Abstract

Background

Psychiatry has faced significant criticism for overreliance on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and medications with purported disregard for empathetic, humanistic interventions.

Aims

To develop an empirically based qualitative theory explaining how psychiatrists use empathy in day-to-day practice, to inform practice and teaching approaches.

Method

This study used constructivist grounded theory methodology to ask (a) ‘How do psychiatrists understand and use empathetic engagement in the day-to-day practice of psychiatry?’ and (b) ‘How do psychiatrists learn and teach the skills of empathetic engagement?’ The authors interviewed 17 academic psychiatrists and 4 residents and developed a theory by iterative coding of the collected data.

Results

This constructivist grounded theory of empathetic engagement in psychiatric practice considered three major elements: relational empathy, transactional empathy and instrumental empathy. As one moves from relational empathy through transactional empathy to instrumental empathy, the actions of the psychiatrist become more deliberate and interventional.

Conclusions

Participants were described by empathy-based interventions which are presented in a theory of ‘empathetic engagement’. This is in contrast to a paradigm that sees psychiatry as purely based on neurobiological interventions, with psychotherapy and interpersonal interventions as completely separate activities from day-to-day psychiatric practice.

Details

Title
Use of empathy in psychiatric practice: Constructivist grounded theory study
Author
Ross, James 1 ; Watling, Chris 2 

 Department of Psychiatry, Western University, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada 
 Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Education Research and innovation (CERI), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada 
Pages
26-33
Publication year
2017
Publication date
Jan 2017
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
e-ISSN
20564724
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2216713953
Copyright
© 2017 This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.