Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2019. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of Quilty lesions in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) of cardiac transplantation patients. Methods: A total of 1190 EMBs from 117 cardiac transplantation patients were evaluated histologically for Quilty lesions, acute cellular rejection, and antibody-mediated rejection. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy was diagnosed by computed tomography coronary angiography. Clinical information, including the patients' survival was retrieved by a review of medical records. Results: Eighty-eight patients (75.2%) were diagnosed with Quilty lesions, which were significantly associated with acute cellular rejection, but not with acute cellular rejection > 2R or antibody-mediated rejection. In patients diagnosed with both Quilty lesions and acute cellular rejection, the time-to-onset of Quilty lesions from transplantation was longer than that of acute cellular rejections. We found a significant association between Quilty lesions and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. No significant relationship was found between Quilty lesions and the patients' survival. Conclusions: Quilty lesion may be an indicator of previous acute cellular rejection rather than a predictor for future acute cellular rejection.

Details

Title
Quilty Lesions in the Endomyocardial Biopsies after Heart Transplantation
Author
Cho, Haeyon 1 ; Choi, Jin-Oh 2 ; Jeon, Eun-Seok 2 ; Kim, Jung-Sun 1 

 Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics 
 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 
Pages
50-56
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Jan 2019
Publisher
Korean Society of Pathologists, Korean Society for Cytopathology
ISSN
23837837
e-ISSN
23837845
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2173863385
Copyright
© 2019. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.