Content area

Abstract

Years ago, most researchers believed that parametric statistics were generally more powerful than their nonparametric counterparts when the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were tenable. [...]despite any loss of power that may be experienced by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test, that test acquires a relative power advantage in outlierprone population distributions (Rasmussen, 1986; Zimmerman, 1994a, 1994b, 1996; Zimmerman & Zumbo, 1990). [...]those Monte Carlo simulations did not take into consideration (a) the situation in which the researcher uses a two-tailed decision rule or (b) the situation in which the researcher hypothesizes a one-tailed decision rule that is in the wrong direction. [...]when sample sizes were unequal the advantages of the nonparametric procedure in power, Type III error rates, and proportion of incorrect rejections were even more pronounced.

Details

Title
Power, type I, and type III error rates of parametric and nonparametric statistical tests
Author
MacDonald, Paul
Pages
367
Publication year
1999
Publication date
Summer 1999
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Inc.
ISSN
00220973
e-ISSN
19400683
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
217687283
Copyright
Copyright HELDREF PUBLICATIONS Summer 1999