It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH mut) gene have gained paramount importance for the prognosis of glioma patients. To date, reliable techniques for a preoperative evaluation of IDH genotype remain scarce. Therefore, we investigated the potential of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET radiomics using textural features combined with static and dynamic parameters of FET uptake for noninvasive prediction of IDH genotype. Prior to surgery, 84 patients with newly diagnosed and untreated gliomas underwent FET PET using a standard scanner (15 of 56 patients with IDH mut) or a dedicated high-resolution hybrid PET/MR scanner (11 of 28 patients with IDH mut). Static, dynamic and textural parameters of FET uptake in the tumor area were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy of the parameters was evaluated using the neuropathological result as reference. Additionally, FET PET and textural parameters were combined to further increase the diagnostic accuracy. The resulting models were validated using cross-validation. Independent of scanner type, the combination of standard PET parameters with textural features increased significantly diagnostic accuracy. The highest diagnostic accuracy of 93% for prediction of IDH genotype was achieved with the hybrid PET/MR scanner. Our findings suggest that the combination of conventional FET PET parameters with textural features provides important diagnostic information for the non-invasive prediction of the IDH genotype.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, −4, −5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
2 Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, −4, −5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
3 Dept. of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
4 Dept. of Neuropathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
5 Dept. of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
6 Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, −4, −5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
7 Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, −4, −5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
8 Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, −4, −5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
9 Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, −4, −5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany