer. Immunotherapy. 2013;5: 975–987. pmid:23998732

36. Panjwani PK, Charu V, DeLisser M, Molina-Kirsch H, Natkunam Y, Zhao S. Programmed death-1 ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 show distinctive and restricted patterns of expression in lymphoma subtypes. Hum Pathol. 2018;71: 91–99. pmid:29122656

37. Hu LY, Xu XL, Rao HL, Chen J, Lai RC, Huang HQ, et al. Expression and clinical value of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a retrospective study. Chin J Cancer. 2017; 36: 94. pmid:29246182

38. Wülfing C, Tunbridge HM, Wraith DC. New inhibitory signaling by CTLA-4. Nat Immunol. 2014;15: 408–409. pmid:24747703

39. Dakappagari N, Ho SN, Gascoyne RD, Ranuio J, Weng AP, Tangri S. CD80 (B7.1) is expressed on both malignant B cells and nonmalignant stromal cells in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2012;82: 112–119. pmid:22076940

40. Luczyński W, Stasiak-Barmuta A, Iłendo E, Kovalchuk O, Krawczuk-Rybak M, Malinowska I, et al. Low expression of costimulatory molecules and mRNA for cytokines are important mechanisms of immunosuppression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children? Neoplasma. 2006;53: 301–304. pmid:16830056

41. Nakayama S, Yokote T, Akioka T, Hiraoka N, Nishiwaki U, Miyoshi T, et al. Infiltration of effector regulatory T cells predicts poor prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Blood Adv. 2017;1: 486–493. pmid:29296965

42. Hu P, Liu Q, Deng G, Zhang J, Liang N, Xie J, et al. The prognostic value of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 42913. pmid:28211499

43. Hude I, Sasse S, Engert A, Bröckelmann PJ. The emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibition in malignant lymphoma. Haematologica. 2017;102: 30–42. pmid:27884973

44. Maekawa N, Konnai S, Takagi S, Kagawa Y, Okagawa T, Nishimori A, et al. A canine chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 and its clinical efficacy in canine oral malignant melanoma or undifferentiated sarcoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 8951. pmid:28827658