It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Nonlinear spectroscopies are utilized extensively for selective measurements of chemical dynamics in the optical, infrared, and radio-frequency regimes. The development of these techniques for extreme ultraviolet (XUV) light sources facilitates measurements of electronic dynamics on attosecond timescales. Here, we elucidate the temporal dynamics of nonlinear signal generation by utilizing a transient grating scheme with a subfemtosecond XUV pulse train and two few-cycle near-infrared pulses in atomic helium. Simultaneous detection of multiple diffraction orders reveals delays of ≥1.5 fs in higher-order XUV signal generation, which are reproduced theoretically by solving the coupled Maxwell–Schrödinger equations and with a phase grating model. The delays result in measurable order-dependent differences in the energies of transient light induced states. As nonlinear methods are extended into the attosecond regime, the observed higher-order signal generation delays will significantly impact and aid temporal and spectral measurements of dynamic processes.
Ultrafast dynamics following light-matter interaction are governed by nonlinear processes. Here the authors show that initial nonlinear signal time-evolution is a consequence of phase grating accumulation using transient grating measurements with attosecond and near-infrared pulses.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551); University of California, Berkeley, Department of Chemistry, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 Louisiana State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baton Rouge, USA (GRID:grid.64337.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 7451)
3 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
4 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551); University of California, Berkeley, Department of Chemistry, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Berkeley, Department of Physics, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)