It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Fusion or merging or pansharpening is the digital processing that combines the high spatial and multispectral information to obtain a fused multispectral image that retains the spatial information from the high resolution panchromatic image, as well as the spectral characteristics of the lower resolution multispectral image. Many fusion algorithms were developed and tested on different commercial satellite data such as Ikonos and Quickbird, however, the efficacy of these algorithms is weakly assessed on the new satellite images of Worldview-2 with very high spatial resolution. In the present study ten well known fusion techniques namely Color Normalized (CN), Ehlers, Gram-Schmidt, High Pass Filter (HPF), Local Mean Matching (LMM), Local Mean and Variance Matching (LMVM), Modified IHS (Modihs), Pansharp, PCA and Wavelet are used for the fusion of Worldview-2 panchromatic and multispectral data. Fused images were evaluated for spectral and spatial fidelity using visual inspection and different quality indexes such as the correlation coefficient (CC), ERGAS, the Universal Image Quality Index (Q), the Expanded Quality Index (Q4expand) and the Entropy values. Under each quality metric the fusion algorithms were ranked and best performances were indentified. It has been proved that all fusion algorithms have a different performance with the new multispectral bands of Worldview-2 in comparison to the classical ones. It has also been proved that almost all quality indices present a very strong dependency to the spatial resolution of the input data. The Q4expand quality index is proposed as the main quality discriminator since it gave the most robust results independently of the spectral and spatial input resolution. Pansharp algorithm took the lead in spatial enhancement while Ehlers and HPF are ranked in the first places for spectral preservation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Geology, University of Patras, University Campus, 26504 Rio, Greece
2 Department of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki Greece