Scientific context and objectives
Understanding the distribution, sources, and sinks of trace elements and isotopes (TEIs) will improve our ability to understand past and present marine environments. Some TEIs are toxic (e.g. Hg), while others are essential micronutrients involved in many metabolic processes of marine organisms (e.g. Fe, Mn). The availability of TEIs therefore constrains the ocean carbon cycle and affects a range of other biogeochemical processes in the Earth system, whilst responding to and influencing global change (de Baar et al., 2005; Blain et al., 2007; Boyd et al., 2007; Pollard et al., 2007). Moreover, TEI interactions with the marine food web strongly depend on their physical (particulate/dissolved/colloidal/soluble) and chemical (organic and redox) forms. In addition, some TEIs are diagnostic in allowing the quantification of specific mechanisms in the marine environment that are challenging to measure directly. A few examples include (i) atmospheric deposition (e.g. , Al, Mn, Th isotopes, ; Baker et al., 2016; Hsieh et al., 2011; Measures and Brown, 1996); (ii) mixing rates of deep waters or shelf-to-open ocean (e.g. , , Ra isotopes, , ; van Beek et al., 2008; Casacuberta et al., 2016; Key et al., 2004); (iii) boundary exchange processes (e.g. , Jeandel et al., 2011; Lacan and Jeandel, 2001, 2005); and (iv) downward flux of organic carbon and/or remineralization in deep waters (e.g. , , ; Buesseler et al., 2004; Dehairs et al., 1997; Roca-Martí et al., 2016). In such settings, TEIs provide chemical constraints and allow the estimation of fluxes which was not possible before the development of their analyses. Finally, paleoceanographers are wholly dependent on the development of tracers, many of which are based on TEIs used as proxies, in order to reconstruct past environmental conditions (e.g. ocean productivity, patterns and rates of ocean circulation, ecosystem structures, ocean anoxia; Henderson, 2002). Such reconstruction efforts are essential to assess the processes involved in regulating the global climate system, and possible future climate change variability.
Despite all these major implications, the distribution, sources, sinks, and internal cycling of TEIs in the oceans are still largely unknown due to the lack of appropriate clean sampling approaches and insufficient sensitivity and selectivity of the analytical measurement techniques until recently. This last point has improved very quickly as significant improvements in the instrumental techniques now allow the measurements of concentrations, speciation (physical and chemical forms), and isotopic compositions for most of the elements of the periodic table which have been identified either as relevant tracers or key nutrients in the marine environment. These recent advances provide the marine geochemistry community with a significant opportunity to make substantial contributions to a better understanding of the marine environment.
In this general context, the aim of the international GEOTRACES programme is to characterize TEI distributions on a global scale, consisting of ocean sections, and regional process studies, using a multi-proxy approach. The GEOVIDE section is the French contribution to this global survey in the North Atlantic Ocean along the OVIDE section and in the Labrador Sea (Fig. 1) and complements a range of other international cruises in the North Atlantic. GEOVIDE leans on the knowledge gained by the OVIDE project during which the Portugal–Greenland section has been carried out biennially since 2002, gathering physical and biogeochemical data from the surface to the bottom (Mercier et al., 2015; Pérez et al., 2018).
Schematic diagram of the mean large-scale circulation adapted from Daniault et al. (2016) and Zunino et al. (2017). Bathymetry is plotted in color with color changes at 100 and 1000 m and every 1000 m below 1000 m. Black dots represent the Short station, yellow stars the Large ones, orange stars the XLarge ones, and red stars the Super ones. The main water masses are indicated: Denmark Strait Overflow Water (DSOW), Iceland–Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW), Labrador Sea Water (LSW), Mediterranean Water (MW), and lower North East Atlantic Deep Water (LNEADW).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Rationale for the GEOVIDE section
- i.
