It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Conservation requires rapid action to be effective, which is often difficult because of funding limitations, political constraints, and limited data. Turtles are among the world’s most endangered vertebrate taxa, with almost half of 356 species threatened with extinction. In Australia’s Murray River, nest predation by invasive foxes (Vulpes vulpes) was predicted to drive turtle declines in the 1980s. We assessed populations of the broad-shelled turtle (Chelodina expansa), eastern long-necked turtle (C. longicollis), and Murray River turtle (Emydura macquarii) in the Murray River and some of its associated waterways. Our results suggest that the predicted decline is occurring. All three species are rare in the lower Murray River region, and were undetected in many locations in South Australia. Moreover, E. macquarii had considerable population aging almost everywhere, possibly due to comprehensive nest destruction by foxes. Chelodina longicollis also had population aging at some sites. Sustained low recruitment has potential to lead to collapses as turtles age, which is particularly worrying because it was predicted over 30 years ago and may have already occurred in South Australia. Our results show that turtle declines were not mitigated since that prediction. If the crash continues, a vertebrate guild responsible for considerable nutrient cycling in the aquatic ecosystem will disappear. Our results highlight a worst-case outcome when species declines are predicted, but insufficiently mitigated.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, School of Science and Health, Penrith, Australia (GRID:grid.1029.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 9939 5719); Institute for Land, Water, and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury-Wodonga Campus, School of Environmental Sciences, Albury, Australia (GRID:grid.1037.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 0777)
2 Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, School of Science and Health, Penrith, Australia (GRID:grid.1029.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 9939 5719)
3 Heydon-Laurence Building (A08), University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X)
4 University of New South Wales, Centre for Ecosystem Science, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
5 University of Canberra, Institute for Applied Ecology, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1039.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0385 7472)




