ABSTRACT: Pre-irradiation technique was applied to graft acrylonitrile (AN) onto polyethylene film. The graft yield was optimised with respect to radiation dose, monomer concentration and reaction time. H2SO4 was added to the monomer solution to improve the graft yield. The highest graft yield obtained was 120% at 70 kGy radiation dose, 60% monomer concentration and 4 h reaction time using H2SO4 as additive. The AN grafted films were modified with hydroxyl amine hydrochloride to prepare amidoxime adsorbent. The prepared adsorbent was characterised by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The prepared amidoxime adsorbent showed high affinity towards Cr(VI) adsorption. Adsorption capacity was studied under different conditions: contact time, pH and initial metal ion concentration. The highest adsorption capacity obtained was 200 mg g-1 of adsorbent after 72 h contact time at pH 1.5 and initial metal ion concentration 200 ppm. Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations were used for interpretation of kinetic adsorption data. The equilibrium experimental data of Cr(VI) adsorption were also fitted with Langmuir isotherm model. Desorption and reuse of the adsorbent film was studied. The adsorbent showed no significant loss of adsorption capacity upon repeated use.
Keywords: Pre-irradiation technique, acrylonitrile, amidoxime adsorbent, Cr(VI) sorption, radiation induced grafting
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)
1. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, heavy metal pollution has become one of the most severe environmental problems and a great attention has been given to chromium because of its high toxicity to both the environment and living organisms.1-3 Various industries and manufacturing plants such as tanneries, paints and pigments, electroplating, metal processing, wood preservatives, textile, dye industry, steel fabrication and canning use chromium for various applications and discharge large quantity into the environment.4-6 In aquatic systems, chromium exists mainly as Cr(VI) and Cr(III) species which differ considerably in toxicity. Cr(III) species are considered an essential trace element for the metabolism in mammals. Conversely, Cr(VI) species are carcinogenic and extremely toxic.7,8 Moreover, Cr(VI) has a higher solubility and mobility than Cr(III) species increasing its dangerous effects. Chromium is non-biodegradable; it enters into the body through breathing, eating, drinking or skin contact of chromium and its compounds. The toxic effects of Cr(VI) include skin rashes, nose bleeding, respiratory tract infection, suppressed immune system, hepatic diseases and lung cancer.9,10 Hence, it is important to eliminate traces of chromium from drinking water, or to remove chromium from wastewaters before they are discharged into receiving bodies.
Several methods have been used for the removal of Cr(VI) from industrial wastewaters including ion-exchange, solventextraction, filtration and adsorption.11-14 Adsorption has been most widely used due to relatively low-cost, availability, ease of operation and efficiency in comparison with other conventional methods.15 For this purpose, many types of adsorbents have been investigated for the removal of chromium including activated carbon, biomaterials and nanomaterials.15-24
Recently, many researchers have focused attention on grafted polymers as alternative heavy metal adsorbent.25-35 "Grafting" is a method in which functional monomers are covalently bonded onto the backbone polymer chain. Graft polymerisation allows incorporation of various functions possessed by the grafted monomer to the parent polymer while maintaining the mechanical properties of the parent polymer.36,37 Among the different methods for initiating graft copolymerisation like ionising radiation, ultraviolet light, plasma treatment, decomposition of chemical initiators, oxidation of polymers, etc., radiation-induced grafting technique is advantageous because of its extensive penetration into the polymer matrix and its rapid and uniform formation of radicals.38
Polyethylene (PE) has been selected as the base polymer to prepare the adsorbent for its excellent mechanical and thermal property and low cost. A number of researchers have studied single or binary monomer grafted PE film for heavy metal ion adsorption.39-42 A polymeric adsorbent material based on PE was prepared by photo grafting of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) monomer on to a PE film and investigated for Cr(VI) removal.43 Composite particles were synthesised using titanium oxide attached to PE films by plasma techniques and used for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions in batch systems.44
Present study focuses on preparation of a new adsorbent by radiation induced grafting of acrylonitrile (AN) on PE films and its application in Cr(VI) removal. Pre-irradiation technique was employed in the grafting of AN on PE film. The graft yield was optimised with respect to radiation dose, monomer concentration and reaction time. H2SO4 was added to the monomer solution to improve the graft yield. The AN grafted films were modified with hydroxyl amine hydrochloride to prepare amidoxime adsorbent. The amidoxime adsorbent has been used to adsorb Cr(VI) ion from aqueous solution. Adsorption capacity was studied under different conditions: contact time, pH and initial metal ion concentration. Desorption and reuse of the adsorbent film was also investigated.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Materials and Reagents
PE films (thickness 0.04 mm) were collected from Chakbazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. These films were cut into small pieces (12 x 1.5 cm2), washed with methanol and dried in oven before use. Monomer acrylonitrile (BDH, UK) was used as received. Methanol, sodium carbonate, sulphuric acid, acetone and 1, 5-diphenylcarbazide were obtained from Merck, Germany. Hydroxyl amine hydrochloride was supplied by Sigma Aldrich, USA. Potassium dichromate (Techno Pharmchem, India) was used for metal adsorption study.
