It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
During earthquake propagation, geologic faults lose their strength, then strengthen as slip slows and stops. Many slip-weakening mechanisms are active in the upper-mid crust, but healing is not always well-explained. Here we show that the distinct structure and rate-dependent properties of amorphous nanopowder (not silica gel) formed by grinding of quartz can cause extreme strength loss at high slip rates. We propose a weakening and related strengthening mechanism that may act throughout the quartz-bearing continental crust. The action of two slip rate-dependent mechanisms offers a plausible explanation for the observed weakening: thermally-enhanced plasticity, and particulate flow aided by hydrodynamic lubrication. Rapid cooling of the particles causes rapid strengthening, and inter-particle bonds form at longer timescales. The timescales of these two processes correspond to the timescales of post-seismic healing observed in earthquakes. In natural faults, this nanopowder crystallizes to quartz over 10s–100s years, leaving veins which may be indistinguishable from common quartz veins.
Tectonic faults weaken during slip in order to accelerate and produce earthquakes. Here the authors show a mechanism for weakening faults through the transformation of quartz to amorphous nanoparticulate wear powders that lubricate friction experiments, and transform back to quartz under geologic conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 McGill University, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Montréal, Canada (GRID:grid.14709.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8649)
2 Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institute for Geology, Mineralogy, and Geophysics, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)
3 McGill University, Department of Chemistry, Montréal, Canada (GRID:grid.14709.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8649)
4 University College London, Rock and Ice Physics and UCL Seismological Laboratory, Earth Sciences Department, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
5 Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Geoscienze, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Tettonofisica e Sismologia, Roma, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064)
6 University of New Brunswick, Department of Earth Sciences, Fredericton, Canada (GRID:grid.266820.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0402 6152)
7 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Tettonofisica e Sismologia, Roma, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064)