The North Atlantic Ocean plays a key role in mediating the climate of the Earth. It represents a key region of the Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) and a major sink of anthropogenic carbon (C) (Pérez et al., 2013; Sabine et al., 2004; Seager et al., 2002). Since 2002, the OVIDE project has contributed to the observation of both the circulation and water mass properties of the North Atlantic Ocean. Despite the importance of the MOC on global climate, it is still challenging to assess its strength within a reasonable uncertainty (Kanzow et al., 2010; Lherminier et al., 2010). The MOC strength estimated from in situ measurements on OVIDE cruises has thus helped to validate a time series for the amplitude of the MOC (based on altimetry and ARGO float array data) that exhibits a drop of Sv (95 % confidence interval) between 1993 and 2010 (Mercier et al., 2015), consistent with other modelling studies (Xu et al., 2013). This time series, along with the in situ data, shows a recovery of the MOC amplitude in 2014 at a value similar to those of the mid-1990s, confirming the importance of the decadal variability in the subpolar gyre. During OVIDE, the contributions of the most relevant currents, water masses, and biogeochemical provinces were localized and quantified. This knowledge was crucial for the establishment of the best strategy to sample TEIs in this specific region.
In addition to the OVIDE section, the Labrador Sea section offered a unique opportunity to complement the MOC estimate, to analyse the propagation of anomalies in temperature and salinity (Reverdin et al., 1994), and to study the distribution of TEIs along the boundary current of the subpolar gyre, coupling both observations and modelling.
Moreover, recent results provided evidence that uptake in the North Atlantic was reduced by the weakening of the MOC (Pérez et al., 2013). The most significant finding of this study was that the uptake of C occurred almost exclusively in the subtropical gyre, while natural uptake dominated in the subpolar gyre. In light of these new results, one issue to be addressed was the coupling between the C and the transport of water, with the aim to understand how the changes in the ventilation and in the circulation of water masses affect the C uptake and its storage capacity in the various identified provinces (Fröb et al., 2018).
Finally, as the subpolar North Atlantic forms the starting point for the global ocean conveyor belt, it is of particular interest to investigate how TEIs are transferred to the deep ocean through both ventilation and particle sinking, and how deep convection processes impact the TEI distributions in this key region.
- ii.
A better assessment of the factors that control organic production and export of carbon in the productive North Atlantic Ocean together with a better understanding of the role played by TEIs in these processes is research priorities. Pronounced phytoplankton blooms occur in the North Atlantic in spring in response to upwelling and water column destratification (Bury et al., 2001; Henson et al., 2009; Savidge et al., 1995). Such blooms are known to trigger substantial export of fast-sinking particles (Lampitt, 1985), and can represent a major removal mechanism for particulate organic carbon, macronutrients, and TEIs to the deep ocean.
- iii.
In the North Atlantic, TEI distributions are influenced by a variety of sources including, most importantly, the atmosphere and the margins (Iberian, Greenland, and Labrador margins).
-
Atmosphere. Atmospheric inputs (e.g. mineral dust, anthropogenic emission aerosols) are an important source of TEIs to the North Atlantic Ocean due to the combined effects of anthropogenic emissions from industrial/agricultural sources and mineral dust mobilized from the arid regions of North Africa (Duce et al., 2008; Jickells et al., 2005). Model and satellite data for the GEOVIDE section suggested that an approximately 10-fold decrease in the atmospheric concentrations of mineral dust was expected from south to north (Mahowald et al., 2005). As there had been relatively few aerosol TEI studies in the northern North Atlantic compared to the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic prior to GEOVIDE, constraining atmospheric deposition fluxes to this region had been identified as a research priority (de Leeuw et al., 2014). During the GEOVIDE campaign, a multi-proxy approach (e.g. aerosol trace element concentrations, dissolved and particulate Al and Mn, seawater , Fe, Nd, and Th isotopes, ) was taken to achieve the objective of better constraining the atmospheric deposition fluxes of key trace elements.
-
Margins. The continental shelves can act as a filter for TEIs supplied from shelf sediments, submarine groundwater discharge (including the discharge of fresh groundwater into the coastal seas and recirculation of seawater through the sediment), and rivers. While some TEIs are removed on the continental shelves, others are thought to be mobilized from the solid phase at the land–ocean interface (e.g. Fe and likely other micro- and macronutrients, such as Cu, Ni, Mn, and Si; Chase et al., 2005; Jeandel and Oelkers, 2015). The cruise track intersected several margins, thus allowing for the characterization of continental sources and quantification of TEI fluxes associated with these sources in various shelf regimes.
- iv.
It is obviously needed to further validate the use of paleoproxies. For example, in recent years, the potential of the ratio for identifying past rates of ocean circulation, and of the isotopic composition of neodymium () as a tracer of thermohaline circulation, has led to many paradigm-changing results for the reconstitution of the Atlantic Ocean circulation (McManus et al., 2004; Montero-Serrano et al., 2013; Negre et al., 2010). However, there is an ongoing debate about the interpretation of paleo-records in the Atlantic (Hayes et al., 2015; Keigwin and Boyle, 2008) focused on the effects of particle fluxes versus those of water circulation. Only one single profile in the subpolar North Atlantic was published before GEOVIDE (Moran et al., 2002). Regarding Nd isotopes, although several profiles of dissolved (and total) Nd isotopes are available in the boundary currents of Greenland and the Labrador Sea, there are very few profiles for the ocean interior of the GEOVIDE region (Copard et al., 2011; Filippova et al., 2017; Lacan and Jeandel, 2004; Lambelet et al., 2016). In addition, the importance of the interactions between the dissolved and the particulate phases in the control of the isotopic composition of Nd is becoming increasingly apparent. To the best of our knowledge, particulate data have not been published yet for the subpolar North Atlantic. For these reasons, documentation of these tracers in both dissolved and particulate phases is needed to provide new constraints and to significantly advance our understanding of the cycles of these tracers and their use in the modern and past oceans. Furthermore, proxies of nutrient utilization, such as the silicon stable isotopes () from diatom silica, provide a means of reconstructing the behaviour of past geochemical cycles and the past strength of the biological pump, and its influence on atmospheric concentrations of . However, successful application of in diatoms accumulating in sediments for the reconstruction of past silica cycling requires a thorough understanding of of dissolved Si () and of the processes that control its distribution throughout the modern ocean. Combining studies in the Southern Ocean (De La Rocha et al., 2011; Fripiat et al., 2011) and North and Equatorial Pacific (De La Rocha et al., 2000) with a global circulation model (Wischmeyer et al., 2003) has revealed the roles that ocean circulation and biogeochemical cycling play in controlling the distribution of silicon isotopes within the ocean. Largely missing from this dataset was the North Atlantic Ocean (De La Rocha et al., 2011).
Strategy
To achieve the objectives of the GEOVIDE project, a 47-day multidisciplinary cruise was carried out on board N/O Pourquoi Pas? in the North Atlantic Ocean along the OVIDE section, from Lisbon to Greenland, and in the Labrador Sea (Fig. 1). The Labrador section was chosen according to the OSNAP (Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Programme) recommendations because it transects the export route of the Labrador Sea Water downstream of its formation site. Therefore, the properties of the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) at 53 N are likely to be representative of NADW further south and a 15-year time series of currents and hydrographic properties is available in the western boundary current at this latitude (Fischer et al., 2010). The GEOVIDE cruise took place from 15 May to 30 June 2014, during the same season as the previous OVIDE cruises (2002–2012). The cruise timing helped to minimize seasonal variations and maximize the representativeness of inter-annual variability of the physical parameters investigated in this specific region. Furthermore, this period of the year corresponds to the bloom/post-bloom period of the subpolar gyre and post-bloom period in the subtropical gyre (Henson et al., 2009), thus allowing for the study of the complexity of the biological pump and the links between production, export of organic matter, and TEIs.
A high-resolution hydrographical section that includes the in situ measurements of the currents by doppler profilers was performed and, as recommended by GEOTRACES, a multi-proxy approach was used. In total, 78 stations were occupied (plus one test station). Station naming depended on the number of casts that were conducted: Short (47 one-cast stations), Large (17 three-cast stations), XLarge (5 five-cast stations), and Super (10 multi-cast stations). A total of 341 on-deck operations were carried out during GEOVIDE.
