It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Major hydrocarbon accumulations occur in traps associated with salt domes. Whereas some of these hydrocarbons remain to be extracted for economic use, significant amounts have degraded in the subsurface, yielding mineral precipitates as byproducts. Salt domes of the Gulf of Mexico Basin typically exhibit extensive deposits of carbonate that form as cap rock atop salt structures. Despite previous efforts to model cap rock formation, the details of subsurface reactions (including the role of microorganisms) remain largely unknown. Here we show that cap rock mineral precipitation occurred via closed-system sulfate reduction, as indicated by new sulfur isotope data. 13C-depleted carbonate carbon isotope compositions and low clumped isotope-derived carbonate formation temperatures indicate that microbial, sulfate-dependent, anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) contributed to carbonate formation. These findings suggest that AOM serves as an unrecognized methane sink that reduces methane emissions in salt dome settings perhaps associated with an extensive, deep subsurface biosphere.
The nature of the microbial reactions occurring during cap rock formation is poorly understood. Here the authors find that sulfur and carbon isotope signatures indicate sulfate-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) as a primary driver of cap rock carbonate formation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 California State University, Fullerton, Department of Geological Sciences, Fullerton, USA (GRID:grid.253559.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8158)
2 University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
3 University of California, Riverside, Department of Earth Sciences, Riverside, USA (GRID:grid.266097.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 1582)
4 University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Earth, Space and Planetary Sciences, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718)