Steam Sterilization of Equine Bone Block: Morphological and Collagen Analysis

Abstract

Introduction. The use of equine bone blocks is widely reported for bone augmentation techniques. The block must be shaped according to the form of the defect that should be regenerated. The shaping could be performed by hand before or during the surgery, in a sterile ambient, or using a CNC milling machine that could not be sterile. The aim of our study was to evaluate if a steam sterilization could provide a medical grade sterilization of the blocks and to evaluate if bone microstructure and collagen structures change after different steam sterilization protocols provided by mainstream autoclave. Materials and Method. Two blocks of equine bone were divided into 16 samples. 1 sample was used as control and not submitted to any treatment. 15 samples were infected with a Streptococcus faecalis bacterial culture. The samples were singularly packed, randomly divided into 3 groups, and submitted to autoclave sterilization on the same device. The groups were submitted to a sterilization cycle (Gr. A: 121°C, 1,16 bar for 20′; Gr. B:134°C, 2,16 bar for 4′; Gr. C: 134°C, 2,16 bar for 3.30 min.). 2 samples for each group were evaluated for the sterility. 3 samples for each group were observed at SEM to notice the macro- and microstructure modification and to confocal microscope to observe the collagen. Results. All samples were sterile. The SEM evaluation showed, in all groups, a preserved morphological structure. Confocal microscope evaluation shows that the collagen structure appears to be more uniform and preserved in group C. Conclusion. Data show that autoclave steam sterilization could be reliable to obtain sterilization of equine bone blocks.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

Bone regeneration is a reliable technique when the bone volume is not sufficient to provide a long-term stability of implant-supported prosthetic restorations and functional and aesthetical outcome. It is also indicated in the posttraumatic and oncologic reconstructive protocols [1].

The autologous bone is still considered the gold standard, harvested from extra or intraoral site [2–4].

The homologous fresh frozen bone has also been reported as effective thanks to its osteoconductive and it is potentially osteoinductive properties linked to its matrix contains growth factors such as bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [5, 6].

However, in bone regeneration procedures, due to the increased morbidity, limited quantities available and the necessity of a second surgical site are widely used xenogenic materials of bovine, porcine, or equine origins [7, 8].

Xenografts, thanks to their chemical-physical characteristics similar to those of the human bone, show osteoconductive properties [9, 10].

Enzyme-deantigenic equine bone has been used successfully in several fields of oral surgery and implantology [11] including periapical cyst-removal management, periodontal defect correction [12], horizontal and vertical atrophic ridge reconstruction [13–17], and sinus augmentation [18–22].

Equine-derived biomaterials may be preferred to those of bovine or porcine origins for issues related to Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies. It is well known in fact that rabbits, dogs, and horses are the only mammalian species reported to be resistant to infection from prion diseases isolated from other species [23, 24].

In equine bone, an enzymatic process to preserve the native conformation of type I collagen equine bone is used while making the bone nonantigenic. The bone collagen matrix contains a high amount of growth factors such as IGF-II, TGF-beta, IGF-I, PDGF, bFGF, BMPs, and others [25] and this implies that the demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is able to stimulate the production of new bone tissue [25] when grafted in another species [26–28].

Regarding cellular behavior, it has been found that when osteoclasts were cultured on enzyme-deantigenic equine bone, they adhered on this material in greater numbers and exerted a more intense degrading activity [29] compared to inorganic bovine bone [30], possibly because of the presence of preserved collagen in the equine xenograft.

In vitro studies showed the effects of preserved bone’s collagen on biological mechanisms related to bone regeneration. A randomized clinical trial found that enzyme-deantigenic equine bone led to a significantly greater amount of newly formed bone and a lower residual biomaterial, compared with inorganic bovine bone [31].

The bone substitutes may be used in different forms such as block or particulate along with the application of a long-lasting membrane to prevent soft tissue cells from invading the regenerating site (GBR) [32].

It has been reported that a bone block is a reliable material for regenerative procedures with predictable long-term positive results [33]. The space maintaining characteristics of the blocks can overcome the poor three-dimensional stability of the particulate substitutes offering an adequate mechanical support to the overlying tissue [16, 34, 35].

Allograft and xenograft bone substitutes underwent to procedures that greatly lower the potential risk of transmission of bacteria, viruses, and prions.