In total, (i) the standard stainless steel rosette was deployed 163 times, (ii) the trace metal clean rosette, 53 times, (iii) in situ pumps, 25 times, (iv) the mono-corer, with or without in situ pumps clamped on the cable, 11 times, and (v) the plankton net, 9 times. We also collected 140 surface seawater samples using a fish towed from the ship's starboard side and deployed at 1–2 m depth, 18 aerosol samples, and 10 rainwater samples. In addition, we deployed 60 eXpendable BathyThermographs (XBTs), 17 ARGO profiling floats (8 ARVOR, 2 ARVOR-deep, 2 PROVOR-DO, 2 PROVBIO, 1 ARVOR double DO, and 2 APEX), and 12 weather buoys.
Summary of the main results published in this special issue
In this special issue, 18 publications present results of the GEOVIDE project. Six other articles have already been published in other journals (Benetti et al., 2017; Cossa et al., 2018b; Le Reste et al., 2016; Pérez et al., 2018; Shelley et al., 2017; Zunino et al., 2015). Due to the long time required for some analyses, other articles related to this project are to be expected for publication at a later date.
The articles in this special issue are linked to four general research themes: (i) hydrographic and physical characteristics; (ii) links between water masses and TEIs; (iii) external sources and sinks of TEIs; and (iv) biogeochemical tracers of community structure, export, and remineralization.
Hydrographic and physical characteristics
In terms of circulation, the comparison with the 2002–2012 mean state shows a different repartition of the northward warm currents that compose the upper limb of the MOC, with a more intense Irminger Current (station 39–41) and a weaker North Atlantic Current (NAC) in the West European Basin, these anomalies being compatible with the variability previously observed along the OVIDE section in the 2000s (Zunino et al., 2017). The distribution of the volume transport in the three branches of the NAC (Fig. 1) has changed: no transport was found in the northern branch, although 11 Sv was found in the mean of the previous decade, and the central branch, which marks the limit between the subpolar and the subtropical regions, nearly doubled in 2014.
Section plots for (a) salinity, (b) potential temperature (C), (c) dissolved oxygen (mol kg), (d) nitrate nitrite (mol L), and (e) silicic acid (mol L) during the GEOVIDE cruise. Water masses are indicated in black, MW: Mediterranean Water; ENACW: North Atlantic Central Water; NEADW: North East Atlantic Deep Water; LSW: Labrador Sea Water; ISOW: Iceland–Scotland Overflow Water; SAIW: Subarctic Intermediate Water; IcSPMW: Iceland Subpolar Mode Water; IrSPMW: Irminger Subpolar Mode Water. Station locations are indicated by the numbers at the top of the panel. These plots were generated by Ocean Data View (Schlitzer, 2017).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The main hydrographic properties along the GEOVIDE section are shown in Fig. 2 for potential temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, nitrate nitrite, and silicic acid. The surface waters of the eastern SPNA, down to about 500 m, were much colder and fresher than the average values observed over 2002–2012 (Zunino et al., 2017). In the context of the ocean heat loss observed in the subpolar gyre since 2005, the year 2013–2014 was indeed particularly intense. Remarkably, despite the negative temperature anomalies in the surface waters, the heat transport across the OVIDE section estimated during GEOVIDE was the largest measured since 2002. This was attributed to the relatively strong MOC measured across the OVIDE section during GEOVIDE (Zunino et al., 2017) and more particularly to the strong transport of central water in the central and southern branch of the NAC (García-Ibáñez et al., 2018) that compensates the cold anomaly of the surface layer. The relatively strong MOC and heat transport were confirmed by Holliday et al. (2018) across a nearly simultaneous section (June–July 2014) between Labrador and Scotland.
The water mass properties of the GEOVIDE cruise were used to perform an extended Optimum MultiParameter (eOMP) analysis and to assess the water mass distribution (García-Ibáñez et al., 2018). The eOMP analysis together with the absolute geostrophic velocity field, determined using a box inverse model, allowed the evaluation of the relative importance of each water mass to the MOC. The increase in the MOC intensity from 2002–2010 to 2014 was shown to be related to the increase in the northward transport of the central waters in its upper limb (from the surface to 1000 m in the south-eastern part of the section), and in the southward flow of both the Subpolar Mode Water of the Irminger Basin (SPMW, 200 to 1500 m) and the Iceland–Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW, between 1800 and 3000 m) in its lower limb (García-Ibáñez et al., 2018).
In addition, the precise determination of different water masses (García-Ibáñez et al., 2018) and ventilation processes is crucial for the interpretation of the TEIs whose distributions are, for many of them, strongly related to water masses.
Section plots for (a) biogenic silica (BSi, mol L), (b) particulate organic carbon (POC, mol L), and (c) particulate organic nitrogen (PON, mol L), during the GEOVIDE cruise. Station locations are indicated by the numbers at the top of the panel. These plots were generated by Ocean Data View (Schlitzer, 2017).
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Links between water masses and TEIs
The concentrations of TEIs are strongly influenced by water mass distribution, age, and circulation/mixing. For instance, for the case of and , high concentrations of both tracers were observed in the old water of North East Atlantic Deep Water (NEADW), and low values in young waters, particularly in Denmark Strait Overflow Water (DSOW) (Deng et al., 2018). The low values of and in water near the seafloor of the Labrador and Irminger seas are related to the young waters present in those regions (Deng et al., 2018). This study reports a systematic increase of activities with water age but a more complex relationship between age and , which challenges some approaches to the use of sedimentary ratios to assess past rates of oceanic circulation. The application of this proxy at a basin scale to constrain the overturning circulation is, however, supported by GEOVIDE data, which now allows a complete nuclide budget for the North Atlantic to be constructed (Deng et al., 2018).
Long-lived artificial radionuclides were also very useful to assess the circulation in the SPNA, namely and , and the origin of water masses in a dual tracer approach (i.e. / and atom ratios) (Castrillejo et al., 2018). These transient tracers, originating from La Hague (France) and Sellafield (UK) nuclear reprocessing plants and the atmospheric nuclear weapon tests, helped investigating the shallow western boundary transport and the ventilation processes. For example, the concentrations validate the ISOW transport pathways in the West European Basin. The time series of in the Labrador Sea revealed two circulation loops of the Atlantic Waters carrying the signal from the European reprocessing plants: (i) a short loop through the Nordic seas into the central Labrador Sea of about 8–10 years; and (ii) a longer loop which includes about 8 additional years of recirculation in the Arctic Eurasian Basin before entering back into the Atlantic Ocean (Castrillejo et al., 2018).
Some other TEIs were also strongly linked to water mass distribution: within GEOVIDE, silicon isotopes (Sutton et al., 2018), lead (Pb) (Zurbrick et al., 2018), mercury (Hg) (Cossa et al., 2018a), and particulate and dissolved Fe and Al (Gourain et al., 2018; Menzel Barraqueta et al., 2018a; Tonnard et al., 2018), for example. For instance, the Labrador Sea Water (LSW) is characterized by a relatively high silicon stable isotope composition for dissolved silicon () whose signature can be seen not only in the region where it is formed, but also throughout the mid-depth zone of the North Atlantic Ocean (Sutton et al., 2018). The distribution thus provides information on the interaction between subpolar–polar water masses of northern and southern origin, and indicates the extent to which local signatures are influenced by source waters (Sutton et al., 2018). In LSW, the concentrations of Pb (Zurbrick et al., 2018) and Hg (Cossa et al., 2018a) provided evidence for a decrease in the anthropogenic inputs of these two elements over the last decade, since the values are lower in the recently formed LSW between Greenland and Newfoundland than in the older LSW of the West European Basin.
The Mediterranean Water (MW), meanwhile, was characterized by higher concentrations of trace metals, such as Pb, Hg, and Al (Cossa et al., 2018a; Menzel Barraqueta et al., 2018a; Zurbrick et al., 2018). It reflects the importance of Saharan and anthropogenic atmospheric inputs to the Mediterranean region, which are much higher than in our studied area (see below), as well as enhanced remineralization as indicated by the correlation between total mercury concentrations and the apparent oxygen utilization (Cossa et al., 2018a).
TEI sources and sinks
Different methods and TEIs were used to estimate atmospheric input fluxes: aerosol concentrations in aerosol and rainwater samples were compared with estimates derived from the measurement of beryllium-7 () in aerosols, rainwater, and seawater (Shelley et al., 2017). Taking a different approach, Menzel Barraqueta et al. (2018b) used dAl in the surface waters to estimate the atmospheric input flux. All these methods allowed conclusion that the atmospheric inputs of total trace elements were low in our study area, and the soluble input was even lower, based on their fractional solubility (Shelley et al., 2018).
One of the main sources of TEIs during GEOVIDE was sediment input (i) within the benthic nepheloid layers in the Iceland, Irminger and Labrador basins (Gourain et al., 2018), and (ii) above the Iberian, Greenland and Canadian margins, as well as fluvial and meteoric inputs (Benetti et al., 2017). This is notably the case for some dissolved TEIs, such as Fe (Tonnard et al., 2018), Al (Menzel Barraqueta et al., 2018a), and radium-226 () or barium (Ba) (Le Roy et al., 2018), as well as for particulate trace elements (Gourain et al., 2018). Overall, enhanced concentrations of TEIs close to the bottom suggest that continental shelves and margins acted as a source to adjacent waters. In the case of the Iberian margin, advection of particulate Fe (pFe) was visible over a distance of more than 250 km from the source (Gourain et al., 2018).
However, some results provide evidence that occasional removal of dFe or dAl by particles can be a dominant process rather than partial dissolution from resuspended sediments, but this is likely dependent on the nature of particles (Menzel Barraqueta et al., 2018a).
Additional sources for particulate elements and sinks for dissolved ones are biological uptake and scavenging. Evidence of a biogenic influence on the ratios within the Irminger and Labrador basins was found by Gourain et al. (2018). Almost all the stations displayed dFe minima in surface waters, in association with the chlorophyll maxima. The abundance of diatoms exerted a significant control on the surface concentrations of Fe and Al (Menzel Barraqueta et al., 2018b; Tonnard et al., 2018). Remineralization processes were also highlighted for some TEIs (see also Sect. 3.4). Dissolved Al concentrations generally increased with depth and the net release of dAl at depth during remineralization of sinking biogenic opal containing particles was generally larger than the net removal of dAl through scavenging.
Production, export, and remineralization
The main biogeochemical features of the GEOVIDE cruise in terms of biogenic silica (BSi), particulate organic carbon (POC), and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) are reported in Fig. 3 and the Supplement. The highest BSi concentrations were observed in the Irminger and Labrador seas. POC and PON were also high in these regions, but also show high values in the Iceland and West European basins.
On the Iberian margin and in the West European Basin, an unexpectedly high heterotrophic nitrogen fixation activity was reported, likely sustained by the availability of phytoplankton-derived organic matter (dissolved and/or particulate), resulting from the ongoing to post-spring bloom conditions, while dissolved iron supply relied on atmospheric deposition and surface waters' advection from the subtropical region and the shelf area (Fonseca-Batista et al., 2018).
In terms of particulate organic carbon (POC) export, thorium-234 () was used to provide estimates of POC export fluxes, with the highest values near the Iberian margin where a phytoplankton bloom was declining, and the lowest values in the Irminger Basin where the bloom was close to its maximum (Lemaitre et al., 2018a). The proxy was also used to assess the export of particles (Tang et al., 2018). The prominent role of small particles in sorption was confirmed, suggesting that particulate radionuclide activities and export of both small (1–53 m) and large (> 53 m) particles should be considered to account for the observed surface water disequilibria (Tang et al., 2018).
In the subpolar and subtropical regions, the mesopelagic POC remineralization fluxes, estimated from the particulate biogenic barium (excess barium; ) proxy, were found to be equal to and occasionally higher than the upper ocean POC export fluxes (Lemaitre et al., 2018b). These results highlighted the strong impact of the mesopelagic remineralization on the biological carbon pump with a very low carbon sequestration efficiency at the time of our study (Lemaitre et al., 2018b).
