Content area

Abstract

Purpose

Several efforts have attempted to incorporate the sources of uncertainty and variability into the life cycle assessment (LCA) of pavements. However, no method has been proposed that can simultaneously consider data quality, methodological choices, and variability in inputs and outputs without the need for complementary software. This study aims to develop and implement a flexible method that can be used in the LCA software to assess the effects of these sources on the conclusions.

Methods

A Monte Carlo analysis was conducted and applied in a comparative LCA of pavements to assess the preferred scenario. The uncertainty of the results was first estimated by considering the data quality using the ecoinvent database. Moreover, the variabilities of the materials, construction methods, and repair stages of the pavement life cycle were included in the analysis by assigning continuous uniform probability distributions to each variable. Ultimately, the probability of methodological choices was modeled using uniform distributions and assigning a portion of the area of the distribution to each scenario. The individual and combined effects of these uncertainty and variability sources were assessed in a comparative LCA of asphalt and concrete pavements in a cold region such as Quebec (Canada).

Results and discussion

The results of the Monte Carlo analysis show that the allocation choices can change the environmentally preferred scenario in four midpoint categories. These categories are significantly dominated by the crude oil supply chain. The variability in construction materials and methods can change the preferred scenario in the damage categories, namely, human health and global warming. Additionally, parameter uncertainty has a significant effect on the conclusion of the preferred scenario in ecosystem quality. The worst qualitative scores are given to the geographical uncertainty of the elementary flow that primarily contributes to this category (i.e., zinc). The simultaneous effect of the uncertainty and variability sources prevents the decision-maker from reaching a less uncertain conclusion about ecosystem quality, human health, and global warming effects.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that it is feasible to assess the cumulative effects of common uncertainty and variability sources using commercial LCA software, including Monte Carlo simulation. Based on the variability and uncertainty of the results, the identification of a certain conclusion is case specific at both the midpoint and endpoint levels. Increasing the quality of the inventory is one solution to decreasing the uncertainties related to human health, ecosystem quality, and global warming regarding pavement LCA. This improvement can be achieved by avoiding the adaptation of a similar process to match the considered process and using practical construction efficiencies and realistic construction materials. The effectiveness of these tasks must be assessed in future studies. It should be noted that these conclusions were determined regardless of the uncertainty in the characterization factors of the impact assessment method.

Details

Title
Assessing the individual and combined effects of uncertainty and variability sources in comparative LCA of pavements
Author
AzariJafari, Hessam 1 ; Yahia, Ammar 2 ; Amor, Ben 3 

 Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory on Sustainable Engineering and Ecodesign (LIRIDE), Department of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; NSERC Research Chair on Development and Use of Fluid Concrete with Adapted Rheology, Department of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada 
 NSERC Research Chair on Development and Use of Fluid Concrete with Adapted Rheology, Department of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada 
 Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory on Sustainable Engineering and Ecodesign (LIRIDE), Department of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada 
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1888-1902
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Sep 2018
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
Place of publication
Dordrecht
Country of publication
Netherlands
Publication subject
ISSN
09483349
e-ISSN
16147502
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
ProQuest document ID
2088874520
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/assessing-individual-combined-effects-uncertainty/docview/2088874520/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.
Last updated
2024-11-07
Database
ProQuest One Academic