Different sterilization techniques are used for autologous tissues including gamma irradiation [36], ethylene oxide gas [37], thermal treatment with moist heat [38], beta-propiolactone [39], chemical processing [40], and antibiotic soaks [41].

In xenografts, the microbial safety is generally achieved through gamma or electron-beam (e-beam) irradiation [42]. E-beam irradiation may be preferred to gamma because the more precise dose control allows a shorter irradiation time [43, 44].

In the common dental practice, the autoclave is used to obtain a high-grade sterility of various kind of material [45–47].

The aim of our research was to evaluate if different autoclave sterilization protocols may modify the macroscopical and microscopical bone structure of an equine block and if this protocols will affect the collagen matrix.

2. Materials and Method

Two equine bone blocks (10x20x5 mm) with collagen (OX Block, Osteoxenon, Bioteck, Italy) were divided into 16 samples of cubic shape (5x5x5 mm) using a stainless steel bone cutter Lindemann bur (Komet, Komet It Srl, Italy).

2.1. Sterilization Test

One sample was used as control and not submitted to any treatment.

15 samples were infected with a bacterial culture.

The Streptococcus faecalis, used for sterilization test, was previously isolated from a pharyngeal buffer and incubated, under standardized conditions, for 24 h. in sterile thioglycollate broth at 37±2 C.

The pH-values of the broths were measured at the beginning and end of each incubation cycle.

1 ml of thioglycollate broth contained 1 × 10⁵ CFU/ml Streptococcus faecalis colonies.

Each sample was contaminated by using sterile micropipettes, with 0,5 ml of thioglycollate broth.

The 15 samples were randomly divided in 3 groups and submitted to autoclave sterilization in the same device (Euronda E9 Med, Euronda, Italy).

A group was submitted to a sterilization cycle at 121°C, 1,16 bar for 20 min. and 15 min. of drying.

B group was submitted to a sterilization cycle at 134°C at 2,16 bar for 4 min. of sterilization and 15 min. of drying.

C group was submitted to a sterilization cycle at 134°C at 2,16 bar for 3.30 min. of sterilization and 5 min. of drying.

Two samples for each group were evaluated for the sterility.

1 sample per group was incubated under standardized conditions for 24 h in thioglycollate broth at 37±2°C.

1 sample per group was incubated under standardized conditions for 24 h in normal saline solution at 37±2°C.

To evaluate the sterilization effects, 18 μl of thioglycollate and 18 μl of normal saline solution were collected and incubated for 24 h at 37±2°C in CLED agar and ESCULINA agar, for the bacterial count.

After 24 h of incubation the bacterial presence was evaluated by a conventional biochemical test and colonies were counted and interpreted as colony-forming units.

2.2. Structural Evaluation

After autoclave steam sterilization, the 9 samples that were not evaluated for sterility underwent to SEM (Phenom Pro 5, Phenom-World B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands) observation to directly observe the macroscopical and microscopical structure.

Each sample was fractured to observe an uncut surface.

All 9 samples underwent to optical observation to evaluate the macroscopical structural modification.

Three randomly areas of each surface were observed at the same magnification and the microstructural changes were recorded.

After the SEM observation the 12 samples underwent to the confocal microscope observation to evaluate the collagen presence. The uncut and unfractured surface was observed.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy Protocol

After fixation in 2% glutaraldehyde, specimens were dehydrated in ethanol and amyl acetate and then were dried at critical point in a Balzers critical point drier using liquid CO2. The bone fractured surfaces were mounted on stub and platinum coated with a sputtering system “Plasma Sciences CrC-100 Turbo Pumped” and observed by Phenom G2 pro scanning electron microscope.

2.4. Confocal Microscope Protocol

After fixation in 2% glutaraldehyde and rinsing in phosphate buffer 0,13 mol/L, pH 7.3, specimens were decalcified in 4.13% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, pH 7.2, dehydrated in ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. A Leica microtome (Leica RM2255, Leica, Leica Biosystems, MI, Italy) was used to obtain eight-micrometer-thick sections.

The sections were treated with the following antibodies: mouse monoclonal anticollagen I (diluted 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich) which were demonstrated with IgG-Texas Red conjugated anti-rabbit (1:100 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) [48, 49].

Negative controls were carried out by treating the sections only with the secondary antibody. The samples were observed with the Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510, Carl Zeiss S.p.A., MI, Italy). The “display profile” function of the laser scanning microscope was used to show the intensity profile across an image along a freely selectable line [50].

