It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Response of dielectric crystals: MgO, Al2O3 and Y3Al5O12 (YAG) to irradiation with 167 MeV Xe ions decelerating in the electronic stopping regime is studied. Comprehensive simulations demonstrated that despite similar ion energy losses and the initial excitation kinetics of the electronic systems and lattices, significant differences occur among final structures of ion tracks in these materials, supported by experiments. No ion tracks appeared in MgO, whereas discontinuous distorted crystalline tracks of ~2 nm in diameter were observed in Al2O3 and continuous amorphous tracks were detected in YAG. These track structures in Al2O3 and YAG were confirmed by high resolution TEM data. The simulations enabled us to identify recrystallization as the dominant mechanism governing formation of detected tracks in these oxides. We analyzed effects of the viscosity in molten state, lattice structure and difference in the kinetics of metallic and oxygen sublattices at the crystallization surface on damage recovery in tracks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia (GRID:grid.33762.33) (ISNI:0000000406204119); The Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty, Kazakhstan (GRID:grid.443884.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0601 3582); L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan (GRID:grid.55380.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0398 5415)
2 Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 8, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.424881.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0634 148X); Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 8, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.425087.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0369 3957)
3 Nelson Mandela University, University way, Summerstrand, Port Elizabeth, South Africa (GRID:grid.412139.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 3608)
4 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia (GRID:grid.33762.33) (ISNI:0000000406204119); National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.183446.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 8868 5198); Dubna State University, Universitetskay 19, Dubna, Russia (GRID:grid.440621.5)
5 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia (GRID:grid.33762.33) (ISNI:0000000406204119); National Research Center ‘Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.18919.38) (ISNI:0000000406204151); Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.425806.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0656 6476); National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.35043.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0010 3972)