Content area

Abstract

The Enron scandal offers the opportunity to assess the degree to which misleading accounting can affect connected firms and industry rivals. While the market was inept at detecting the inaccuracy of Enron's financial statements, it swiftly punished many connected firms once Enron's faulty accounting was publicized. A cross-sectional analysis documents that the market punished connected firms that had greater exposure to Enron's business, whose financial statements were viewed as more complex, and that had greater financial leverage. Most of the negative news indicating concern with Enron's accounting corresponded with a significant decline in the stock prices affirms in the energy and natural gas (ENG) industry, regardless of an explicit connection to Enron. Furthermore, rival firms with direct exposure to Enron and more aggressive earnings-reporting methods also experienced more detrimental effects. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Title
ACCOUNTING CONTAGION: THE CASE OF ENRON
Author
Akhigbe, Aigbe; Madura, Jeff; Martin, Anna D
Pages
187-202
Publication year
2005
Publication date
Summer 2005
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
10550925
e-ISSN
19389744
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
215578250
Copyright
Copyright Journal of Economics and Finance Summer 2005