3. Results

3.1. Sterilization Test

The sterility was achieved in all samples, considering a SAL (Sterility Assurance Level) of 10⁻⁶.

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation

Group A: image shows a defined bone architecture with cavities of spherical shape delimited by a dense trabeculation (42x) (Figure 1).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

It is possible to observe in detail a trabecula, which delimits two cavities, and it is possible to see the presence of some residues of different shapes and sizes. Bone morphology appears to be well preserved (1100x) (Figure 2).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

Group B and group C: images show a cavity of ovoid and spherical shape delimitated by a dense trabeculation (40x) (Figures 3 and 4).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF] [figure omitted; refer to PDF]

Increasing the magnification, it is possible to observe a trabecula with smaller communicating cavities; the trabecula surface appears to be well preserved (2500x) (Figures 5 and 6).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF] [figure omitted; refer to PDF]

3.3. Confocal Microscope Evaluation

Group A: the image shows that type 1 collagen of the sample presents a fluorescence pattern that is located at the periphery of the trabecula continuously. A feeble fluorescence can be observed at the edges of some gap (Figure 7).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

Group B: the images show that type 1 collagen of the sample presents a fluorescence pattern that is located at the periphery of the trabecula sometimes continuous and intense, sometimes weak and widespread. A feeble fluorescence is observed at the edges. This group appears to be similar to group A (Figure 8).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

Group C: the image shows that type 1 collagen of the sample presents a fluorescence pattern that is located at the periphery of the trabecula in a continuous and uniform manner. The entire trabecula has a weak diffuse fluorescence pattern with a circumferential course, sometimes more marked around the gaps (Figure 9).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

Display profile shows the fluorescence intensity along a selected line.

The fluorescent signal intensity appears more pronounced and uniform in group C when compared to groups A and B. Comparing group A and group B a greater signal intensity is evident in group A (Figure 10).

[figure omitted; refer to PDF]

4. Discussion

The bone augmentation procedure is widely studied in literature and commonly used in clinical practice and might be mandatory in different clinical situations in both medicine and dentistry [5].

Materials different for origin and composition were deeply studied by the scientific community and the differences between the particulate form and the bone block are commonly known.

Several studies analyzed the employment of bone equine-derived block containing collagen for ridge augmentation [51–53]. These researches revealed the advantageous capacity to maintain the dimensions of the augmented ridge. Benic et al. demonstrated that the GBR technique performed with equine block with collagen membranes (CM) resulted in the most favorable outcomes compared to bovine block and bovine granulate with CM [35].

It is mandatory to shape the bone block according to the defect that should be filled. The shaping could be performed by the industry that, according to a CBCT provided by the clinician, could send a preshaped and sterilized block or a handmade “in-house” shaping before or during the surgery. The handmade shaping has, however, a lack of precision related to the method of shaping. To overcome this issue a CNC milling machine could be used. This machine has a micrometer precision and in addition to a three-dimensional reconstruction could provide the clinician a precise model; however, due to its characteristic, the sterility requirement is not satisfying and must be achieved after shaping, using other techniques [54].

Cusinato et al. [55] demonstrated the efficacy of hydrogen peroxide treatment and e-beam irradiation on viral clearance in equine-derived xenografts (pericardium membrane, collagen membrane, and cortical and cancellous bone grafts) spiked with three human viruses (Coxsackie virus B1, influenza virus type A with subtype H1N1, and herpes simplex virus type 1).

Our work shows how it is possible to obtain a satisfactory sterility of the graft, using a traditional device as the autoclave.

The microbiological analysis shows how, in agreement with the literature, the sterility was achieved in all samples.

Our research was also aimed at understanding if this procedure might modify the bone morphology and the collagen.

The eye observation of the samples shows a fairly dehydrated and a slightly lighter white surface when compared to the control sample.

The SEM observations between the control sample and the samples of the three groups underline how, at different magnifications, the macrostructure does not show substantial modifications [56].

In all samples, the bone structure appears to be well preserved and the morphology appears to be very similar. It is evident how the high temperature did not determine evident and significant modifications of the bone sample architecture.

The collagen matrix that is a particular characteristic of the equine bone graft and is preserved due to the impossibility of this species to be infected with prions appears to be variously maintained.

The confocal microscope immunofluorescence analysis shows how group C (131 fast) has the best-preserved collagen structure. This observation is also confirmed by the display profile analysis, which evaluating the fluorescence intensity underlines how the fluorescent signal appears to be more uniform and intense when compared to the other groups. When comparing A and B groups, the first one shows a stronger and a uniform fluorescence.

The temperatures reached in steam autoclave sterilization appear to be respectful of the collagen fibril that remains always below the thermal transitions temperatures [57, 58].

The collagen resistance to heat and pressure damage, so, appears to be time related. When a steam sterilization is performed a 134°C and 2,16 bar for 3.30 min. and 5 min. of drying protocol is suggested.

From the analysis of our data, autoclave steam sterilization method could be a reliable way to obtain sterilization of bone graft.

Giving the possibility of using a nonsterile CNC milling machine will open a new scenario of precision in bone grafting, letting the surgeon to obtain a perfectly shaped and sterilized graft wherever before the surgery.

5. Conclusion

The autoclave sterilization appears to be a reliable way to obtain a medical grade sterilization of the equine bone blocks and it does not affect the macro- and the microstructure and the collagen fiber.

Further studies are necessary to evaluate if there are any chemical modification and to evaluate if there are changes in the in vivo osteointegration process of the bone that underwent the steam sterilization protocol.

Conflicts of Interest

The study did not receive any financial support and there were not any conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All individuals listed as authors have contributed substantially to the design, performance, analysis, and reporting of the work. No others contributors to the articles than the authors accredited.

References

[1] S. S. Jensen, H. Terheyden, "Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials," The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 24, pp. 218-236, 2009.

[2] G. A. Catone, B. L. Reimer, D. McNeir, R. Ray, "Tibial autogenous cancellous bone as an alternative donor site in maxillofacial surgery: A preliminary report," Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 50 no. 12, pp. 1258-1263, DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90223-M, 1992.

[3] M. G. Donovan, N. C. Dickerson, J. C. Mitchell, "Calvarial Bone Harvest and Grafting Techniques for Maxillary and Mandibular Implant Surgery," Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, vol. 2 no. 2, pp. 109-122, DOI: 10.1016/S1061-3315(18)30136-7, 1994.

[4] C. M. Misch, "Bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible for dental implants using rhBMP-2 and titanium mesh: clinical technique and early results," International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 31 no. 6, pp. 581-589, 2011.

[5] F. S. de Ponte, G. Cutroneo, R. Falzea, G. Rizzo, L. Catalfamo, A. Favaloro, G. Vermiglio, M. Runci, A. Centofanti, G. Anastasi, "Histochemical and morphological aspects of fresh frozen bone: A preliminary study," European Journal of Histochemistry, vol. 60 no. 4, 2016.

[6] A. S. Herford, M. Cicciù, L. F. Eftimie, M. Miller, F. Signorino, F. Famà, G. Cervino, G. Lo Giudice, E. Bramanti, F. Lauritano, G. Troiano, L. Lo Muzio, L. Laino, "rhBMP-2 applied as support of distraction osteogenesis: A split-mouth histological study over nonhuman primates mandibles," International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 9 no. 9, pp. 17187-17194, 2016.

[7] M. Cicciù, "Real opportunity for the present and a forward step for the future of bone tissue engineering," The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 28 no. 3, pp. 592-593, DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003595, 2017.

[8] M. Cicciù, G. Cervino, A. S. Herford, F. Famà, E. Bramanti, L. Fiorillo, F. Lauritano, S. Sambataro, G. Troiano, L. Laino, "Facial Bone Reconstruction Using Both Marine or Non-Marine Bone Substitutes: Evaluation of Current Outcomes in a Systematic Literature Review," Marine Drugs, vol. 16 no. 1, 2018.

[9] M. Esposito, M. G. Grusovin, P. Coulthard, H. V. Worthington, "The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials," The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 21 no. 5, pp. 696-710, 2006.

[10] G. Orsini, A. Scarano, M. Piattelli, M. Piccirilli, S. Caputi, A. Piattelli, "Histologic and ultrastructural analysis of regenerated bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using a porcine bone-derived biomaterial," Journal of Periodontology, vol. 77 no. 12, pp. 1984-1990, DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060181, 2006.

[11] R. Crespi, P. Capparé, G. Crespi, G. Lo Giudice, G. Gastaldi, E. Gherlone, "Dental Implants Placed in Periodontally Infected Sites in Humans," Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 131-139, DOI: 10.1111/cid.12425, 2017.

[12] R. Crespi, P. Capparé, G. Crespi, G. Lo Giudice, G. Gastaldi, E. Gherlone, "Immediate Implant Placement in Sockets with Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis," Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 20-27, DOI: 10.1111/cid.12422, 2017.

[13] T. Traini, P. Valentini, G. Iezzi, A. Piattelli, "A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone retrieved 9 years after a sinus augmentation procedure," Journal of Periodontology, vol. 78 no. 5, pp. 955-961, DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060308, 2007.

[14] A. Barone, P. Toti, A. Quaranta, F. Alfonsi, A. Cucchi, B. Negri, R. Di Felice, S. Marchionni, J. L. Calvo-Guirado, U. Covani, U. Nannmark, "Clinical and Histological changes after ridge preservation with two xenografts: preliminary results from a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial," Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 44 no. 2, pp. 204-214, DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12655, 2017.

[15] P. Felice, L. Piana, L. Checchi, V. Corvino, U. Nannmark, M. Piattelli, "Vertical ridge augmentation of an atrophic posterior mandible with an inlay technique and cancellous equine bone block: A case report," International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 33 no. 2, pp. 159-166, DOI: 10.11607/prd.1098, 2013.

[16] R. Pistilli, L. Signorini, A. Pisacane, G. Lizio, P. Felice, "Case of severe bone atrophy of the posterior maxilla rehabilitated with blocks of equine origin bone: Histological results," Implant Dentistry, vol. 22 no. 1,DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182777239, 2013.

[17] N. De Angelis, M. Scivetti, "Lateral ridge augmentation using an equine flex bone block infused with recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB: A clinical and histologic study," International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 31 no. 4, pp. 383-388, 2011.

[18] D. A. di Stefano, L. Artese, G. Iezzi, A. Piattelli, S. Pagnutti, M. Piccirilli, V. Perrotti, "Alveolar ridge regeneration with equine spongy bone: a clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical case series," Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 11 no. 2, pp. 90-100, DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00104.x, 2009.

[19] L. Artese, A. Piattelli, D. A. Di Stefano, M. Piccirilli, S. Pagnutti, E. D'Alimonte, V. Perrotti, "Sinus lift with autologous bone alone or in addition to equine bone: an immunohistochemical study in man," Implant Dentistry, vol. 20 no. 5, pp. 383-388, DOI: 10.1097/id.0b013e3182310b3d, 2011.

[20] S. Tetè, R. Vinci, V. L. Zizzari, S. Zara, V. La Scala, A. Cataldi, E. Gherlone, A. Piattelli, "Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures through equine-derived biomaterial or calvaria autologous bone: Immunohistochemical evaluation of OPG/RANKL in humans," European Journal of Histochemistry, vol. 57 no. 1, pp. 60-65, 2013.

[21] G. Lo Giudice, G. Iannello, A. Terranova, R. Lo Giudice, G. Pantaleo, M. Cicciù, "Transcrestal sinus lift procedure approaching atrophic maxillary ridge: A 60-month clinical and radiological follow-up evaluation," International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2015, 2015.

[22] S. Tetè, V. L. Zizzari, R. Vinci, S. Zara, U. Di Tore, M. Manica, A. Cataldi, C. Mortellaro, A. Piattelli, E. Gherlone, "Equine and porcine bone substitutes in maxillary sinus augmentation: A histological and immunohistochemical analysis of VEGF expression," The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 25 no. 3, pp. 835-839, DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000679, 2014.

[23] J. Talairach, P. Thournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain,DOI: 10.1007/springerreference, 1988.

[24] J. Zhang, "The structural stability of wild-type horse prion protein," Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, vol. 29 no. 2, pp. 369-377, DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2011.10507391, 2011.

[25] D. J. Pacaccio, S. F. Stern, "Demineralized bone matrix: Basic science and clinical applications," Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, vol. 22 no. 4, pp. 599-606, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2005.07.001, 2005.

[26] K. D. Chesmel, J. Branger, H. Wertheim, N. Scarborough, "Healing response to various forms of human demineralized bone matrix in athymic rat cranial defects," Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 56 no. 7, pp. 857-865, DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90015-5, 1998.

[27] S. Guizzardi, R. Scandroglio, M. D. Silvestre, R. Savini, A. Ruggeri, "Implants of heterologous demineralized bone matrix for induction of posterior spinal fusion in rats," The Spine Journal, vol. 17 no. 6, pp. 701-707, DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199206000-00010, 1992.

[28] M. S. Rafael, V. Laizé, M. L. Cancela, "Identification of Sparus aurata bone morphogenetic protein 2: Molecular cloning, gene expression and in silico analysis of protein conserved features in vertebrates," Bone, vol. 39 no. 6, pp. 1373-1381, DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.06.021, 2006.

[29] V. Perrotti, B. M. Nicholls, A. Piattelli, "Human osteoclast formation and activity on an equine spongy bone substitute," Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20 no. 1, pp. 17-23, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01608.x, 2009.

[30] V. Perrotti, B. M. Nicholls, M. A. Horton, A. Piattelli, "Human osteoclast formation and activity on a xenogenous bone mineral," Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 90 no. 1, pp. 238-246, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32079, 2009.

[31] D. A. L. Di Stefano, G. Gastaldi, R. Vinci, L. Cinci, L. Pieri, E. Gherlone, "Histomorphometric Comparison of Enzyme-Deantigenic Equine Bone and Anorganic Bovine Bone in Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 3-Year Follow-Up," The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, vol. 30 no. 5, pp. 1161-1167, DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4057, 2015.

[32] I. Elgali, O. Omar, C. Dahlin, P. Thomsen, "Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited," European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 125 no. 5, pp. 315-337, DOI: 10.1111/eos.12364, 2017.

[33] J. Waasdorp, M. A. Reynolds, "Allogeneic bone onlay grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review.," The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 25 no. 3, pp. 525-531, 2010.

[34] M. Schlee, D. Rothamel, "Ridge augmentation using customized allogenic bone blocks: Proof of concept and histological findings," Implant Dentistry, vol. 22 no. 3, pp. 212-218, DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182885fa1, 2013.

[35] G. I. Benic, D. S. Thoma, R. E. Jung, I. Sanz-Martin, S. Unger, A. Cantalapiedra, C. H. F. Hämmerle, "Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation," Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 28 no. 11, pp. e262-e270, DOI: 10.1111/clr.13011, 2017.

[36] H. Nguyen, D. A. F. Morgan, M. R. Forwood, "Sterilization of allograft bone: Effects of gamma irradiation on allograft biology and biomechanics," Cell and Tissue Banking, vol. 8 no. 2, pp. 93-105, DOI: 10.1007/s10561-006-9020-1, 2007.

[37] T. Arizono, Y. Iwamoto, K. Okuyama, Y. Sugioka, "Ethylene oxide sterilization of bone grafts: Residual gas concentration and fibroblast toxicity," Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 65 no. 6, pp. 640-642, DOI: 10.3109/17453679408994621, 1994.

[38] C. Hofmann, T. Von Garrel, L. Gotzen, "Bone bank management using a thermal disinfection system (Lobator SD-1). A critical analysis," Unfallchirurg, vol. 99 no. 7, pp. 498-508, 1996.

[39] R. G. T. Geesink, "Osteoconductive coatings for total joint arthroplasty," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. no. 395, pp. 53-65, 2002.

[40] D. J. Prolo, P. W. Pedrotti, D. H. White, "Ethylene oxide sterilization of bone, dura mater, and fascia lata for human transplantation," Neurosurgery, vol. 6 no. 5, pp. 529-539, DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198005000-00006, 1980.

[41] J. A. Tom, S. A. Rodeo, "Soft tissue allografts for knee reconstruction in sports medicine," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. no. 402, pp. 135-156, DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200209000-00012, 2002.

[42] "," Block SS Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation, 1991.

[43] E. J. Mitchell, A. M. Stawarz, R. Kayacan, C. M. Rimnac, "The effect of gamma radiation sterilization on the fatigue crack propagation resistance of human cortical bone," The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 86 no. 12, pp. 2648-2657, DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200412000-00010, 2004.

[44] M. Silindir, YA. Özeray, "Sterilization methods and the comparison of E-beam sterilization with gamma radiation sterilization," Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 34, pp. 43-53, 2009.

[45] L. C. Huesca-Espitia, M. Suvira, K. Rosenbeck, G. Korza, B. Setlow, W. Li, S. Wang, Y.-Q. Li, P. Setlow, "Effects of steam autoclave treatment on Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores," Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 121 no. 5, pp. 1300-1311, DOI: 10.1111/jam.13257, 2016.

[46] B. T. Garibaldi, M. Reimers, N. Ernst, G. Bova, E. Nowakowski, J. Bukowski, B. C. Ellis, C. Smith, L. Sauer, K. Dionne, K. C. Carroll, L. L. Maragakis, N. M. Parrish, "Validation of autoclave protocols for successful decontamination of category a medical waste generated from care of patients with serious communicable diseases," Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 55 no. 2, pp. 545-551, DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02161-16, 2017.

[47] S. Akyalcin, H. P. McIver, J. D. English, J. C. Ontiveros, R. L. Gallerano, "Effects of repeated sterilization cycles on primary stability of orthodontic mini-screws," The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 83 no. 4, pp. 674-679, DOI: 10.2319/082612-685.1, 2013.

[48] D. di Mauro, R. Gaeta, A. Arco, D. Milardi, S. Lentini, M. Runci, G. Rizzo, L. Magaudda, "Distribution of costameric proteins in normal human ventricular and atrial cardiac muscle," Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica, vol. 47 no. 4, pp. 605-608, 2009.

[49] F. Osculati, M. Bentivoglio, M. Castellucci, S. Cinti, C. Zancanaro, A. Sbarbati, "The solitary chemosensory cells and the diffuse chemosensory system of the airway," European Journal of Histochemistry, vol. 51, pp. 65-72, DOI: 10.4081/1403, 2007.

[50] G. Anastasi, G. Cutroneo, G. Santoro, A. Arco, G. Rizzo, C. Trommino, P. Bramanti, L. Soscia, A. Favaloro, "Integrins, muscle agrin and sarcoglycans during muscular inactivity conditions: An immunohistochemical study," European Journal of Histochemistry, vol. 50 no. 4, pp. 327-336, 2006.

[51] A. Barone, P. Toti, G.-B. Menchini-Fabris, P. Felice, S. Marchionni, U. Covani, "Early volumetric changes after vertical augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block graft versus onlay bone graft: A retrospective radiological study," Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, vol. 45 no. 9, pp. 1438-1447, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.018, 2017.

[52] M. Simion, M. Nevins, I. Rocchietta, F. Fontana, E. Maschera, P. Schupbach, D. M. Kim, "Vertical ridge augmentation using an equine block infused with recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB: a histologic study in a canine model," International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 29 no. 3, pp. 245-255, 2009.

[53] F. Schwarz, D. Ferrari, E. Balic, D. Buser, J. Becker, M. Sager, "Lateral ridge augmentation using equine- and bovine-derived cancellous bone blocks: a feasibility study in dogs," Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 21 no. 9, pp. 904-912, DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01951.x, 2010.

[54] F. Mangano, A. Macchi, J. A. Shibli, G. Luongo, G. Iezzi, A. Piattelli, A. Caprioglio, C. Mangano, "Maxillary ridge augmentation with custom-made CAD/CAM scaffolds. A 1-year prospective study on 10 patients," Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 40 no. 5, pp. 561-569, DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00122, 2014.

[55] R. Cusinato, M. Pacenti, T. Martello, P. Fattori, M. Morroni, G. Palù, "Effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide and electron-beam irradiation treatment for removal and inactivation of viruses in equine-derived xenografts," Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 232, pp. 39-46, DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.03.001, 2016.

[56] M. A. Rosa, P. Gugliandolo, A. Favaloro, G. Vermiglio, A. Centofanti, D. Bruschetta, G. Rizzo, "Morpho-structural alterations of sub-chondral bone tissue in patients with osteoarthritis: A scanning electron microscopy study," Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 120 no. 1, pp. 71-81, DOI: 10.13128/IJAE-16476, 2015.

[57] L. Bozec, M. Odlyha, "Thermal denaturation studies of collagen by microthermal analysis and atomic force microscopy," Biophysical Journal, vol. 101 no. 1, pp. 228-236, DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.04.033, 2011.

[58] N. A. Valente, A. Calascibetta, G. Patianna, T. Mang, M. Hatton, S. Andreana, "Thermodynamic effects of 3 different diode lasers on an implant-bone interface: An ex-vivo study with review of the literature," Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 43 no. 2, pp. 94-99, DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00188, 2017.