2.2 Instrument and Apparatus
The PE films were characterised by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) ATR spectrophotometer (8400S Shimadzu Japan) in the 700-4000 cm-1 range (resolution 4 cm-1, number of scans 20 times). 1H NMR spectra were measured at 25°C on Bruker Advance DPX 400 NMR instrument operating at 400 MHz in the Fourier transform mode (benzene was used as the solvent). The thermo gravimetric analysis was performed with TGA-50 (Shimadzu, Japan) from 25°C to 500°C with a heating rate of 10°C min-1, under nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate of 20 ml min-1. The dynamic mechanical properties of the adsorbent were studied from 25°C to 80°C at a heating rate of 4°C min-1 and an oscillating frequency of 1 Hz using dynamic mechanical analyser (DMA), Triton Technology TTDMA, UK. The metal-ion concentrations in the solutions were analysed spectrophotometrically (UV-2401PC, Shimadzu, Japan). The radiation source used for grafting experiment was Co-60 gamma ray. It is a 90 kCi Cobalt-60 Batch Type Panoramic Irradiator (Board of Radiation and Isotope Technology, BRIT, India). Activity was 68.63 kCi and dose rate was 13.7 kGy h-1.
2.3 Grafting of AN onto the PE Films by Gamma Radiation
The PE films were irradiated by gamma radiation from Co-60 source at different radiation doses (30 kGy, 50 kGy and 70 kGy) at ambient temperature. The irradiated PE films were stored in dry-ice temperature until use. The monomer solution was prepared by adding AN (20%, 40% and 60%) and H2SO4 (2% of AN) to methanol. The monomer solution was bubbled with nitrogen gas to remove dissolved oxygen. The de-aerated monomer solution was poured into glass bottle containing irradiated PE films. After completely filling the glass bottle with monomer solution, the bottle was tightly closed with a lid to prevent inclusion of oxygen from air into the monomer solution of bottle. After that the grafting reaction was carried out at 80°C in a water bath for different period of time (1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 4 h). The AN-g-PE fabric was washed with methanol to remove residual monomer and homopolymer of AN. The degree of grafting was calculated as follows:
... (1)
where, W1 is the dry weight of grafted PE film and W0 is the dry weight of PE film.
2.4 Amidoximation of Nitrile Group of AN Grafted PE Film
An 80 g l-1 aqueous solution of hydroxyl amine hydrochloride was prepared in distilled water by stirring with a glass rod and it was neutralised by adding sodium carbonate. The AN grafted PE (AN-g-PE) films were placed into the aqueous solution of hydroxyl amine hydrochloride and heated in water bath at 80°C for 4 h. The films were then washed three times with distilled water in order to remove the remaining salts and were dried in air. To study the effects of the reaction conditions on the conversion of the nitrile group to the amidoxime group, the reaction time was varied from 2 h to 4 h (2 h, 3 h and 4 h) with the concentration of NH2OH. HCl was varied from 4% to 16% (4%, 8% and 16%) and pH was varied from 5 to 9 (5, 7 and 9). The conversion of nitrile group of AN-g-PE film was calculated using the following equation:
... (2)
where W1 is the weight of the grafted PE film before the reaction, W2 is the weight of the grafted film after the reaction, M0 is the molecular weight of the acrylonitrile monomer (53 g mole-1) and M1 is the molecular weight of the hydroxyl amine (33 g mole-1).45
The preparation scheme of amidoxime adsorbent is shown in Figure 1.
