Introduction
Nitrogen dioxide () is one of the major air pollutants and plays a key role in both tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry. It participates in the catalytic formation of tropospheric ozone () and also contributes to the formation of secondary aerosols and causes acid rain. High concentration is known to be toxic to humans. Nitrogen oxides (), defined as the sum of nitric oxide (NO) and , are released into the atmosphere from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Major sources of include fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning, lightning and oxidation of ammonia . In Hong Kong, vehicle emissions are the main source of . Similarly to many metropolitan areas, a decreasing trend in ambient and roadside levels has been observed , which was contributed to by the effective vehicular emission control measures in the past. However, the pollution levels measured at both ambient and roadside air quality monitoring stations have still occasionally exceeded the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline values of 40 g m (annual) and 200 g m (hourly) for , with more frequent exceedance of hourly with high values observed at roadside stations. A rising trend in the ratio with a reduction of is recorded at the roadside monitoring stations in Hong Kong, which means the reduction rate of is slower than NO in recent years . Vehicular is either primarily emitted at the tail pipe or secondarily formed from oxidation of NO emissions involving ozone and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at the ambient level . The increase in the ratio could either relate to the upgrades of vehicle engines and catalytic filters or changes at the composition and ambient level of VOCs. However, concentration changes rapidly with time and has a very strong spatio-temporal variability, which is often unknown in urban areas . Regular roadside air quality monitoring stations are not sufficient to capture these variations and could not provide an overview of the roadside pollution situation representative of Hong Kong. Therefore, it is necessary to take on-road mobile measurements for a better understanding of the pollutant distribution and spatial coverage of for the entire city.
In order to capture the spatial and temporal variability of concentrations in the central metropolitan area of Hong Kong, we use a combination of two different differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) techniques, a long-path DOAS (LP-DOAS) and a cavity-enhanced DOAS (CE-DOAS), as well as an ultraviolet (UV)-based dual-beam in situ ozone monitor (Model 205, 2B Technologies). CE-DOAS is a relatively new spectroscopic measurement technique, which uses an optical resonator to produce a long light path to enhance the absorption signal within a limited space . Sensitive measurements of trace gases have already been demonstrated by , , , , and . Compared to other in situ monitoring techniques, CE-DOAS is insensitive to other reactive nitrogen () in the atmosphere, making it a better option for small-scale measurements and detection of spatial variation of trace gases. Its high accuracy allows for fast sampling, which is important for mobile measurements.
Mobile measurements are an effective tool for obtaining the spatial and temporal variations of highly dynamic on-road pollutants. Therefore, it has been widely used for determining on-road vehicle emission factors and assessing the impacts of urban planning on air quality .
Map of Hong Kong city centre. (a) The standard measurement route; (b) the location of LP-DOAS. Yellow crosses indicate three roadside EPD monitoring stations while blue crosses represent four ambient EPD monitoring stations. The blue line indicated in panel (b) represents the optical path of the LP-DOAS.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Mobile CE-DOAS measurements of on-road were taken in December 2010 and March 2017. The mobile measurements were used to investigate the relationship between on-road and ambient air quality. In addition, LP-DOAS measurements were taken to investigate the temporal variation of general ambient in Hong Kong. Details of the mobile CE-DOAS and LP-DOAS experimental set-ups are presented in Sect. . In Sect. , the data filtering and normalization algorithms applied to the mobile measurement data are introduced. The mobile measurements are then analysed together with LP-DOAS and local monitoring station data for the long-term trends, and the results are shown in Sect. . Section presents an analysis of the characteristics of the weekend effect for different parts of the city. In addition, the spatial patterns of on-road and the identification of pollution hotspots are presented in Sect. .
