It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The optical selection rules in epitaxial quantum dots are strongly influenced by the orientation of their natural quantization axis, which is usually parallel to the growth direction. This configuration is well suited for vertically emitting devices, but not for planar photonic circuits because of the poorly controlled orientation of the transition dipoles in the growth plane. Here we show that the quantization axis of gallium arsenide dots can be flipped into the growth plane via moderate in-plane uniaxial stress. By using piezoelectric strain-actuators featuring strain amplification, we study the evolution of the selection rules and excitonic fine structure in a regime, in which quantum confinement can be regarded as a perturbation compared to strain in determining the symmetry-properties of the system. The experimental and computational results suggest that uniaxial stress may be the right tool to obtain quantum-light sources with ideally oriented transition dipoles and enhanced oscillator strengths for integrated quantum photonics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
2 Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
3 Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria; Departamento de Física, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
4 Forschungszentrum Mikrotechnik, FH Vorarlberg, Dornbirn, Austria
5 Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
6 Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria; Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, IFW Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai, China
7 Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, IFW Dresden, Dresden, Germany
8 Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria; Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy