Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2018. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

The earthquake in Haiti, for example, has been described as an 'unmitigated disaster' in which nearly a quarter of a million people died - much higher than for quakes of similar magnitudes in other countries - yet the real death toll from disease, due to a systemic lack of adequate housing, healthcare and education, is much higher.24 In his analysis of violence Galtung explains that, Violence is that which increases the distance between the potential [for violence] and the actual [violence experienced], and that which impedes the decrease of this distance. [...]the case of people dying from earthquakes today would not warrant an analysis in terms of violence, but the day after tomorrow, when earthquakes may become avoidable, such deaths may be seen as the result of violence. Global Warming will break the foundation of a community without even shaking the penthouse suit so while the men and women who finance the earth's deterioration play the role of its savior sipping martinis in hybrid glass bottom boats tallying the brown bodies that float by this society's roots are sinking in quicksand (34-40) Here the hypocrisy of the words and policies of wealthy nations and corporations are succinctly pinpointed by contrasting their alleged role as environmental 'saviors' with the reality of their actions. [...]the term has a more complex history for indigenous people as a celebration of hybridity weakens bonds with place and amplifies the cultural, ethnic and racial mixing that has repeatedly been used as a weapon against indigenous people. Since 1928, Hawaiians have been legally defined by their percentage of blood quantum derived from their relatedness to the people residing in Hawai'i prior to 1778. In his discussion of indigenous opposition to hybridity, and the purpose of adopting strategically essentialist positions in questions of identity politics, historian Arif Dirlik notably argues that opposition to globalisation, in the form of indigenous nationalism, is necessary for creating the conditions whereby viable alternatives can be born.36 Using a framework of place versus space to theorise indigenous nationalism versus globalised flows of economic and social power, what could reasonably be called neo-colonialism, he argues that the opposition between place, a locally constructed geographical referent, and space, an international or supra-national construct of economic flows, is necessary to challenge notions of hybridity which have allowed the encroachment of the global into the local and the domination of place by space.37 Dirlik expressly names indigenous people as one of the groups whose identity is 'deconstructed' by hybrid re-renderings of the place/ space dichotomy, and reasserts the possibility that indigenous people's being-in-place offers a strategic alternative to hegemonic power structures, because 'they point to the re-conquest of space by place as an irreducible goal.'

Details

Title
Jamaica Osorio's Indigenous Poetics as a Challenge to Global Hybridity
Author
Scanlan, Emma 1 

 University of Sussex, UK 
Pages
1-16,A7
Publication year
2018
Publication date
May 2018
Publisher
Research Centre for Transcultural Creativity and Education (TRACE)
e-ISSN
18364845
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2138980679
Copyright
© 2018. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.