It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction: Routine screening is an integral aspect of health care. The literature says little about how health-screening behaviors might be predicted based on trust, quality of care and communication within the professional–patient relationship—things that ultimately delimit attitudes towards routine screening.
Methods: This study employed data derived from the 2017 Health Information National Trends. Survey (HINTS). Bivariate relationships and two step-hierarchical multiple regression techniques were used to examine associations between routine screening behavior and sociodemographic factors, and to identify any mediating role in such associations played by one or more health-care factors.
Results: Native English speakers were significantly more likely than less-fluent non-native speakers to perceive the quality of care received to be high, [p < .001, d = .45] communication to be better [p = .01, d = .32) and trusted more [p = .02, d = .14). health-care factors trust (b = .105, p = .000) and quality (b = .061, p = .028) were associated significantly with routine screening behavior, while communication (b = .046, p = .192) was not. At Step 2, explained variance increased by 2%, adding health-care factors raised the measure of F-value significantly.
Discussion: The small variance implies the need to seek further relevant correlates of routine screening behavior. As health-care systems continue turning toward preventive strategies, grasping the social determinants of preventive screening behavior could prove useful for improving the health of the nation’s residents. Also, cultural understanding by health professionals is pertinent and required to capitalize on immigrant groups’ health-care-seeking behaviors and facilitate competent delivery of care.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Health Studies, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, TX, USA
2 Epidemiologist and Data analyst, Cook Children’s Health Network, Fort wort, Texas
3 Department of Sociology, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, TX, USA