Content area

Abstract

To investigate the extent to which online catalogs arrange together, or collocate, records representing particular au- thors and works, a survey compared the displays resulting from five author and five work queries in 18 online cata- logs. Dependent variables to measure collocation included the number of times irrelevant records were interfiled among relevant records. Searches for worst-case authors and works associated with large retrieval sets, including "Homer" and "Paradise Lost," revealed the effects of Boolean versus string matching, query type, and catalog size on the collocation of relevant records. Results of the survey showed that string matching collocated relevant re- cords more successfully than Boolean matching, that au- thor records were collocated more successfully than work records, and, surprisingly, that catalog size had only a small effect on collocation.

Details

10000008
Key topics
Powered by Web of Science® Description for Powered by Web of Science
Business indexing term
Company / organization
Title
Ordering Author and Work Records: An Evaluation of Collocation in Online Catalog Displays
Volume
47
Issue
7
First page
538
Number of pages
17
Publication year
1996
Publication date
Jul 1996
Publisher
Wiley Periodicals Inc.
Place of publication
New York
Country of publication
United States
ISSN
00028231
e-ISSN
10974571
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
en; English
Document type
statistics
ProQuest document ID
216901280
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ordering-author-work-records-evaluation/docview/216901280/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jul 1996
Last updated
2025-11-19
Database
ProQuest One Academic