It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The dysregulation of Fbxo4-cyclin D1 axis occurs at high frequency in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), where it promotes ESCC development and progression. However, defining a therapeutic vulnerability that results from this dysregulation has remained elusive. Here we demonstrate that Rb and mTORC1 contribute to Gln-addiction upon the dysregulation of the Fbxo4-cyclin D1 axis, which leads to the reprogramming of cellular metabolism. This reprogramming is characterized by reduced energy production and increased sensitivity of ESCC cells to combined treatment with CB-839 (glutaminase 1 inhibitor) plus metformin/phenformin. Of additional importance, this combined treatment has potent efficacy in ESCC cells with acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in vitro and in xenograft tumors. Our findings reveal a molecular basis for cancer therapy through targeting glutaminolysis and mitochondrial respiration in ESCC with dysregulated Fbxo4-cyclin D1 axis as well as cancers resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
A subset of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma harbors dysregulated Fbxo4- cyclin D1 axis. Here, the authors show that the dysregulation of Fbxo4-cyclin D1 leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and glutamine addiction rendering these tumors susceptible to metabolic inhibitors even when resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, USA (GRID:grid.259828.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2189 3475)
2 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, Charleston, USA (GRID:grid.259828.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2189 3475)
3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.65499.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2106 9910); Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
4 University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Genetics, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)