Methodology
Mobile cavity-enhanced DOAS
A CE-DOAS instrument was employed for mobile measurements using a sampling inlet positioned on top of the front part of the vehicle at a height of about 1.5 m above ground. The measurements were taken in December 2010 and March 2017 and divided into two parts: (a) measurements along a standard route that cover a large part of the urban area of Hong Kong and (b) a single measurement in different areas that are not covered by the route. The regular route covers Mong Kok, Central and Causeway Bay, which are the busiest areas in Hong Kong (see Fig. ). The standard route measurements were taken 2 to 3 times per day in order to cover non-rush hours and morning and evening rush hours. The varying route measurements were mostly taken during non-rush hours, which aims to provide better spatial coverage and identify pollution hotspots. Measurements taken in 2010 focus more on the on-road spatial distribution and the identification of pollution hotspots. Therefore, the 2010 measurements include more non-standard routes in order to have better spatial coverage. On the other hand, the objectives of the 2017 measurements were refined to investigate the spatio-temporal variations over major pollution hotspots, which are mostly concentrated in the city centre. As a result, we focused more on the standard route measurements over the city centre in 2017.
The principle of the CE-DOAS is similar to that of the cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (CEAS) . The measured absorption spectrum of an incoherent broadband light source (e.g. LED) is used to determine the concentration of trace gases, which allows the application of the DOAS technique for the detection of multiple trace gases by a single instrument.
A schematic diagram of the CE-DOAS instrument is shown in Fig. . The CE-DOAS consists of a blue LED light source, an optical resonator with two highly reflective mirrors, a spectrometer and an air sampling system. Dielectric-coated highly reflective mirrors (reflectivity % at 440 nm) are placed at both ends of the sampling cell to form an optical resonator. Light from the high-power blue LED (CREE XR-E royal blue, 440–455 nm FWHM) is coupled to the optical resonator by a convex lens with a focal length of 25 mm. Light escaping from the other side of the optical resonator is coupled to an optical fibre with a numerical aperture of 0.22 by a convex lens with a focal length of 50 mm and an aluminum mirror. The transmitted light is redirected to the spectrometer for spectral analysis through the optical fibre. Spectra are recorded by an Avantes spectrometer (AvaSpec-ULSi2048L-USB2) with a Sony ILX511 charge-coupled device (CCD) detector. The spectral range of the spectrometer is adjusted to 395–492 nm with a spectral resolution of 0.47 nm (FWHM). The sampling cell is made by a Teflon pipe with a length of 50 cm and a sampling volume of 286.3 cm. The sample flow of the system is achieved by a direct current vacuum pump located at the outlet side of the sampling chamber. A Teflon filter is placed in front of the inlet of the sampling cavity to avoid aerosols entering the sampling cavity and affecting the optical path by scattering and contamination of the highly reflective mirrors. The time resolution of the CE-DOAS was adjusted to 4 s during the mobile measurement. The detection limit of the instrument is 1 ppbv. A more detailed description of the CE-DOAS instrument can be found in and .
Schematic diagram of the experimental set-up of the CE-DOAS.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
In this study, the software DOASIS was used for the CE-DOAS spectral evaluation. The CE-DOAS spectral fit is performed in the wavelengths from 435.6 to 455.1 nm, which includes several strong and water vapour absorption bands. Reference absorption cross sections of , , glyoxal (CHOCHO) and were included in the DOAS fitting.
Long-path DOAS observations
A light-emitting diode (LED)-based LP-DOAS system was installed on the rooftop of the City University of Hong Kong building, providing measurements of near-surface . The retro reflectors were placed on a high-rise building located at the centre of Kowloon, realizing an optical path of 1.9 km (total absorption path of 3.8 km). The spectral range of the spectrometer was adjusted from 400 to 462 nm with a spectral resolution of 0.4 nm (FWHM). The average altitude of the LP-DOAS light path is m above ground level, covering a long light path over the urban area of Hong Kong, providing a better overview of the spatial distribution of ambient level. Details of the experimental set-up and the data retrieval procedure of the LP-DOAS can be found in . When focusing on the spatial variations, we used ambient values measured by the LP-DOAS to normalize the temporal dependency of the mobile CE-DOAS measurements. Since the mobile measurements record data from different parts of the city at different times of the day, the diurnal variability has to be normalized in order to produce a concentration map that is representative of daily average concentration of . Details of the normalization procedure are presented in Sect. .
Local air quality monitoring network
Ambient data in Hong Kong were acquired from the air quality
monitoring network of Hong Kong which is operated by the Environmental
Protection Department (EPD). The air quality monitoring network comprises
13 ambient and 3 roadside monitoring stations (see
Fig. for the locations of some of the stations).
The ambient stations are located at different altitude and in general above
10 m a.g.l., while the roadside stations are measuring at 3 m a.g.l. The
measurements cover both urban and rural areas in Hong Kong. The
and concentrations are measured by in situ
chemiluminescence analyzer. Ultra-violet (UV) absorption
analyzer is used for monitoring. More details of
the air quality monitoring network can be found at
OMI satellite observations
The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) is a passive nadir-viewing satellite-borne imaging spectrometer on board the Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura satellite. The instrument consists of two CCDs covering a wavelength range from 264 to 504 nm. A scan provides measurements at 60 positions across the orbital track, covering a swath of approximately 2600 km. The spatial resolution of OMI varies from km (at nadir) to km (at both edges of the swath). The instrument scans along 14.5 sun-synchronous polar orbits per day, providing daily global coverage observations.
In this study, NASA's OMI standard product version 3 (SPv3) is used . The slant column densities (SCDs) of are derived from Earth's reflected spectra in the visible range (402–465 nm) using an iterative sequential algorithm . The OMI SCDs are converted to vertical column densities (VCDs) by using the concept of air mass factor (AMF) . The AMFs are calculated based on and temperature profiles derived from the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) chemistry transport model simulations with a horizontal resolution of 1 (latitude) 1.25 (longitude) . Separation of stratospheric and tropospheric columns is achieved by the local analysis of the stratospheric field over unpolluted areas .
Time series of concentration measured by LP-DOAS and EPD monitoring stations during the measurement campaign in 2010.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Results and discussion
measurement comparison
Our LP-DOAS measurements of atmospheric in Hong Kong started in December 2010. The data show significant diurnal, weekly and seasonal variability. The daytime annual average concentration measured by the LP-DOAS from 2011 to 2015 is 47.5 g m. A decreasing trend can be observed (see Sect. for more detailed discussion), but they are all still higher than the annual average of 40 g m in the WHO guideline (same standard as the Hong Kong air quality objective for ). Additionally, episodes of high levels are occasionally recorded, especially from long-range transportation of air pollutants from mainland China .
A time series of concentrations measured by LP-DOAS and EPD monitoring stations are shown in Fig. . On one hand, both LP-DOAS and EPD measurements show similar variation pattern with higher values during the daytime and lower values at night. On the other hand, LP-DOAS and different EPD stations measurements also demonstrate different characteristics of . The significant spatial dependency of is also confirmed in long-term changes (see Sect. for more detailed discussion). All measurements show an elevated level during the morning (08:00 to 10:00 UTC 8) and afternoon (17:00 to 19:00 UTC 8) rush hours. However, the absolute concentration measured by different stations varies in a wide range. In addition, differences in measurement height also contribute to differences in these measurements. In order to have a better overview of the spatial distribution, temporal variation and their emission source pattern, we took mobile measurements of on-road using a CE-DOAS instrument. On-road measurements can easily be influenced by the traffic condition, e.g. accumulation of emission during traffic congestion, and the diurnal variation of ambient . In order to correct for these effects in the mobile measurement, we have filtered data which are influenced by traffic condition and normalized the on-road measurement for diurnal variation of .
Data filtering and normalization
Comparison of concentrations during fluent traffic and traffic congestion
Traffic congestion can result in higher pollution levels due to accumulation of vehicle emissions, caused by less turbulent mixing with cleaner air and longer NO to reaction time. It has been observed that high concentrations of were recorded during low-speed driving in our measurements, i.e. in a traffic jam or waiting in front of a traffic light. Figure shows the time series of vehicle speed and measured concentration during a traffic congestion on 2 March 2017. Note that the vehicle speed is calculated from the GPS data with an error of about 0.6 m. Converting the error into vehicle speed would be 1.4 km h. Therefore, the vehicle speed is never zero, even if the vehicle stops. In the example shown in Fig. , the vehicle slowed down and stopped for half a minute at a traffic light. The level goes up from about 100 to more than 400 g m. The level rises about 8 s after the vehicle stopped. When the vehicle started moving again, the measured level gradually dropped back to the pre-stop level within 20 s.
In order to separate data that is influenced the spikes induced by traffic congestion or idling, we filtered data from 8 s after the vehicle speed drop below 5 km h to 20 s after the vehicle speed goes above 5 km h again. In order to avoid filtering data due to poor GPS signal, this filter only applies when the vehicle speed is below 5 km h for more than 8 s. The lag time shown in this case is 8 s. It is the combination of accumulation of at the ambient level and the lag time of the instrument. The lag time of the instrument is s, while the time of accumulation of varies with the ambient condition. The average concentrations for the standing condition are 239 g m, which is 14.5 % higher on average. We filter out traffic light or traffic jam stops only to have a consistent spatial distribution under fluent driving conditions for the direct comparison of measurements in different days and years, in order to focus on the concentrations instead of the congestion patterns. This filter criterion removed 37 % and 30 % of the total number of measurement data in 2010 and 2017. However, since the filter mainly removes measurements at low speed or standing, only 10 % and 11 % of the spatial points were removed for 2010 and 2017. This filter is only applied to generate maps for comparison.
Time series of the driving speed and the coinciding concentration during traffic congestion. Data in grey area will be filtered out in a later analysis.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Normalization of the diurnal cycle
In order to separate the spatial and temporal variability and show a representative spatial distribution of in Hong Kong, we developed an algorithm using LP-DOAS measurements to normalize the diurnal variations. Although the LP-DOAS measurement covers a long light path over the urban area in Hong Kong, the values provided might still not be representative of all measurement areas due to local influences. Therefore, we use a normalized long-term average of diurnal cycle for each weekday to correct for the temporal variation effect. The normalized data are less depending on outliers caused by the overpass pollution plume and can also interpolate data gaps due to instrumental problems and bad weather.
LP-DOAS measurements of atmospheric for each day are first normalized by dividing by the daily mean concentration. The resulting normalized levels are then averaged for each day of the week over a period of 2 years to obtain a representative diurnal variation pattern. The normalized and averaged diurnal variation pattern of the corresponding weekday are scaled and shifted to fit the normalized LP-DOAS measurement for each day during the mobile measurement campaign. The inverse of the 1 (standard deviation) variation of the 2-year averaged and normalized level is used as weighting in the least squares regression to scale and shift the long-term average diurnal pattern. In order to avoid single high values affecting the whole regression, the normalized level exceeded the 1 variation of the 2-year averaged, and the normalized level was not considered in the regression process. Figure shows the normalized concentration measured by the LP-DOAS on 17 December 2010. The normalized 2-year Friday mean diurnal pattern, the diurnal pattern of scaled measurement taken on 17 December 2010 and normalized EPD monitoring data are shown as well. All data illustrate similar characteristics with significant peaks in the morning (08:00 to 10:00 UTC 8) and evening (17:00 to 19:00 UTC 8) rush hours. Compared to the original LP-DOAS measurements, the fitted mean diurnal pattern matches better with measurements from most of the EPD monitoring stations, indicating that the fitted diurnal pattern better represents the general condition in Hong Kong. The fitted long-term diurnal pattern is then used to correct for the diurnal effect of the mobile measurement. Mobile measurements are multiplied by the simultaneous level of the resulting normalized LP-DOAS diurnal pattern to obtain a more representative value of the measurement areas.
Long-term trends of
On-road CE-DOAS measurements are analysed together with LP-DOAS and EPD monitors data to investigate the long-term trends in on-road and ambient . The observed trends at different locations are compared to the changes of the mobile on-road CE-DOAS measurements in 2010 and 2017 taken within 100 m radius of the 3 EPD roadside stations or within 1 km radius of the centre of the LP-DOAS measurement path (Fig. a, b, c and d), in order to illustrate the differences between on-road mobile and roadside stationary measurements and to examine the consistency of the long-term trend in roadside derived from stationary measurements. The time series represent monthly averaged ambient concentrations measured during the daytime. OMI satellite observations of monthly average tropospheric VCDs over Hong Kong are shown in Fig. e. The data were filtered for cloud fraction larger than 50 % and averaged for OMI pixel within 50 km of the measurement site. The on-road CE-DOAS measurements are in general much higher than the ambient monitoring station data. This is mainly due to the difference in measurement height. The inlet of our on-road mobile measurement platform was set up at 1.5 m a.g.l, while the EPD roadside stations were measured at 3 m a.g.l. and the ambient stations were located at even higher altitudes. As the tail pipes of vehicles are usually at 10–30 cm a.g.l., our mobile measurement inlet is much closer to the emission sources and therefore in general measures higher concentrations.
Normalized diurnal cycle of on Friday in Hong Kong in 2010 measured by the LP-DOAS and EPD monitoring stations. EPD measurements on 17 December 2010 from seven monitoring stations are indicated as a dashed line. The green curve represents LP-DOAS measurement, while the purple line is the 2-year averaged diurnal pattern with shaded area of the 1 standard deviation variation. The blue line shows the scaled and shifted diurnal pattern of ambient on Friday 17 December 2010.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Monthly averaged daytime concentration from January 2010 to March 2017 measured by three EPD stations and LP-DOAS. Red dots indicate the averaged concentration measured by the CE-DOAS within 100 m radius of (a) Mong Kok, (b) Causeway Bay and (c) Central roadside station. Panel (d) shows the CE-DOAS measurements within a 1 km radius of the centre of the LP-DOAS measurement path and monthly daytime averaged ambient levels observed by the LP-DOAS. Panel (e) shows the monthly averaged OMI tropospheric VCDs over Hong Kong. The reduction rates, Rr, indicated on the figures are calculated by taking the relative difference between averaged data taken in December 2010 and March 2017. The low reduction of LP-DOAS is due to sparse measurements in March 2017.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
On-road, ambient and satellite measurements of all show a decreasing trend. Ambient levels measured by the LP-DOAS show a descending trend with a rate of 2.5 % yr. Stronger decreasing trends of roadside are observed by EPD in Mong Kok, Causeway Bay and Central roadside station with annual decreasing rates of 4.4 %, 3.3 % and 4.8 %. A similar reduction rate is also observed by on-road CE-DOAS measurements. The CE-DOAS measurement taken in 2010 and 2017 are compared: on-road levels are reduced overall by 28 % for areas along the standard measurement route, which would correspond to an annual decreasing rate of 4.0 %. levels in 85 % of the measurement area are significant reduced ( ppbv) by 37 % on average, whereas levels in 14 % of the area are elevated ( ppbv) by 22 % on average. The reduction rate for on-road levels around the EPD roadside monitoring stations varies from 24 % to 54 %. This reduction change can also be observed from space by OMI satellite. Tropospheric VCDs show a descending trend with a rate of 3.7 % yr. In addition, Fig. a and b show tropospheric VCDs over the Pearl River delta from 1 November 2010 to 31 January 2011 and from 1 February to 31 April 2017. In general, tropospheric VCDs are reduced by % (7 % yr) over Hong Kong, while the reduction over Pearl River delta ranges from 30 % to 60 %.
Averaged OMI tropospheric VCDs over Pearl River delta (a) from 1 November 2010 to 31 January 2011 and (b) from 1 February 2017 to 31 April 2017.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Averaged on-road concentrations measured along the standard route during (a) December 2010 and (b) March 2017. Panel (c) shows the relative differences between 2010 and 2017. The markers indicate the location of metro stations. Measurements taken during morning rush hours, noontime and evening rush hours are weighted equally in the averaging.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Averaged on-road concentrations measured along the standard
route during December 2010 and March 2017 are shown in
Fig. a and b, the differences in
Fig. c. The measurement routes are slightly
different due to road constructions and maintenance. The two measurement
campaigns were carried out in winter and early spring. We have analysed the
meteorological parameters including temperature, humidity, wind speed and
wind direction taken during the two measurement campaigns. The results show
that the meteorological conditions are quite similar during the two
campaigns. In general, a significant reduction (ranging from 20 % to
50 %, and on average 4 % yr) of on-road can be
observed, which is consistent with the LP-DOAS and EPD monitoring data. The
reduction of the on-road level along Nathan Road, the busiest
road in Kowloon, is ranging from 50 % to 60 % (around 7 % to
8 % yr). On the other hand, an enhancement of the
level can be observed around subway stations, e.g. Hong Kong University
station, Kwun Tong station, Diamond Hill station, and Ngau Tau Kok station.