2.5 Metal Ion Adsorption by Amidoximated PE film
The amidoximated PE films were soaked into the 50 ml aqueous solutions of Cr(VI) at room temperature (25°C). The adsorption process was carried out at different pH, contact time and initial metal ion concentration. The pH of the solutions was adjusted using HCl and NaOH solution. The metal-ion concentrations of the solutions before and after adsorption were analysed by UV spectrophotometer. The metal ion uptake capacity of the film was calculated as follows:
... (3)
where Q is the adsorption amount (mg g-1 of adsorbent), W the weight of the amidoximated PE film (g), V the volume of solution (l), and C1 and C2 are the concentrations (mg l-1) of metal ion before and after adsorption respectively.
2.6 Desorption of Metal Ions
The desorption of Cr(VI) ions from the adsorbent films were carried out by the treatment with 2 M aqueous solution of NaOH for 20 h. The percent desorption was calculated using the following equation:
... (4)
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Grafting of AN on PE Film
In the present study, pre-irradiation technique was employed for grafting of AN on PE film. In the pre-irradiation technique, the polymer backbone was first irradiated to form free radicals and the irradiated polymer substrate was then treated with the monomer as a solution in a suitable solvent. Since the monomer is not exposed to radiation in the pre-irradiation technique, the obvious advantage is that the method is relatively free from homo-polymer formation. In the present research, the graft yield was optimised with respect to monomer concentration and reaction time (Figure 2). It was observed that with the increase of the monomer concentration from 20% to 60%, the graft yield increased from 4% to 30% at 4 h reaction time. Thus, the increase in the monomer concentration improved the graft yield. It may be explained as following: with the increase of monomer concentration more monomer molecules can come in contact with the PE free radical to react and form AN-g-PE. Again, it was observed that the graft yield increased with the increase of the reaction time (1-4 h). The increase of the graft yield with respect to the reaction time is fast up to 3 h and then it became slow. The results indicated that 1 h reaction time is not sufficient for grafting of AN on PE and 4 h reaction time is enough for satisfactory grafting of AN on PE film.
To improve the graft yield of AN on PE film, H2SO4 (2% of AN) was added as additive to the monomer solution. Figure 3 shows the effect of addition of H2SO4 on graft yield. In this investigation, the monomer concentration was kept at 60% and radiation dose at 70 kGy. It was found that the addition of H2SO4 to the monomer solution largely improved the graft yield. The graft yield obtained with additive was 120% and without additive was 30% (at 4 h reaction time). It is documented that the addition of inorganic acids accelerates graft-copolymerisation in many systems.46 It is expected that the added sulphuric acid can give rise to the destruction of ordered arrangement of the molecules in crystalline domain of PE which accelerates the penetration of monomers for grafting into crystalline region accordingly.
Figure 4 represents the effect of radiation dose on graft yield of AN onto PE film. It was observed that with increasing radiation dose (30 kGy to 70 kGy), the graft yield increased. The graft yields obtained are 80%, 100% and 120% for 30 kGy, 50 kGy and 70 kGy radiation dose, respectively. The results suggest that with increase of radiation dose more free radicals are formed on PE film which may react with monomer.
3.2Conversion of Nitrile Group of AN
The AN-g-PE films were allowed to react with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to convert the nitrile group to amidoxime group. As shown in Table 1, the conversion of nitrile group of AN molecules increases along with the increase of reaction time at 80 g l-1 of hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution and pH 7. The conversion depends on the amount of hydroxylamine diffused from the reaction solution into the AN-g-PE films. Longer reaction times improved the molecular diffusion of hydroxylamine from the solution into the AN-g-PE films and increased the reaction probability between hydroxylamine and the nitrile groups. The increase of hydroxylamine hydrochloride concentration up to 80 g l-1 also promoted the molecular diffusion of hydroxylamine into the AN-g-PE films. The conversion of nitrile group of AN-g-PE to amidoxine group also depends on pH of hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution. Maximum conversion was achieved at pH 7. This could be attributed to the various chemical specifications of hydroxylamine hydrochloride in different pH conditions. NH2OH-HCl existed in the acid condition, which reduced the amount of free hydroxylamine. At pH 7, hydroxylamine hydrochloride in the solution predominantly existed in the form of free hydroxylamine molecules which accelerated the conversion of nitrile group. Although the alkaline condition caused the formation free hydroxylamine, the molecule would become unstable and volatile.
