Abstract
Fifteen recommendations and a therapeutic algorithm regarding the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at the early phase in adults are proposed. The Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology has been followed. Four recommendations (low tidal volume, plateau pressure limitation, no oscillatory ventilation, and prone position) had a high level of proof (GRADE 1 + or 1 −); four (high positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] in moderate and severe ARDS, muscle relaxants, recruitment maneuvers, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) a low level of proof (GRADE 2 + or 2 −); seven (surveillance, tidal volume for non ARDS mechanically ventilated patients, tidal volume limitation in the presence of low plateau pressure, PEEP > 5 cmH2O, high PEEP in the absence of deleterious effect, pressure mode allowing spontaneous ventilation after the acute phase, and nitric oxide) corresponded to a level of proof that did not allow use of the GRADE classification and were expert opinions. Lastly, for three aspects of ARDS management (driving pressure, early spontaneous ventilation, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), the experts concluded that no sound recommendation was possible given current knowledge. The recommendations and the therapeutic algorithm were approved by the experts with strong agreement.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
2 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest, Brest Cedex, France
3 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
4 Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Centre, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
5 Service de Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié– Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
6 Intensive Care Unit, Louis Mourier Hospital, AP-HP, Colombes, France
7 Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital De La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
8 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (DAR B), Saint Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
9 Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, DHU A-TVB, Créteil, France
10 Medical Intensive Care Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers Cedex, France
11 Emergency Department, General Hospital of Annecy, Annecy, France
12 Hospital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne, France
13 Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Robert Ballanger, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France