It probably reflects the fact that there are more bus terminals or bus stops
surrounding metro stations in 2017 compared to 2010. Data from the transport
department show that the total number of licensed franchised buses has
slightly increased by 3 % from 5729 in 2010 to 5916 in 2016
(
Monthly averaged ratio from EPD at (a) roadside stations and (b) ambient stations. concentrations measured by EPD at (c) roadside stations and (d) ambient stations are shown. Shadowed area indicates the 1 standard deviation variation of measurements.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Panel (a) shows the 5-year average diurnal cycle of of each day of the week was measured by LP-DOAS. The 7-year average diurnal cycle of of each day of the week measured by EPD at (b) Sham Shui Po station, (c) Mong Kok station and (d) Causeway Bay station.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
We have looked into the ratio as well as the concentration in order to better understand the impacts of reduction of vehicular emission of . An increasing trend in the ratio is observed from both roadside and ambient monitoring stations. Figure shows the ratio for (a) roadside and (b) ambient stations. Ozone concentrations from both (c) roadside and (d) ambient stations are shown for reference. Decreasing roadside level with an increasing ratio implies a significant reduction of primary NO emissions. The reduction of primary NO could be subjected to the upgraded catalytic converter of diesel vehicles (from Euro III or earlier models to Euro IV and V), which reduces the total emission and increases the ratio . Newer diesel engines in general reduce the total emission by % according to the European emission standards for diesel passenger cars . The Euro III diesel engine emissions limit of is 0.50 g km, whereas the Euro IV emissions limit has been reduced by half to 0.25 g km. However, this standard might not fully reflect the real driving condition and it should be confirmed by more realistic mobile measurements. Furthermore, observed a rising roadside ratio as well, coinciding with the introduction of new environmental friendly pre-Euro light- and heavy-duty vehicles in 2000 and 2003. also suggested that the proposal of replacing Euro II and III franchised buses to meet Euro IV or even higher emission standards will result in an increase in the roadside ratio. In addition, a general rising trend in ambient and roadside ozone is also observed from the EPD monitoring data. The increase in atmospheric with a large reduction of NO may be partly related to the recent increase in the ambient level, as less NO is available for the titration process under a heavy environment. However, it is difficult to quantify the contribution of an increase in ozone on the ratio. Discussion of the interaction between and is, however, beyond of the scope of the paper.
Mobile CE-DOAS measurement of on-road on (a) Monday (6 March 2017) and (b) Sunday (5 March 2017). Coinciding concentrations measured by the seven EPD stations are shown on the map as circle markers for reference. The colour scale of the EPD measurements is the same as the mobile measurements. Panel (c) shows the differences between Monday and Sunday. The markers indicate the location of major shopping malls.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Weekend effect
Figure a shows the 5-year average diurnal cycle of of each day of the week measured by LP-DOAS, and the 7-year average diurnal patterns measured by EPD Sham Shui Po, Mong Kok and Causeway Bay station are shown in Fig. b, c and d. The diurnal patterns of illustrate different characteristics between the weekdays and weekend. Different measurement locations also show different characteristics of during the weekend. The LP-DOAS measurement indicates that the concentration is on average 3.3 % lower on Saturday and 8.7 % lower on Sunday compared to the weekdays. However, the morning rush hour (08:00 to 10:00 UTC 8) peak of is significantly reduced by 23.1 % on Sunday, while the evening rush hour (18:00 to 20:00 UTC 8) peak shows a less-pronounced reduction of 9.7 %. measurements from the Sham Shui Po ambient station and the LP-DOAS show a similar diurnal variation pattern and weekend reduction. The weekend reduction is less pronounced for the roadside measurements in Mong Kok. The level is on average 3.8 % lower on Sunday compared to the weekdays, with reduction during the morning and evening rush hours of 13.1 % and 7.3 %, respectively. Similar weekend reductions are also observed by other EPD roadside stations, i.e. Causeway Bay and Central. These differences in the diurnal cycle are most likely due to different types of land use. Traffic emissions are the main source of in urban areas, which is strongly dependent on human activities. In residential areas, traffic is reduced during the weekend as most of the residents do not work on Sundays; e.g. the frequency of buses is reduced during the weekend. However, the traffic load is mostly unchanged in commercial areas, since shops are also open on Sundays.
In order to further investigate the relationship between residents'
activities during the weekdays and weekend and emissions, we
have looked into the morning standard route measurements on a sequential
Sunday and Monday in 2017. Two sequential days are used for comparison so as
to avoid influences from different meteorological conditions.
concentration maps measured on Sunday and Monday are shown in
Fig. a and b and their difference in c. Coinciding
concentration measured by the seven EPD stations is also shown
for reference. The level on Sunday is on average about 45 %
lower than that of Monday. The mobile measurements are in general agreement
with coinciding EPD data, while discrepancies can be observed for peak values
captured by the more frequently measuring CE-DOAS. This discrepancy is mainly
due to the difference in measurement time. Mobile measurements recorded the
instant concentration of on-road , which could easily be
influenced by a single incident – the on-road level varies
especially rapidly. On the other hand, EPD monitors provide hourly averaged
concentrations, which tend to average out those local pollution
peaks. Besides, four EPD ambient monitoring stations are located more than
15 m above ground level. Therefore, EPD ambient stations are expected to
measure lower concentrations compared to on-road CE-DOAS
measurements. In addition, concentrations of each location show
rapid changes, which are highly dependent on the traffic flow. However, a
consistent elevated level is observed over the most busy roads,
such as Nathan Road in Kowloon and western and eastern Cross-Harbor tunnels.
On Monday 85 % of the measurements show significantly higher ( ppbv) concentrations, whereas 13 % of the measurements
show significantly lower ( ppbv) concentrations on
Sunday. The spatial pattern of elevated level on Sunday
matches the location of large shopping malls. Similar difference maps are
observed between other workdays and Sunday. The number of licensed private
cars grows by % from 415 000 in 2010 to 536 000 in 2016,
while the public transport usage increases by % from
11.6 million times per day in 2010 to 12.6 million times per days in 2016
(
(a) Averaged spatial distribution of in Hong Kong measured by the mobile CE-DOAS in 2010. (b) Normalized spatial distribution of over Hong Kong measured by the mobile CE-DOAS in 2010. The CE-DOAS data are normalized using coinciding normalized LP-DOAS data. The black box indicates the area of the city centre used for the other maps. The standard route measurement was taken 3 times per day, while other locations only have a single or a few overpasses during the two campaigns.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Spatial distribution of in Hong Kong
In order to have a better overview of major pollution hotspots in Hong Kong, all measurements taken in 2010 were spatially averaged to a high-resolution grid of 20 m 20 m (Fig. a). These measurements covered most of the major roads in Hong Kong, including highway, urban, suburban and rural areas. As the spatial coverage of measurements taken in 2010 and 2017 is quite different and there is a general decreasing trend in , we only use data measured in 2010 for the spatial distribution analysis to avoid any bias toward lower values over the city centre. Elevated levels are mainly distributed over motorways and busy roads that always have high traffic intensity in the city centre, e.g. Route 8 and Route 9, Nathan Road in Kowloon, Queen's Road in Central, and Hennessy Road from Admiralty to Causeway Bay. About 29 % of the on-road measurements exceeded the WHO 1 h guideline value of 200 g m, while 27 % of the data measured in the city centre exceeded the guideline. High values over motorways are probably due to more heavy-duty vehicles. On the other hand, traffic congestion and street canyon effects are the major causes of elevated on-road in the city centre.