Conclusions
The main GEOVIDE results have helped to improve our understanding of the TEI cycles in the North Atlantic. The strong physical oceanography background of the GEOVIDE project is a strength for interpreting our data. For many TEIs, a strong link was observed between their distributions and water masses. On the other hand, TEIs also helped to constrain oceanic circulation, notably in the subpolar gyre and Labrador Sea. Important sources (sediments, fluvial, and meteoric) and sinks (biological uptake and scavenging) of TEIs were highlighted. The biological carbon pump was studied and showed different efficiencies in the various studied regions.
Data are available in the SEANOE database at 10.17882/54653 (Perez et al., 2018) and the LEFE CYBER
database at
The supplement related to this article is available online at:
GS and PL were PIs of the GEOVIDE project and the chief scientists of the GEOVIDE cruise. They wrote the article and prepared all figures, with contributions from all co-authors.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article is part of the special issue “GEOVIDE, an international GEOTRACES study along the OVIDE section in the North Atlantic and in the Labrador Sea (GA01)”. It is not associated with a conference.
Acknowledgements
We are greatly thankful to the captain, Gilles Ferrand, and crew of the N/O Pourquoi Pas? for their help during the GEOVIDE mission. This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-13-BS06-0014, ANR-12-PDOC-0025-01), the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS-LEFE-CYBER), the LabexMER (ANR-10-LABX-19), and Ifremer. Logistics were supported by DT-INSU and GENAVIR. Edited by: Laurent Bopp Reviewed by: two anonymous referees
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The GEOVIDE cruise, a collaborative project within the framework of the international GEOTRACES programme, was conducted along the French-led section in the North Atlantic Ocean (Section GA01), between 15 May and 30 June 2014. In this special issue (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



















1 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France
2 Ifremer, Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), IUEM, Plouzané, France
3 GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24148 Kiel, Germany
4 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, IIM-CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
5 LEGOS (Laboratoire d'Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales), Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, IRD, UPS, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
6 Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
7 Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH-Zurich, Otto Stern Weg 5, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland
8 Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH-Zurich, Otto Stern Weg 5, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland; Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals & Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
9 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; currently at: Laboratoire des cycles géochimiques, Géosciences Marines, Centre Ifremer Bretagne, Plouzané, France
10 Laboratório de Hidroquímica-IO/FURG, Rio Grande, Brazil
11 ISTerre, Université Grenoble Alpes, CS 40700, 38058 Grenoble, CEDEX 9, France
12 CNRS, INSU, Division Technique Bâtiment IPEV - Centre Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, CS 50074, 29280 Plouzané, France
13 Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
14 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK
15 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; Ifremer, Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), IUEM, Plouzané, France
16 LSCE/IPSL–CEA-CNRS-UVSQ–Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, F-91198 CEDEX, France
17 Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada
18 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, IIM-CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain; Uni Research Climate, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen 5008, Norway
19 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; Ocean Sciences Department, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK
20 IUEM, UMS 3113, CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest Iroise, rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France
21 Aix Marseille Université, CNRS/INSU, Université de Toulon, IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography UM 110, Marseille, France
22 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium; currently at: Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
23 Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals & Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain; School of Science, Edith Cowan University. 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia; Oceans Institute & Department of Physics, School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
24 GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24148 Kiel, Germany; currently at: Department of Earth Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa
25 LEGOS (Laboratoire d'Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales), Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, IRD, UPS, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France; currently at: Division of Marine Science, University of Southern Mississippi, 1020 Balch Blvd. Stennis Space Center, MS 39529, USA
26 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
27 Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UMS 3455, OSU Ecce-Terra, Paris Cedex 5, France
28 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; currently at: Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
29 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, USA; Earth and Environmental Sciences, the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, USA
30 Earth and Environmental Sciences, the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, USA; School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, USA
31 LEMAR (Laboratoire des Sciences de l'environnement marin), CNRS, Univ. Brest, IRD, Ifremer, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, 29280 Plouzané, France; Antarctic Climate and Ecosystem Cooperative Research Centre (ACE CRC), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 80, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia