It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical tachyarrhythmia with a strong tendency to progress in time. AF progression is driven by derailment of protein homeostasis, which ultimately causes contractile dysfunction of the atria. Here we report that tachypacing-induced functional loss of atrial cardiomyocytes is precipitated by excessive poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) activation in response to oxidative DNA damage. PARP1-mediated synthesis of ADP-ribose chains in turn depletes nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), induces further DNA damage and contractile dysfunction. Accordingly, NAD+ replenishment or PARP1 depletion precludes functional loss. Moreover, inhibition of PARP1 protects against tachypacing-induced NAD+ depletion, oxidative stress, DNA damage and contractile dysfunction in atrial cardiomyocytes and Drosophila. Consistently, cardiomyocytes of persistent AF patients show significant DNA damage, which correlates with PARP1 activity. The findings uncover a mechanism by which tachypacing impairs cardiomyocyte function and implicates PARP1 as a possible therapeutic target that may preserve cardiomyocyte function in clinical AF.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by a detrimental loss of functional cardiomyocytes. Here, Zhang et al. show that AF-induced cardiomyocyte dysfunction is a consequence of DNA damage-mediated PARP1 activation, which leads to depletion of NAD+ and further oxidative stress and DNA damage, and identify PARP1 inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of AF.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Physiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.12380.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1754 9227)
2 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Leiden, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10419.3d) (ISNI:0000000089452978)
3 University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.12380.38)
4 Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5645.2) (ISNI:000000040459992X)
5 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4494.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9558 4598)
6 University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5645.2)