As described in Sect. , on-road pollutants mainly produced by vehicles and the traffic flow patterns also have a large impact on pollutant distributions . The diurnal dependency of the measurement times is corrected for using the simultaneous normalized LP-DOAS measurement. The normalized spatial distribution of on-road is shown in Fig. b. This normalized data set provides a better overview of the daily average. levels over some regions are significantly enhanced after applying the normalization, particularly, the residential area in Yuen Long district and Tung Chung district, where the Hong Kong International airport is located. Some other areas (mainly at the city centre and highways) obtained lower values after normalization. Enhancement of concentrations after normalization for certain areas is due to the fact that the mobile measurement took place during non-peak hours during the day, while a reduction of concentrations is due to the measurement vehicle overpassing the regions during rush hours of the day. Compared to unnormalized data, only 27 % of normalized on-road measurements exceeded the WHO 1 h guideline and about 20 % of the area in the city centre exceeded the guideline. The slightly decreased levels in both the whole of Hong Kong and just in the city centre are presumably due to the fact that the measurement campaigns are conducted during the daytime, when the level is in general higher compared to night-time.
Summary and conclusions
A high-resolution spatial distribution map of street-level makes identifying city pollution hotspots possible. It could meanwhile provide valuable information for urban planning as well as help with the development of pollution control measures. For obtaining the pollutant information, on-road mobile CE-DOAS measurements were successfully deployed in Hong Kong in December 2010 and March 2017, respectively. The diurnal dependency due to the different sampling times of mobile measurements was normalized through combining the continuous measurements of LP-DOAS. Furthermore, the algorithm, which was developed to separate and filter the accumulation of local emissions due to traffic congestion, helped us to focus on the concentrations instead of the stopping frequency during the comparison of the spatial distributions.
The long-term trend and spatial variations of ambient, roadside and on-road levels were investigated by analysing on-road CE-DOAS measurements together with LP-DOAS and EPD monitoring stations. The long-term trend analysis showed that the ambient level was descending with a rate of 2.5 % yr, while the roadside level showed a strong decreasing trend with an annual reduction rate ranging from 3.4 % to 4.9 %. This observation matched the mobile measurement results that on-road was in general reduced by 20 %–50 % between 2010 and 2017. The changes in the operational strategies of the major franchised bus company in Hong Kong could be revealed by the enhancements of level observed at locations close to metro stations. In addition, a rising trend in the ratio was observed in both roadside and ambient monitoring data. This was mainly subjected to the reduction of vehicle emissions, which were typically associated with the ratio. Increasing the concentration also contributed to the reduction of the level in the past few years in Hong Kong.
The temporal emissions, characteristic of different districts in Hong Kong, were investigated using mobile measurements taken on different days of the week. The weekend reduction rate of on-road measurements was much higher than the long-term ambient roadside observation of LP-DOAS and EPD monitoring stations. By analysing the spatial pattern of the weekend reduction effect, we found that the levels of most residential districts were reduced on Sunday, while commercial and shopping areas showed a rather constant level throughout the week. The mobile CE-DOAS measurements presented in this paper offered a full-scale observation of the on-road characteristics in Hong Kong. Simultaneously, these spatial distribution measurement results are also important for chemical transport model validations and assessment of effects on human health.
The mobile measurement data are available on request from the corresponding author ([email protected]).
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article is part of the special issue “Advances in cavity-based techniques for measurements of atmospheric aerosol and trace gases”. It is not associated with a conference.
Acknowledgements
The work described in this paper was jointly supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Programme des Projektbezogenen Personenaustauschs (PPP) (project ID: 57334317), the Germany/Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme sponsored by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong and the German Academic Exchange Service (reference no. G-CityU104/16), and the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (project no. CityU 11305817). We thank Annette Schütt, Teng Fei, Song Hao, Willy Ying for helping with the organization of the measurement campaign. Edited by: Katherine Manfred Reviewed by: two anonymous referees
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
In this paper we present an investigation of the spatial and temporal variability of street-level concentrations of
An overall descending trend from 2010 to 2017 could be observed, consistent with the observations of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and the Environment Protection Department (EPD) air quality monitoring network data. However, long-term difference maps show pronounced spatial structures with some areas, e.g. around subway stations, revealing an increasing trend. We could also show that the weekend effect, which for the most part of Hong Kong shows reduced
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Horbanski, Martin 4
; Pöhler, Denis 4
; Boll, Johannes 1 ; Lipkowitsch, Ivo 1 ; Ye, Sheng 1
; Wenig, Mark 1 1 Meteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
2 Meteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Remote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
3 School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Guy Carpenter Climate Change Centre, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4 Institute of Environmental Physics, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany





