Content area
Full Text
Contents
- Abstract
- Relationship Belief Measures
- The Relationship Belief Inventory
- Love Attitudes Scale
- Close Relationship Beliefs Scale
- Romantic Beliefs Scale
- Overview and Hypotheses
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Measurement of Destiny and Growth Beliefs
- Other Measures
- Dating behavior
- Partners cannot change
- Storge and pragma
- The Big Five
- Coping
- Relationship information
- Relationship satisfaction
- Perceived closeness
- Results
- Convergent and Discriminant Validity: Hypotheses 1, 2, and 3
- Relations With Dating Behavior: Hypothesis 4
- Relations With Coping Strategies: Hypothesis 5
- Relations With Longevity: Hypotheses 6a, 6b, 6c, and 6d
- After the Relationship Ended: Hypothesis 7
- Discussion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Belief in romantic destiny holds that potential relationship partners are either meant for each other or they are not. As hypothesized, a longitudinal study of romantic relationships revealed that the relation between initial satisfaction and relationship longevity was stronger for those who believe in romantic destiny. In addition, belief in destiny was associated with avoidance coping strategies in dealing with relationship stressors, and with taking more responsibility for ending the relationship. Belief in growth independently holds that successful relationships are cultivated and developed, and was associated with long-term approaches to dating, relationship-maintaining coping strategies and, once the relationship had ended, disagreeing that it seemed wrong from the beginning. Implications and future research avenues are discussed.
Individuals have different beliefs about what makes for a good relationship (Fletcher & Kininmonth, 1992; Fletcher & Thomas, 1996). Indeed, the area of social cognition in close relationships continues to thrive, and relationship beliefs and knowledge structures have become a major focus (Berscheid, 1994; Fletcher & Fincham, 1991; Fletcher & Fitness, 1993). In addition, researchers are continually being urged to consider more fully the impact of cognition on relationships, and vice versa (Baldwin, 1992; Fiske, 1992; Ickes & Gonzales, 1996; Kenny, 1994; Reis & Knee, 1996; Schneider, 1991). One type of knowledge structure that has garnered much attention in the achievement and social judgment literatures, but no attention from relationship researchers, is the construct of implicit theories (Dweck, 1996; Dweck, Chiu, & Hong, 1995; Dweck, Hong, & Chiu, 1993). Implicit theories distinguish between the belief that attributes are fixed...