3.3 FTIR (ATR) Analysis of PE, AN-g-PE and Amidoxime-PE Films
Polyethylene may be considered as an infinite chain of CH2 groups, therefore the characteristic features of the IR spectrum of PE film (Figure 5) are its C-H stretching vibrations. C-H asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations are observed at 2916 cm-1 and 2848 cm-1 respectively. The spectrum for AN-g-PE exhibited a new peak (2245 cm-1) characteristic of nitrile group. After amidoximation of the nitrile group of AN-g-PE film the spectra show some changes. The peak corresponding to nitrile group (2245 cm-1) is markedly decreased due to the conversion of nitrile to amidoxime. In addition, the characteristic peaks of amidoxime can be observed at 916 cm-1 (assigned to N-O) and 1220 cm-1 (assigned to the bending vibration of the amine group N-H). Peak broadening occurred around 3736 cm-1 and 3020 cm-1 (assigned to O-H). These results indicate conversion of the nitrile group to the amidoxime group.45,47
3.4NMR Measurements
Figure 6 shows the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of PE, AN-gPE and amidoxime-PE. In the spectrum of PE the chemical shifts are as follow: 5 = 0.9 ppm, 5 =1.2 ppm and 5 = 4.2 ppm corresponding to alkyl(methyl), alkyl(methylene) and vinylic protons respectively. The chemical shifts at 5 = 7.2 ppm is due to the solvent (benzene) used. In the spectrum of AN-g-PE, the intensity of the signals for alkyl(methyl) and alkyl(methylene) protons decreased and vinylic protons disappeared due to radiation induced reaction of PE with AN. Again, in the spectrum of AN-g-PE the intensity of signal at 5 = 1.4 ppm increased which may be due to alkyl(methyne) protons. In the spectrum of amidoxime-PE, increase of intensity of the signal at 5 = 0.4 ppm may be due to the R-OH and R-NH2 protons.48
3.5TGA Analysis of PE, AN-g-PE and Amidoxime-PE Films
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) thermograms for PE film, AN-g-PE film and amidoxime-PE adsorbent are presented in Figure 7. The original PE film shows thermal stability up to 200°C and above 200°C it starts to decompose. It shows a three decomposition steps, i.e., 200°C-330°C, 330°C-410°C and above 410°C. The thermal stability of AN-g-PE film is higher than that of original PE film. The AN-g-PE fabric remains thermally stable up to 230°C. The TGA curve of the AN-g-PE fabric shows four decomposition processes at the range of 230°C280°C, 280°C-420°C, 420°C-450°C and above 450°C, due to the degradation of the grafted chain and that of the PE base polymer. There are four weight loss steps in the TGA curve for amidoxime-PE adsorbent. The first weight loss appearing in the temperature range 45°C-100°C is easily understood to be due to the loss of moisture absorbed from air. The weight loss stages at 100°C-210°C, 210°C-230°C and above 230°C originated from degradation of grafted chain and degradation of PE. The weight losses of PE film, AN-g-PE film and amidoxime-PE adsorbent at different temperatures are shown in Table 2.
3.6DMA of PE, AN-g-PE and Amidoxime-PE Films
Figure 8 reveals the storage modulus of PE, AN-g-PE and amidoxime-PE films with varying temperature. The initial value of storage modulus for AN-g-PE film is higher than that of PE film and amidoxime-PE film. It is observed that the glassy transition region for AN-g-PE film was obtained in the temperature range 49°C-50°C. On the other hand, the glassy transition region for PE film extends from 30°C to 56°C. Glass transition region for amidoxime-PE film was obtained in the temperature range 34°C-38°C. It is also found that there is a sharp decrease of modulus in glassy transition region for both AN-g-PE and amidoxime-PE but the PE curve shows a slow decrease of modulus in glassy region.
3.7Cr(VI) Adsorption by Amidoxime-PE Films
The amidoximated PE films were investigated for adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution (Figure 9). The effect of contact time on Cr(VI) adsorption were examined. The amidoxime-PE films were kept into the aqueous solutions of Cr(VI) with constant pH (pH 2.2) and initial metal ion concentration (100 ppm) at room temperature (25 °C). The concentrations of the Cr(VI) ions in solution were determined at regular times. The experimental data obtained are shown in Figure 10. It can be observed that the Cr(VI) adsorption rate is fast at the initial stage of the process, and gradually reaches plateau toward equilibrium with maximum adsorption of 75 mg g-1. The adsorption equilibrium for the adsorption of Cr(VI) ions was reached after 72 h.
The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second order kinetic models were applied to fit the Cr(VI) adsorption by the amidoxime-PE film. The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations are expressed as: 49,50
... (5)
... (6)
where Qt and Qe are the amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed (mg g-1) at any time and equilibrium time, respectively, k1 is the rate constant (1/h) of first-order adsorption and k2 (g h-1 mg-1) is the rate constant of second-order adsorption. The pseudofirst-order rate constants could be determined experimentally by plotting log (Qe - Qt) against t as shown in Figure 11. The experimental and theoretical Qe value, first-order rate constant and the correlation coefficients (R2) are given in Table 3. It can be seen from the results that the experimental Qe value and the Qe value calculated from first order kinetic model are not in agreement with each other. Pseudo-second-order rate constants could be determined experimentally by plotting t/Qt against t as shown in Figure 12. All the second-order kinetic parameters for Cr(VI) adsorption are also given in Table 3. It can be seen that the experimental Qe and the Qe values calculated from second-order kinetic model are in accordance with each other. Therefore, the pseudo-second-order equation can be used to interpret Cr(VI) adsorption on the amidoxime-PE film. Pseudo-secondorder model fit with the experimental kinetic data indicating that intra-particle diffusion process was the rate-limiting step of the adsorption and it also proves that the chelating interaction plays a major role in the adsorption process.51,52
It is well known that the pH of the medium has a great effect on the adsorption capacity of grafted adsorbent, because at different pH values, due to the protonation and deprotonation behaviours of acidic and basic groups, the surface structure of the adsorbent would be influenced and the metal ions would exist in different forms. The experimental results for the effects of pH on the adsorption of metal ions are shown in Figure 13. As observed, the adsorption capacity was highly dependent on the pH with maximum adsorption at pH = 1.5. The amount of Cr(VI) removal decreased with increasing pH of Cr(VI) solution. The variation of the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent at different pH values may be attributed to the affinities of the amidoxime-PE adsorbent for the different species of Cr(VI) that exist in acidic pH values namely H2CrO4, HCrO4-, CrO42- and Cr2O72-. At low pH value, the NH2 groups on the surface of the amidoxime-PE film are protonated to form NH3+ (positively charge) which easily bind to the negatively charged species due to the electronic attraction. At high pH value, the NH2 groups of the amidoxime-PE are de-protonated to form NH2...OH- which electrostatically repel the negatively charged Cr(VI) species and thus the adsorption decreases.
Figure 14 shows the relationship between the initial concentration of metal ions and the adsorption capacity. The figure shows that the adsorption amount of metal ions increased with increasing initial metal ion concentration then reached a plateau at higher concentration. This is due to the fact that the chelating sites of the adsorbent become saturated when the metal ion concentration increases. For interpretation of the Cr(VI) adsorption data, the Langmuir isotherm model is used. The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm model is presented by:
... (7)
where Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg l-1), Qo is the monolayer saturation adsorption capacity of the adsorbent (mg g-1), Qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity and b is the Langmuir adsorption constant (l mg-1). The plot of Ce/Qe versus Ce shown in Figure 15 was drawn from the experimental data given in Figure 14. The relationship between Ce/Qe and Ce is linear indicating that the adsorption behaviour follows the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. From the Langmuir equation the monolayer saturation adsorption capacity of the adsorbent was found to be 200 mg g-1. Cr(VI) adsorption capacity of amidoxime-PE film compared with some other adsorbents are shown in Table 4.
After adsorption of metal ions on the amidoxime-PE film, the adsorbents were regenerated using 2 M sodium hydroxide solution. Desorption equilibrium was achieved after 20 h. The desorption ratio was 99%. The sorption capacity of the film for Cr(VI) adsorption from aqueous solutions in five successive cycles is shown in Figure 16. The sorption capacity does not show significant change upon repeated use of the film for Cr(VI) adsorption.
4.CONCLUSION
Successful preparation of AN-g-PE films was conducted using pre-irradiation technique. H2SO4 as additive was found to increase the graft yield significantly. Highest graft yield obtained was 120% at 70 kGy radiation dose, 60% monomer concentration and 4 h reaction time using H2SO4 as additive. The AN grafted films were modified with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to prepare amidoxime adsorbent. The prepared adsorbent was characterised by FTIR, NMR, TGA and DMA. The prepared amidoxime adsorbent showed high affinity towards Cr(VI) adsorption. The highest adsorption capacity obtained was 200 mg/g after 72 h contact time at pH 1.5 and initial metal ion concentration 200 ppm. Kinetics and isotherm of Cr(VI) adsorption were studied. The experimental data for the adsorption of Cr(VI) on amidoxime adsorbent fitted with pseudo-second order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model. Desorption and reuse of the adsorbent film were also successful.
5.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are pleased to acknowledge the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for technical support to carry out the research. Authors also would like to thank the Gamma Source Division of Institute of Food and Radiation Biology, Atomic Energy Research Establishment for providing us the opportunity to use the irradiation facility.
Published online: 25 August 2018
To cite this article: Rahman, N. et al. (2018). Preparation of amidoxime adsorbent by radiation induced grafting of acrylonitrile on polyethylene film and its application in Cr(VI) removal. J. Phys. Sci., 29(2), 65-88, https://doi.org/10.21315/jps2018.29.2.5
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.21315/jps2018.29.2.5
6.REFERENCES
1. Adriano, D. C. (1986). Trace elements in the terrestrial environment. New York: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21510-5.
2. Afkhami, A. & Conway, B. E. (2002). Investigation of removal of Cr(VI), Mo(VI), W(VI), V(IV), and V(V) oxy-ions from industrial waste-waters by adsorption and electrosorption at high-area carbon cloth. J. Coll. Interf Sci., 251, 248-255, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.8157.
3. Cimino, G., Passerini, A. & Toscano, G. (2000). Removal of toxic cations and Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by hazelnut shell. Water Res., 34, 29552962, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00048-8.
4. Kanwal, F. et al. (2012). Batchwise removal of chromium (VI) by adsorption on novel synthesized polyaniline composites with various brans and isothermal modeling ofequilibrium data. J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 34, 1134-1139.
5. Nriagu, J. O. & Nieboer, E. (1988). Chromium in the natural and human environment. New York: Wiley.
6. Belay, A. A. (2010). Impacts of chromium from tannery effluent and evaluation of alternative treatment options. J. Environ. Protect., 1, 53-58, https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2010.11007.
7. Marques, M. J. et al. (2000). Chromium speciation in liquid matrices: A survey of the literature. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 367, 601-613, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160000422.
8. Sperling, M., Xu, S. & Welz, B. (1992). Determination of chromium(III) and chromium(VI) in water using flow injection on-line preconcentration with selective adsorption on activated alumina and flame atomic absorption spectrometric detection. Anal. Chem., 64, 3101-3108, https://doi.org/ 10.1021/ac00048a007.
9. Assem, L. & Zhu, H. (2007). Chromium general information. Cranfield: Institute of Environment and Health, Cranfield University.
10. Zhang, L. S. (2009). The advanced water treatment and reuse technology. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.
11. Cheng, C. J. et al. (2009). The effectiveness of ferrous iron and sodium dithionite for decreasing resin-extractable Cr(VI) in Cr(VI)-spiked alkaline soils. J. Hazard. Mater., 164, 510-516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2008.08.037.
12. Salazar, E. et al. (1992). Equilibrium and kinetics of the Cr(VI) extraction with Aliquat 336. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1516-1522, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00006a014.
13. Ahmed, M. T et al. (2006). Nanofiltration process applied to the tannery solutions. Desalin., 200, 419-420, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.354.
14. Ahn, C. K. et al. (2009). Removal of cationic heavy metal from aqueous solution by activated carbon impregnated with anionic surfactants. J. Hazard. Mater., 164, 1130-1136, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat.2008.09.036.
15. Park, S. J. & Jang, Y. S. (2002). Pore structure and surface properties of chemically modified activated carbons for adsorption mechanism and rate of Cr(VI). J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 249, 458-463, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2002.8269.
16. Schneider, R. M. et al. (2007). Adsorption of chromium ions in activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J., 132, 355-362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.01.031.
17. Hu, Z. et al. (2003). Chromium adsorption on high-performance activated carbons from aqueous solution. Sep. Purif. Technol., 31, 13-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00149-1.
18. Gupta, V. K. & Ali, I. (2013). Environmental water, advances in treatment, remediation and recycling. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Albadarin, A. B. et al. (2012). Influence of solution chemistry on Cr(VI) reduction and complexation onto date-pits/tea-waste biomaterials. J. Environ. Manage., 114, 190-201, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2012.09.017.
20. Park, D., Yun, Y. S. & Park, J. M. (2006). Mechanisms of the removal of hexavalent chromium by biomaterials or biomaterial-based activated carbons. J. Hazard. Mater, 137, 1254-1257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.007.
21. Saha, B. & Orvig, C. (2010). Biosorbents for hexavalent chromium elimination from industrial and municipal effluents. Coord. Chem. Rev., 254, 2959-2972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.06.005.
