Abstract

Purpose

We assessed the recent trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy thereby evaluating the role of the 70-gene signature (70-GS) testing in decision-making in the systemic treatment of patients with lymph node negative (N0) and lymph node positive (N+) breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with a national guideline directed indication for 70-GS use treated between 2013 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated within guideline- and age-delineated subgroups. The influence of the 70-GS on chemotherapy use was assessed with logistic regression.

Results

During the study period, the overall administration of adjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 49 to 23% and 70-GS use increased from 24 to 51%. The 70-GS was not associated with a decreased likelihood for N0 patients to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.17), as the proportion of N0 patients who received chemotherapy in the absence of 70-GS use decreased during the study period. In patients with N1a disease, 70-GS testing was associated with a decreased likelihood to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.15–0.29). In patients < 50 years and 50–59 years of age, 70-GS use was associated with a consistent lower proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy throughout the study period (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13–0.23 and OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43–0.65, respectively).

Conclusions

In this population-based study, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ breast cancer strongly declined. For node-positive and younger patients, 70-GS use was associated with a decreased probability for patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

Details

Title
The Changing Role of Gene-Expression Profiling in the Era of De-escalating Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Author
J E C van Steenhoven 1 ; Kuijer, A 2 ; Schreuder, K 3 ; Elias, S G 4 ; van Diest, P J 5 ; van der Wall, E 6 ; Siesling, S 7 ; T van Dalen 8 

 Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
 Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands 
 Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
 Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
 Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
 Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
 Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands 
 Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
Pages
3495-3501
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Oct 2019
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
10689265
e-ISSN
15344681
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2241833101
Copyright
Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved., © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.