It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Trade-offs and synergies in the supply of forest ecosystem services are common but the drivers of these relationships are poorly understood. To guide management that seeks to promote multiple services, we investigated the relationships between 12 stand-level forest attributes, including structure, composition, heterogeneity and plant diversity, plus 4 environmental factors, and proxies for 14 ecosystem services in 150 temperate forest plots. Our results show that forest attributes are the best predictors of most ecosystem services and are also good predictors of several synergies and trade-offs between services. Environmental factors also play an important role, mostly in combination with forest attributes. Our study suggests that managing forests to increase structural heterogeneity, maintain large trees, and canopy gaps would promote the supply of multiple ecosystem services. These results highlight the potential for forest management to encourage multifunctional forests and suggest that a coordinated landscape-scale strategy could help to mitigate trade-offs in human-dominated landscapes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details














1 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Ecology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
3 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBIK-F), Frankfurt, Germany
4 Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBIK-F), Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
5 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
6 Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
7 Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
8 Chair of Silviculture, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
9 Soil Ecology Department, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
10 Ecological Networks, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
11 Soil Ecology Department, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany
12 Environmental Informatics, Faculty of Geography, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
13 Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
14 UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Thuringian Forest, Schmiedefeld am Rennsteig, Germany
15 Geoecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
16 Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany
17 Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
18 Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany; Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
19 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
20 Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
21 Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany
22 Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa Ancón, Panama
23 Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
24 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBIK-F), Frankfurt, Germany