22. Hou, Y. et al. (2012). Combination of electroreduction with biosorption for enhancement for removal of hexavalent chromium. J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 385, 147-153, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjcis.2012.05.056.
23. Burks, T et al. (2013). Removal of chromium(VI) using surface modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Sep. Sci. Technol., 48, 12431251, https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2012.734364.
24. Ponder, S. M., Darab, J. G. & Mallouk, T E. (2000). Remediation of Cr(VI) and Pb(II) aqueous solutions using supported, nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 2564-2569, https://doi.org/10.1021/es9911420.
25. Coşkun, R. & Soykan, C. (2006). Lead(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by poly(ethylene terephthalate)-g-acrylamide. Fib. J. Polym. Res., 13, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-005-9000-3.
26. Băg, H. et al. (2000). Determination of zinc, cadium, cobalt and nickel by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after preconcentration by poly ethylene terephthalate/fibers grafted with methacrylic acid. Spectrochim. Acta B, 55, 1101-1108, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0584-8547(00)00162-2.
27. Bozkaya, O., Yiğitoğlu, M. & Arslan, M. (2012). Investigation on selective adsorption of Hg(II) ions using 4-vinyl pyridine grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 124, 1256-1264, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.35143.
28. Çoşkun, R., Soykan, C. & Saçak, M. (2006). Adsorption of copper(II), nickel(II) and cobalt(II) ions from aqueous solution by methacrylic acid/ acrylamide monomer mixture grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber. Sep. Purif Technol., 49, 107-114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2005. 09.002.
29. Coşkun, R., Soykan, C. & Saçak, M. (2006). Removal of some heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by adsorption using poly(ethylene terephthalate)-g-itaconic acid/acrylamide fiber. React. Funct. Polym., 66, 599-608, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2005.10.012.
30. Arslan, M. (2010). Preparation and use of amine-functionalized glycidyl methacrylate-g-poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers for removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution. Fiber Polym., 11, 325-330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-010-0325-0.
31. Yiğitoğlu, M. & Arslan, M. (2005). Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions using 4-vinyl pyridine grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers. Polym. Bull., 55, 259-268, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-005-0440-z.
32. Yiğitoğlu, M. & Arslan, M. (2009). Selective removal of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solutions including Cr(VI), Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions by 4-vinly pyridine/2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate monomer mixture grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber. J. Hazard. Mater., 166, 435-444, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.075.
33. Karakışla, M. (2003). The adsorption of Cu(II) ion from aqueous solution upon acrylic acid grafted poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 87, 1216-1220. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.n578.
34. Hamada, H., Razik, A. & Kenawy, E. R. (2012). Synthesis, characterization, and amidoximation of diaminomaleodinitrile-functionalized polyethylene terephthalate grafts for collecting heavy metals from wastewater. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 125, 1136-1145, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.34832.
35. Ping, X., Wangn, M. & Ge, X. (2011). Radiation induced graft copolymerization of n-butyl acrylate onto poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) films and thermal properties of the obtained graft copolymer. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 80, 632-637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.01.001.
36. Hsieh, L., Shinawatra, Y. M. & Castillo, M. D. (1986). Postirradiation polymerization of vinyl monomers on poly(ethylene terephthalate). J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 31, 509-519, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1986.070310218.
37. Abdel-Bary, E. M., Sarhan, A. A. & Abdel-Razik, H. H. (1986). Effect of graft copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on the properties of polyester fibers and fabric. J. Appl. Polym. Sci, 35, 439-448, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1988.070350211.
38. Nasef, M. M. (2000). Gamma radiation-induced graft copolymerization of styrene onto poly(ethylene terephthalate) films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 77, 1003-1012, https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20000801)77:5<1003: AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-K.
39. Hegazy, E. A. et al. (1999). Membranes prepared by radiation grafting of binary monomers for adsorption of heavy metals from industrial wastes. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 151, 386-392, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0168-583X(99)00125-1.
40. Hegazy, E. A. et al. (2001). Separation and extraction of some heavy and toxic metal ions from their wastes by grafted membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81, 849-860, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1504.
41. Hegazy, E. A. et al. (1999). Characterization and application of radiation grafted membranes in treatment of intermediate active waste. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 151, 393-398, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168583X(99)00107-X
42. Abd El-Rehim, H. A., Hegazy, E. A. & Ali, A. E. (2000). Selective removal of some heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using treated polyethyleneg-styrene /maleic anhydride membranes. React. Funct. Polym., 43, 105-116, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(99)00009-7.
43. Asamoto, H. et al. (2016). Use of polyethylene films photografted with 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate as a potential adsorbent for removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous medium. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 133, 43360, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43360.
44. García-Rosales, G. et al. (2014). Using plasma TiOx-polyethylene composites for removing Cr(VI). Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 32, 499-508, https://doi.org/10.1260/0263-6174.32.6.499.
45. Avila, M. et al. (2014). Surface functionalized nanofibers for the removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J., 245, 201-209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.034.
46. Bhattacharya, A. & Misra, B. N. (2004). Grafting: A versatile means to modify polymers Techniques, factors and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci., 29, 767-814, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.05.002.
47. Ramasamy R. (2015). Vibrational spectroscopic studies of imidazole. Arm. J. Phys., 8, 51-55.
48. Silverstein, R. M., Webster, F. X. & Kiemle, D. J. (2005). Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
49. Ho, Y. S. (2006). Review of second-order models for adsorption systems. J. Hazard. Mater., 136, 681-689, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.043.
50. Namasivayam, C. & Arasi, D. J. S. E. (1997). Removal of Congo red from wastewater by adsorption onto waste red mud. Chemosph., 34, 401-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(96)00385-2.
51. Rengaraj, S. et al. (2007). Adsorption characteristics of Cu(II) onto ion exchange resins 252H and 1500H: Kinetics, isotherms and error analysis. J. Hazard. Mater., 143, 469-477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2006.09.064.
52. Li, Y., Yue, Q. Y. & Gao, B. Y. (2010). Adsorption kinetics and desorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution onto humic acid. J. Hazard. Mater., 178, 455-461, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat.2010.01.103.
53. Yadav, S. K. & Dixit, A. K. (2016). Efficient removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution onto palm trunk charcoal: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Chem. Sci. J., 7, 1-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2150-3494.1000114.
54. Duranoğlu, D., Trochimczuk, A. W. & Bekera, U. (2012). Kinetics and thermodynamics of hexavalent chromium adsorption onto activated carbon derived from acrylonitrile-divinylbenzene copolymer. Chem. Eng. J., 187, 193-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.120.
55. Ali, A., Saeed, K. & Mabood, F. (2016). Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous medium using chemically modified banana peels as efficient lowcost adsorbent, Alexandr. Eng. J., 55, 2933-2942, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj. aej.2016.05.011.
56. Hu, X. J. et al. (2011). Adsorption of chromium (VI) by ethylenediaminemodified cross-linked magnetic chitosan resin: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Hazard. Mater., 185, 306-314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2010.09.034.
57. Kumar, A. S. K. et al. (2012). Effective adsorption of hexavalent chromium through a three center (3C) cooperative interaction with an ionic liquid and biopolymer. J. Hazard. Mater., 239-240, 213-224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2012.08.065.
58. Gode, F., Atalay, E. D. & Pehlivan, E. (2008). Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using modified red pine sawdust. J. Hazard. Mater., 152, 1201-1207, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat.2007.07.104.
59. Wang, J. et al. (2013). Polyacrylonitrile/polypyrrole core/shell nanofiber mat for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater., 244-245, 121-129, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat.2012.11.020.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Pre-irradiation technique was applied to graft acrylonitrile (AN) onto polyethylene film. The graft yield was optimised with respect to radiation dose, monomer concentration and reaction time. H2SO4 was added to the monomer solution to improve the graft yield. The highest graft yield obtained was 120% at 70 kGy radiation dose, 60% monomer concentration and 4 h reaction time using H2SO4 as additive. The AN grafted films were modified with hydroxyl amine hydrochloride to prepare amidoxime adsorbent. The prepared adsorbent was characterised by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The prepared amidoxime adsorbent showed high affinity towards Cr(VI) adsorption. Adsorption capacity was studied under different conditions: contact time, pH and initial metal ion concentration. The highest adsorption capacity obtained was 200 mg g-1 of adsorbent after 72 h contact time at pH 1.5 and initial metal ion concentration 200 ppm. Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations were used for interpretation of kinetic adsorption data. The equilibrium experimental data of Cr(VI) adsorption were also fitted with Langmuir isotherm model. Desorption and reuse of the adsorbent film was studied. The adsorbent showed no significant loss of adsorption capacity upon repeated use.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer