Content area
Full Text
Abstract: The goal of this work is to analyze the role of digital literacy in citizens' adoption of electronic public services. The study is driven by the following puzzle: notwithstanding intense policy efforts over the past two decades to secure universal supply of information technologies (IT) at the school level, as well as universal broadband coverage at low cost for households, current statistics reveal striking disparities in the use of digital public services in Portugal. As noticed by existing studies, inequalities in access or use of online public services have negative social consequences, namely the exclusion of parts of the population from key opportunities for self- and collective- development. It is therefore important to understand the factors that affect citizen engagement in online exchange of information with public authorities. Existing research suggests that education and age are determinant factors of individual online engagement. However, aggregate scores tells us very little about what can be done to correct imbalances and steer digital inclusion. Thus, our study will examine levels of internet interaction between citizens and public authorities looking at sub-categories in age and education cohorts, in order to establish a set of preliminary hypotheses on the factors that influence disparities in individual engagement in digital public services. The findings will contribute to expand knowledge on how to adequately align policy towards effective interaction between private users and public providers, which will be critical for improving governance and reducing inequalities.
Keywords: e-government, digital divide, digital exclusion, digital literacy, inequalities
1.Introduction
In 2014, the OECD issued a recommendation that aimed at bringing governments closer to citizens and businesses through the implementation of digital government, i.e. "the use of digital technologies, as an integrated part of governments' modernisation strategies, to create public value"(OECD 2014: 6). The recommendation defines "public value" as the "benefits for society that may vary according to the perspective or the actors, including the following : 1) goods or services that satisfy the desires of citizens and clients; 2) production choices that meet citizen expectations of justice, fairness, efficiency and effectiveness; 3) properly ordered and productive public institutions that reflect citizens' desires and preferences; 4) fairness and efficiency of distribution; 5) legitimate use of resource to accomplish public purposes; and 6) innovation and adaptability to...