It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Acheulean is the longest lasting cultural–technological tradition in human evolutionary history. However, considerable gaps remain in understanding the chronology and geographical distribution of Acheulean hominins. We present the first chronometrically dated Acheulean site from the Arabian Peninsula, a vast and poorly known region that forms more than half of Southwest Asia. Results show that Acheulean hominin occupation expanded along hydrological networks into the heart of Arabia from Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 7 until at least ~190 ka ̶ the youngest documented Acheulean in Southwest Asia. The site of Saffaqah features Acheulean technology, characterized by large flakes, handaxes and cleavers, similar to Acheulean assemblages in Africa. These findings reveal a climatically-mediated later Acheulean expansion into a poorly known region, amplifying the documented diversity of Middle Pleistocene hominin behaviour across the Old World and elaborating the terminal archaic landscape encountered by our species as they dispersed out of Africa.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany; Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; British Institute in Eastern Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
3 Department of Geosciences, Freiburg, Germany
4 Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Department of Geography, Kings College London, London, UK
6 Human Origins and Palaeoenvironments Research Group, Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, UK; Mansfield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany; Department of Geography Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK
8 Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany; Department of Geography, Kings College London, London, UK
9 School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Liverpool, UK
10 Saudi Commission for Tourism and National Heritage, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
11 Department of Archaeology, College of Archaeology and Tourism, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
12 Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany