Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

We used the GEOS-Chem model and its adjoint to quantify Chinese non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions for the year 2007, using the tropospheric column concentrations of formaldehyde and glyoxal observed by the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2A (GOME-2A) instrument and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) as quantitative constraints. We conducted a series of inversion experiments using different combinations of satellite observations to explore their impacts on the top-down emission estimates. Our top-down estimates for Chinese annual total NMVOC emissions were 30.7 to 49.5 (average 41.9) Tg yr-1, including 16.4 to 23.6 (average 20.2) Tg yr-1 from anthropogenic sources, 12.2 to 22.8 (average 19.2) Tg yr-1 from biogenic sources, and 2.08 to 3.13 (average 2.48) Tg yr-1 from biomass burning. In comparison, the a priori estimate for Chinese annual total NMVOC emissions was 38.3 Tg yr-1, including 18.8 Tg yr-1 from anthropogenic sources, 17.3 Tg yr-1 from biogenic sources, and 2.27 Tg yr-1 from biomass burning. The simultaneous use of glyoxal and formaldehyde observations helped distinguish the NMVOC species from different sources and was essential in constraining anthropogenic emissions. Our four inversion experiments consistently showed that the Chinese anthropogenic emissions of NMVOC precursors of glyoxal were larger than the a priori estimates. Our top-down estimates for Chinese annual emission of anthropogenic aromatics (benzene, toluene, and xylene) ranged from 5.5 to 7.9 Tg yr-1, 2 % to 46 % larger than the estimate of the a priori emission inventory (5.4 Tg yr-1). Three out of our four inversion experiments indicated that the seasonal variation in Chinese NMVOC emissions was significantly stronger than indicated in the a priori inventory. Model simulations driven by the average of our top-down NMVOC emission estimates (which had a stronger seasonal variation than the a priori) showed that surface afternoon ozone concentrations over eastern China increased by 1–8 ppb in June and decreased by 1–10 ppb in December relative to the simulations using the a priori emissions and were in better agreement with measurements. We concluded that the satellite observations of formaldehyde and glyoxal together provided quantitative constraints on the emissions and source types of NMVOCs over China and improved our understanding on regional chemistry.

Details

Title
Adjoint inversion of Chinese non-methane volatile organic compound emissions using space-based observations of formaldehyde and glyoxal
Author
Hansen, Cao 1 ; Tzung-May Fu 1 ; Zhang, Lin 1 ; Henze, Daven K 2 ; Christopher Chan Miller 3 ; Lerot, Christophe 4 ; Gonzalo González Abad 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; De Smedt, Isabelle 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Zhang, Qiang 5 ; Michel van Roozendael 4 ; Hendrick, François 4 ; Chance, Kelly 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Li, Jie 6 ; Zheng, Junyu 7 ; Zhao, Yuanhong 1 

 Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China 
 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA 
 Atomic and Molecular Physics Division, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 
 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium 
 Center for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 
 Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 
 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China 
Pages
15017-15046
Publication year
2018
Publication date
2018
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
ISSN
16807316
e-ISSN
16807324
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2122234668
Copyright
© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.