It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aim
Following the guidelines of DACPR may enhance bystander CPR rate after OHCA. Registry of quality measurement for DACPR has never been explored. We designed a nationwide quality registry for DACPR performance and innovated a structured format of measurement.
Method
A nationwide Google Forms based online registry covering over twenty administrative regions and more than twenty millions of population was designed and launched for DACPR performance and quality measurement at individual case level for non-traumatic OHCA patient. Audio records of individual EMS call were reviewed for performance rating.
Designs
System data inputted could be immediately retrieved as feedback to each corresponding administrative region. Recognition of cardiac arrest by call communication, CPR Instructions upon the recognised OHCA, and chest compression upon the recognised OHCA were the three major categorical performance indicators, and each operational time interval of call-to-recognition, call-to-instruction, and call-to-compression were evaluated. Each categorical performance indicator (Y axis) was paired with its operational time interval (X axis) as a set of quality index for diagrammatic comparison in our design. We used regression analysis for statistical analysis.
Results
A total of 5642 audio records for OHCA EMS calls across 17 regions were centralised into the nationwide DACPR Quality Registry in 6 months (minimal 40 to maximal 1622 cases/region according to its population). Regional recognition rate significantly varied from 10.0% to 65.5% (p<0.01; averaged 51.0%, SD 20.0%). Instruction rate varied from 41.3% to 95.0% (p<0.01; averaged 80.0%, SD 28.5%). Compression rate varied from 0% to 87.5% (p<0.01; averaged 54.0%, SD 23.6%). Averaged regional call-to-recognition time, call-to-instruction time, and call-to-compression time were 48 (SD 19), 84 (SD 42), and 185 (SD 114) seconds. The designated diagrammatic comparisons may indicate the administrative regions of better performance located at the upward and leftward dimension, and the ones of unsatisfied performance located at the downward and rightward dimension (diagrams will be illustrated).
Conclusion
We successfully innovated and launched a nationwide DACPR quality e-registry showing a wide variety of regional performance needing improvement. The designated diagram may easily indicate and compare the individual performance across the joint regions.
Conflict of interest
None
Funding
None
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer